Of course I shall add include path arguments, and ~ expansion.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
While writing flatten-ly to recursively flatten nested include files, I notice
that lilypond 2.19.25 (at least) does not honour ~ in a path name, and throws a
fatal error.
The NR says you can say:
\include ~/libA/libA.ly”
Am I missing something?
Setting this has no effect (and why should
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:35:35 +1000
Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com wrote:
Although it can be written in Python or any language, I felt Scheme is in
the spirit of lilypond.
Scheme is for LP extenstions. This tool, being a standalone program, can
much better be written in Perl or Python.
Hi Brian,
It can hardly be censoring. :-) Recently I have posted several messages to this
list and they simply do not appear, causing me to think my mailer is defective,
only to eventually turn up days later. There must be an oddity in the mailing
list software. It’s not discriminating
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Owain Sutton ow...@owainsutton.co.uk
wrote:
I want a full quote of the line, including slurs/dynamics/etc. so it's
playable
by a different instrument if the intended one is not present, so I'm not
using
Cue instead. However, I want the quote to be with
Greetings Javier.
Here is a program I wrote for you, flatten-ly to read a lilypond file and
output it recursively flattening all the nested includes. It’s a shell script
invoking guile.
Usage: flatten-ly file
Outputs to standard output.
Unashamedly Linux.
I’ll make it more robust, and add a
It might be helpful to have lilyjazz examples old/new side by side with
explicite evidence to the unbeautiful elements?
I just got the new version happily to work. I cannot make such
examples as I do not have the old/new version working simultaneosly. I
fear my lilypond skills are not
Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes:
On Aug 23, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Peter Selinger selin...@mathstat.dal.ca wrote:
- (ly:grob-set-property! rest 'stencil #f)
+ (ly:grob-set-property! rest 'Y-offset offset)
I wonder if this might work instead:
(ly:grob-set-property! rest
I have a lilypond file which used to parse perfectly well several years ago. I
recently reinstalled lilypond (2.18.2 from debian-stable) and now I receive an
error. I've reduced the file down and determined that setting the stringTunings
is the problem. The file I have has both guitar tab and
Hello Kevin,
welcome back to the Pond :-)
There have been many syntax changes since v2.12, and one of them is the
culprit here, so you’ll want to get a look at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/usage/updating-files-with-convert_002dly.
(In case you’re using Frescobaldi: Tools/Update
Am 24.08.2015 um 17:36 schrieb Kevin Nowaczyk:
I have a lilypond file which used to parse perfectly well several years ago. I
recently reinstalled lilypond (2.18.2 from debian-stable) and now I receive an
error. I've reduced the file down and determined that setting the stringTunings
is the
CAL0tT4vL=4mkthkhmgr-z+oj3jawnr7xvc9ahwhqj-goita...@mail.gmail.com
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Owain Sutton ow...@owainsutton.co.uk
wrote:
I want a full quote of the line, including slurs/dynamics/etc. so it's
playable
by a different instrument if the intended one is not present, so I'm
Kevin Nowaczyk beakerbo...@yahoo.com writes:
I have a lilypond file which used to parse perfectly well several
years ago.
Run convert-ly -ed on the file. At least on your example file, it
upgraded the version successfully. The resulting code is rather ugly
but works. You might want to look
Am 24.08.2015 um 18:59 schrieb owainsut...@gmail.com:
Is there a way to (a) use 'transposedCueDuring' which retains these details
from the original,
Yes, see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/writing-parts#index-quotedCueEventTypes.
Although actually a ‘cue’, as you are
On 24/08/15 19:32, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Am 24.08.2015 um 18:59 schrieb owainsut...@gmail.com:
Is there a way to (a) use 'transposedCueDuring' which retains these
details
from the original,
Yes, see
I have looked though the documentation without finding what I need. The
attached code gives me a triplet whose notes are spaced according to the
words. I would like to equalize the spacing between the notes. Is
there a snippet I have missed, or some technique that will provide this?
Bill
Hi Bill,
‘proportional notation’ is the magic word:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/proportional-notation.
HTH, Simon
Am 24.08.2015 um 20:54 schrieb William Marchant:
I have looked though the documentation without finding what I need.
The attached code gives me a
selin...@mathstat.dal.ca (Peter Selinger) writes:
this is a true newbie question. I am trying to engrave two polyphonic
voices on a single staff. Since the two voices have all their rests in
common, I only want to typeset each rest once, so I use spacer rests
in the second voice. Still the
How about this:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/proportional-notation
- Abraham
On 8/24/2015 12:55 PM, William Marchant [via Lilypond] wrote:
I have looked though the documentation without finding what I need. The
attached code gives me a triplet whose notes are
Hello,
following 19th century practice, I am using StaffGroup for choir scores.
When there are longer syllables at the end of a measure, they avoid to
overlap with the span bar, which costs horizontal space. I’d prefer this
to be turned off, but how? I might conduct a lengthy and imprecise
Hi Andrew,
many thanks for your work.
I just tried the script and can’t avoid getting an error about lacking
rights. My command was:
$flatten-ly 18-der-stuermische-morgen.ly debug.ly
sudo doesn’t help and it’s regardless of whether I place the script in
/usr/bin/ or in ~/.
Can you tell why
Am Montag, den 24. August 2015 um 21:57:37 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Blöchl Bernhard:
The attached file is a binary, not a lilypond file, regardless of the
extension .ly?
No, it is a text file but the mime type of the attachment is specified
as application/octet stream. I changed it to text/plain in
Am 24.08.2015 um 22:12 schrieb Kevin Nowaczyk:
Thanks for the help everyone,
I would up changing the stringTungings line to:
\set Staff.stringTunings = \stringTuning e,, a,, d, g,
And everything works fine. However, I also tried the notaion:
\set Staff.stringTunings = #bass-tuning
but that
In this case..the band is little known and no longer together. I had it hidden
from view for anonymous visitors except open it up for the next couple days for
people here who were interested in checking it out.
I do like the automatic midi feature. It helps identify mistakes pretty easily.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:56 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
selin...@mathstat.dal.ca (Peter Selinger) writes:
this is a true newbie question. I am trying to engrave two polyphonic
voices on a single staff. Since the two voices have all their rests in
common, I only want to
selin...@mathstat.dal.ca (Peter Selinger) writes:
this is a true newbie question. I am trying to engrave two polyphonic
voices on a single staff. Since the two voices have all their rests in
common, I only want to typeset each rest once, so I use spacer rests
in the second voice. Still the
Thanks for the help everyone,
I would up changing the stringTungings line to:
\set Staff.stringTunings = \stringTuning e,, a,, d, g,
And everything works fine. However, I also tried the notaion:
\set Staff.stringTunings = #bass-tuning
but that didn't work. I'll have to figure that out at a later
Am 24.08.2015 um 21:57 schrieb Blöchl Bernhard:
The attached file is a binary, not a lilypond file, regardless of the
extension .ly?
Have another look: it’s not flatten.ly, but flatten-ly – without any
file name extension.
It’s not a binary either, but plain text, and is used as a shell script,
2015-08-24 21:27 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de:
Hello,
following 19th century practice, I am using StaffGroup for choir scores.
When there are longer syllables at the end of a measure, they avoid to
overlap with the span bar, which costs horizontal space. I’d prefer this to
The attached file is a binary, not a lilypond file, regardless of the
extension .ly?
Am 24.08.2015 03:23, schrieb Andrew Bernard:
Greetings Javier.
Here is a program I wrote for you, flatten-ly to read a lilypond file
and output it recursively flattening all the nested includes. It's a
Indeed. I did manage to miss the Score.quotedCueEventTypes part of the docs
before, my error.
I'd prefer not to have to list the events in this way, I just want everything
included, and listing them sets up the potential for error, in omitting some.
As I indicated earlier, I don't know
Hi Johan,
Unless you enjoy writing Scheme as much as I do!
Scheme is perfectly fine for utility programs. It may be less maintainable for
the hoi polloi - but then, the same can be said of llypond! :-)
While guile is aimed at being an extension language, don't forget that Scheme
was taught at
While guile is aimed at being an extension language, don't forget that
Scheme was taught at MIT for many, many years as the finest language to
give students a deep insight into computing and computer science (refer
SICP). [Sadly, they now teach Python instead. Real world practicality
defeated
Greetings All,
The utility to flatten nested includes, vastly improved. The moment I posted
the initial draft I realised people keep includes in directories other than the
current directory. This takes account of that.
Will publish to openlilylib when I make a lilypond wrapper for it similar
If you want to put flatten-ly into your lilypond installation, copy it to the
lilypond installation bin directory, and make a symbolic link to the lilypond
guile wrapper in your bin directory where the other lilypond tools are.
For example:
$ cp flatten-ly ~/lilypond/usr/bin
$ ln -s
Thanks to Simon and Abraham. I found the quoted reference on my own,
but I need something which can be applied to several single bars
throughout the music. It is the lyrics which are distorting just a few
bars. I had hoped there would be a snippet I am unable to find. Is
there one? TIA.
Greetings Michael,
I used to use APL! Truly wonderful.
As to beauty, while subjective, amongst mathematicians at least there is a
shared sense of the beautiful, and not purely personal taste. Scheme has the
elegance mathematicians and computer scientists perceive. Nobody could say
Python is
Michael Gerdau wrote:
Anybody remembering APL ?
APL was my main lang. for decades,
as is now its superset/descendant, J.
I've got weary trying to tell anybody
why. But the curious might take a
peek at
http://www.jsoftware.com/
Pete
___
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:51 PM, William Marchant wmarch...@eastlink.ca
wrote:
Thanks to Simon and Abraham. I found the quoted reference on my own, but
I need something which can be applied to several single bars throughout
the music. It is the lyrics which are distorting just a few bars.
PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
Michael Gerdau wrote:
Anybody remembering APL ?
APL was my main lang. for decades,
as is now its superset/descendant, J.
It is fitting that the language name is now a single character. I am
just surprised that it is one in the ASCII character set.
Before we all get booted off for being OT, here’s quicksort in J, using a
concept called tacit programming:
quicksort=: (($:@(#[), (=#[), $:@(#[)) ({~ ?@#)) ^: (1#)
Truly beautiful, in all seriousness. This is not a joke! :-)
Andrew
___
Very amusing!
But what about B, C, D, E, F, G, K (an APL derivative), L (several), R, S, T (a
Scheme dialect) to name a few?
Seriously now, APL had special keyboards with the symbols which were wondrous
to behold. And indeed, J was constructed in recognition of the divine
impracticality of
42 matches
Mail list logo
