Kieren MacMillan sympatico.ca> writes:
> I’m just wondering whether it might be easy — and ultimately desireable —
to have a built-in method of
> choosing which grobs get repeated and/or omitted during an unfold \repeat
expression.
> Another oft-encountered use case would be
>
> \repeat u
> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 02:09:27 +
> From: Carl Sorensen
> To: Thomas Morley
> Subject: Re: Typesetting chord symbols
>
> On 12/29/14 12:42 PM, "Thomas Morley" wrote:
> >
> > I'm thinking about a major revision of our chord-naming-procedures for
> > quite a while.
> > Something at the lines
On 6 January 2015 at 02:57, Mogens Lemvig Hansen wrote:
>
> Hi Francois,
>
> I prefer to simply repeat the music:
>http://yen-hansen.ca/hymns/mlh03.pdf
> Improved readability that often doesn't even cost extra paper.
>
> Regards,
> Mogens
>
I agree. I think extra paper is “cheaper” than perfo
Hi Francois,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Alicuota618 wrote:
> Anyway, "2.18.0" didnt like it.
> And adapt this chinese thing (scheme) is still for me not an option.
>
> So I suppose its time to upgrade...
>
>
The change I mentioned above should be sufficient to make this work with
2.18:
"No
Anyway, "2.18.0" didnt like it.
And adapt this chinese thing (scheme) is still for me not an option.
So I suppose its time to upgrade...
Thanks to all,
Francois
2015-01-05 17:19 GMT-05:00, David Nalesnik :
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:08 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I've adapted this
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:19:47 -0500
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Another oft-encountered use case would be
>
> \repeat unfold N { a4\pp a a a }
>
> for which one currently must write
>
> a4\pp a a a \repeat unfold N-1 { a4 a a a }
\repeat unfold N { \atfirstrepeat{a\pp} \atsecondrepeat{a\f
Hello all!
I’m just wondering whether it might be easy — and ultimately desireable — to
have a built-in method of choosing which grobs get repeated and/or omitted
during an unfold \repeat expression.
For example, in a string piece I’m currently writing, I have
\repeat unfold 2 { b8( d') b8
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:08 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> I've adapted this to create the divider.
>
>
A bit cleaner--overrides moved to grob definition.
\version "2.19.15"
\header {
tagline = ##f
}
#(define (add-grob-definition grob-name grob-entry)
(let* ((meta-entry (assoc-get 'meta
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:50 AM, tisimst wrote:
> Francois,
>
>
> Francois Planiol wrote
> > How do you:
> > - set stanza # repeating at each new system?
>
> I'm not aware of any automagic way of doing it (but that doesn't mean it
> can't be done, of course :), so in the mean time, simply ad
Have a look at:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=838
Jim
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 01:39:46PM -0700, Jay Hamilton wrote:
> I'm feeling really stupid because I can't find this information (and I
> know it's there) in the manuals either online or in the pdfs.
> basically just want to hold the ba
I'm feeling really stupid because I can't find this information (and I
know it's there) in the manuals either online or in the pdfs.
basically just want to hold the bars to 6 per line and yes I know I can
do this manually but would like to see the appearance if done
automatically.
Thanks in adv
This may help:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=155
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Alicuota618 wrote:
> Hello and Happy New Year to all,
>
> is there a way to parentesize an accidental-only like in the attachement?
>
> This is \key a-minor (or whatever key that d
Hi Francois,
I prefer to simply repeat the music:
http://yen-hansen.ca/hymns/mlh03.pdf
Improved readability that often doesn't even cost extra paper.
Regards,
Mogens
On 2015-01-05, at 6:03, Alicuota618 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Considering a choir-setting with many stanzas, the text makes this
Hi Stefan,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Stefan Thomas
wrote:
> Dear community,
> I would like to move the ottava-bracket a bit upwards.
> Not at the beginning but at the 2nd bar.
> Is there a way to do this?
> \version "2.18.2"
>
Try \alterBroken:
Music = \relative d''' {
\alterBroken p
Francois,
Francois Planiol wrote
> How do you:
> - set stanza # repeating at each new system?
I'm not aware of any automagic way of doing it (but that doesn't mean it
can't be done, of course :), so in the mean time, simply add the "\set
stanza = #" wherever you want it to appear! It's that easy
Dear community,
I would like to move the ottava-bracket a bit upwards.
Not at the beginning but at the 2nd bar.
Is there a way to do this?
\version "2.18.2"
Music = \relative d''' {
\ottava #1
d8 e f e d4 c \break
d'8( e b' e, d2)
}
\new Staff \Music
On 2015-01-05 16:42, Alicuota618 wrote:
Dear Alexander,
About poem, yes, I agree, but spanish songs translators generally dont
care about original rythm (in other words, they dont do the job right
- but the songs are known this way) and there are songs with different
rythm from stanza to stanza
Dear Alexander,
About poem, yes, I agree, but spanish songs translators generally dont
care about original rythm (in other words, they dont do the job right
- but the songs are known this way) and there are songs with different
rythm from stanza to stanza too. So this is better to have the text
un
On 2015-01-05 15:03, Alicuota618 wrote:
Hello,
Considering a choir-setting with many stanzas, the text makes this is
a little bit ugly to read, specially for amateur-choirs in stressing
situation (concert...).
How does engravers eventually make these lyrics more readable?
I think of four possib
So easy!
Many thanks
F
2015-01-05 8:58 GMT-05:00, Brian Barker :
> At 08:14 05/01/2015 -0500, you wrote:
>>is there a way to parenthesize an accidental-only like in the attachment?
>
> Yes: you just follow the pitch by a question mark: cis? or cs?.
>
> Brian Barker - privately
>
>
_
Hello,
Considering a choir-setting with many stanzas, the text makes this is
a little bit ugly to read, specially for amateur-choirs in stressing
situation (concert...).
How does engravers eventually make these lyrics more readable?
I think of four possibilities:
- repeating the stanza # at each
Hello and Happy New Year to all,
is there a way to parentesize an accidental-only like in the attachement?
This is \key a-minor (or whatever key that doesnt contain a c-sharp)
and should give a notice that the last repeat of refrain CAN be
c-sharp (picard third).
Thanks in advance,
Francois
___
Hi All,
Here's a new snippet posted by a French user :
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=970
who asked for translation help.
So I've made it but engish is not my mother language and I'm no
percussionist; please be so kind to tell if anything's wrong.
I've also tagged it as "docs"
See disuss
23 matches
Mail list logo
