Hi all,
In the snippet included below, I’d like to have the two time signatures
center-aligned, but haven’t found the correct incantation.
(Gould has nothing specific to say about this situation, but her polymetric
time signatures *appear* to be centre-aligned, and not left-aligned like Lily’s
Hi all,
How can I get \repeat percent {} to print a percent sign in ChordNames?
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
Kieren MacMillan, composer
www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info
email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
lilypond-user mailing list
benbigno...@gmx.dehi Kieren,
you could also try:
% ---
\version 2.18.2
\chords {
\repeat percent 4 { a2:m f }
\repeat percent 4 { g1 c }
}
\layout {
\context {
\ChordNames
\consists Percent_repeat_engraver
\consists
Am 11.04.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Gilles:
Hello.
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 11:19:31 -0700 (MST), Paul Morris wrote:
Gilles Sadowski wrote
It works but the sound is still cut after every bar: It looks like no
tie was added to the last note of a bar.
What is the advantage of using \makeOctaves wrt
Hi Klaus,
you could also try
Yes! Perfect.
Embarassed that I didn’t think of it myself.
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
Kieren MacMillan, composer
www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info
email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
lilypond-user
Hi Kieren,
I'm not sure you'll like it since it is no incantation but a workaround.
Though it's well centered, so here it goes:
shortTSmusic = {
\tweak layer #-1
\tweak stencil
#(lambda (grob)
(grob-interpret-markup grob
#{
\markup
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=908
2015-04-11 22:16 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca:
Hi all,
How can I get \repeat percent {} to print a percent sign in ChordNames?
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
Kieren MacMillan, composer
www:
Gilles Sadowski wrote
It works but the sound is still cut after every bar: It looks like no
tie was added to the last note of a bar.
What is the advantage of using \makeOctaves wrt having two
\dronify?
Hi Gilles,
You're welcome. There's no real advantage to using \makeOctaves, just a
Hello.
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 11:19:31 -0700 (MST), Paul Morris wrote:
Gilles Sadowski wrote
It works but the sound is still cut after every bar: It looks like
no
tie was added to the last note of a bar.
What is the advantage of using \makeOctaves wrt having two
\dronify?
Hi Gilles,
You're
Hi Pierre,
I'm not sure you'll like it since it is no incantation but a workaround.
I appreciate the work… but I have multiple instances of this issue, with
different combinations of time signatures, so this isn’t sufficient to save
much manual work.
I’ll just use the \editionEngraver to
Hi Pierre,
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=908
Thanks! That’ll do for now.
Best,
Kieren.
___
Kieren MacMillan, composer
www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info
email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Hi Kieren,
a few weeks ago, I had exactly the same question while fiddling around with
this:
Chord_sheet.ly
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n174400/Chord_sheet.ly
I'm not sure if I was inspired by http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=460 or
if I found the solution somewhere else.
Hi Philippe,
How about:
\version 2.18.2
bassfigures = \figuremode {
%% option 1:
\override BassFigureAlignment.stacking-dir = #1
4 54 3
\revert BassFigureAlignment.stacking-dir
}
\new FiguredBass
%% option 2:
%\with { \override BassFigureAlignment.stacking-dir = #1 }
Hello,
I'm trying to achieve this result:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n174360/figured_543.png
The problem is to have the 3 at the same height of the 4, but blank space
above it.
I tried to include an empty markup above the 3, but it didn't work.
Another idea would be to blank
Hi Richard,
Your option is more elegant than mine!
In short, yours goes:
\version 2.18.2
bassFig = \figuremode {
5 44 3
}
\new Staff
\bassFig
\new Voice \relative c' { f2 }
I'll keep it in mind.
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-04-11 9:40 GMT+02:00 flup2 phili...@philmassart.net:
Thanks for
On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 23:59 -0700, flup2 wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to achieve this result:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n174360/figured_543.png
The problem is to have the 3 at the same height of the 4, but blank space
above it.
Hmm, curiously Denemo gives this as the
Sorry - I attached the wrong file :(
Also, I should mention that LilyPond does not always achieve such nice
alignment with this syntax and the commands to raise and lower
individual figures are sometimes needed anyway.
Richard
On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 08:26 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
On Fri,
Thanks for these informations, I'll look into it this week-end :-)
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Figured-bass-blank-extender-tp174360p174365.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
this is related to my previous thread and particularly to the file
attached to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-04/msg00263.html
If I have a Scheme engraver listening to TextScript-s I can get a list
of entries at the same timestep and then compare them for equality.
Hi all,
From time to time in the score I’m currently engraving, I want to force the
time signature to “reappear” in a particular measure even though the time
signature is not changing at that moment.
I don’t want to add a new \time command in the note code (which, I believe,
might solve the
+1!!
As I had to use this override the other day, I crossed my fingers and hoped
that extra-offset was a supported property and sadly learned that it isn't.
Seems like just the thing to be able to give a system a little nudge in either
direction when you need to. After all, that's what pretty
Hi all,
I sometimes use Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-system-details to
explicitly set the Y-offset of a system.
But Lily does such a good job by default, that I usually need only “nudge” the
system by 1 or 2 staff spaces up or down.
So rather than using trial-and-error to find the
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
It happens when you use bar checks!
This is astounding, since bar checks should have no influence on output
at all. If you can confirm this with a minimal example, it should be
worth a bug report IMO.
Actually, no need for a bug report, as everything here is done in a
Gilles Sadowski wrote
It happens when you use bar checks!
The sound is continuous without them but it would be quite annoying to
encode without their help for spotting mistakes... [I use version
2.18.2.]
In addition, the midi volume and instrument used for the drone must be
different from
Hi Urs,
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Hi,
this is related to my previous thread and particularly to the file
attached to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-04/msg00263.html
If I have a Scheme engraver listening to TextScript-s I
Hi List, Hi Harm,
Harm, do you remember this disussion?
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/How-to-catch-the-current-height-of-a-StaffGroup-td46889.html#a46893
Did you finally find something?
I'd like to use the figure to automate this snippet :
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=991
Cheers,
Hi David,
thanks a lot, looks promising. I'll have a look later when I'm home.
Urs
Am 11. April 2015 16:07:24 MESZ, schrieb David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:01 AM, David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Urs,
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Urs
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:01 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Urs,
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Hi,
this is related to my previous thread and particularly to the file
attached to
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Klaus Blum benbigno...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Eljakim,
all I can offer you is a function to simplify things a little bit.
However, it is necessary to pass two parameters:
- a destination pitch for transposition and key signature
- a markup for use in the title
%
2015-04-10 14:45 GMT+02:00 Eljakim Schrijvers eschrijv...@eljakim.nl:
Hi there,
I have an exercise defined as follows (most of the actual notes taken out).
What I would like to do is transpose that exercise to g, d, a, e, b, fis,
..., f
and have it repeated in each key. I want each
Hi David,
No promises, just something hacked together. This only moves time signatures
belonging to the same paper column as a criteron of vertical relatedness.
Can't say if that's a valid assumption.
Outstanding! Works great on all the examples I can see in this score.
Thanks!
Kieren.
Hi Kieren,
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi Pierre,
I'm not sure you'll like it since it is no incantation but a workaround.
I appreciate the work… but I have multiple instances of this issue, with
different combinations of time
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi David,
No promises, just something hacked together. This only moves time
signatures belonging to the same paper column as a criteron of vertical
relatedness. Can't say if that's a valid assumption.
33 matches
Mail list logo