Re: Emacs lilypond-mode

Andrew Bernard writes: > Hi David, > > Works very nicely. A sincere thank you for your work. > > Now I can have a .dir-locals.el as follows: > > ;;; Directory Local Variables > ;;; For more information see (info "(emacs) Directory Variables") > > ((LilyPond-mode > (LilyPond-lilypond-command . "

A/B part

Irish fiddle tunes and derivated country tunes or square dances usually are organised in two parts with 8 bars/measures each with repeat. Commonly the parts are marked with A and B in a square above the note lines. (If needed I can search for a link with an example to post it.) How can I produ

Re: A/B part

Hi, May be this is what you are searching for: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/bars#index-reh earsal-marks Regards, Jean Le mercredi 14 octobre 2015 à 12:00 +0200, BB a écrit : > Irish fiddle tunes and derivated country tunes or square dances > usually > are organised i

Re: A/B part

BB writes: > Irish fiddle tunes and derivated country tunes or square dances > usually are organised in two parts with 8 bars/measures each with > repeat. Commonly the parts are marked with A and B in a square above > the note lines. (If needed I can search for a link with an example to > post it

Re: Emacs lilypond-mode

On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:54:49 +1100 Andrew Bernard wrote: > [...] I now have a > dream lilypond coding environment on Ubuntu. Alternatively, you could try http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/LPminiIDE.zip . -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond

Re: A/B part

That A/B marks in squares are not related to any bar numbers. It is usually done in the noatation of Traditionals. I think it is good to give the sheet a clear structure. As it usually is done in sheet music one might see on http://www.onlinesheetmusic.com/blackberry-blossom-p207069.aspx I wil

RE: Notes are doubled on forced beaming

Thank you Now it's all clear! Best, Michał -Original Message- From: lilypond-user-bounces+konopacki.m=gmail@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+konopacki.m=gmail@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Noeck Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 12:40 AM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Notes

partcombine and multi-measure rests

Hello LilyPonders, When changing the type of \partcombine (for instance, using \partcombineApart in the middle of the score) when one of the parts has multi-measure rests I get some strange results: code: partbug.ly

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Quoting Gilberto Agostinho (gilbertohasn...@gmail.com): > When changing the type of \partcombine (for instance, using > \partcombineApart in the middle of the score) when one of the parts has > multi-measure rests I get some strange results: > >

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

David Wright wrote > I think you're making the assumption that R1*4 is just a textual > shorthand for R1 R1 R1 R1 but it isn't. R1*4 is a single "chunk". Oh, I see. So the chunk already happened before the different \partcombine option is selected. Well, this makes combining parts slightly more an

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Something just crossed my mind and this works out well: by using \repeat unfold N R1 we can solve this problem, as it creates N individual R1's instead of enlarging a single one. For the lazy ones (like me), defining a function \RN makes life even easier: \version "2.17.95" RN = #(define-music-f

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

On 14.10.2015 20:41, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: Something just crossed my mind and this works out well: by using \repeat unfold N R1 we can solve this problem, This is not a full solution: if you try \compressFullBarRests, you’ll notice different behaviour (some wrote a music function to deal w

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

On 14.10.2015 20:41, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: \version "2.17.95" Just out of interest: what makes you still use that particular version? Regards, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lily

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Hi Simon, Simon Albrecht-2 wrote > This is not a full solution: if you try \compressFullBarRests, you’ll > notice different behaviour (some wrote a music function to deal with > this though). You are right, I haven't spotted this shortcoming. Simon Albrecht-2 wrote > I’d say that the partcom

Re: alternate endings without repeats

Thank you all! Juro ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Emacs lilypond-mode comment indenting

Would there be any simple way to make the emacs lilypond mode indent % comments to the same level as the code, and not over to the right as it currently does? I am afraid I am not an elisp hacker. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@

Re: Emacs lilypond-mode comment indenting

Quoting Andrew Bernard (andrew.bern...@gmail.com): > Would there be any simple way to make the emacs lilypond mode indent % > comments to the same level as the code, and not over to the right as it > currently does? I am afraid I am not an elisp hacker. I use % for trailing comments and %% for o

Re: Emacs lilypond-mode comment indenting

Problem solved. I think this mode comes from AUCTeX mode, so that usage probably arises there. Andrew > On 15 Oct 2015, at 11:59, David Wright wrote: > > I use % for trailing comments and %% for others. The latter ones > indent to the same level as the line they follow. _

Re: Emacs lilypond-mode comment indenting

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 07:59:00PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > Quoting Andrew Bernard (andrew.bern...@gmail.com): > > Would there be any simple way to make the emacs lilypond mode indent % > > comments to the same level as the code, and not over to the right as it > > currently does? I am afraid