Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On Sun 24 Apr 2016 at 19:18:01 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote: > On 24/04/2016 03:13, David Wright wrote: > >On Sat 23 Apr 2016 at 11:25:05 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote: > >>On 22/04/16 19:36, David Wright wrote: > >>>On Fri 22 Apr 2016 at 15:47:59 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote: > On 22/04/2016

Re: Guitar bend error

Thanks to everyone who responded! I appreciate it. I think I might have some followup questions - like, how come the graceBend slurs are always facing down in the output when it says “up” in the definitions file? - but I’ll see if I can get the openlilylib files to work first. Although I want

Files to include on a flash drive

Greetings - My wife and I traveled to Cuba for 2 weeks recently. On our trip, we met a number of Cuban musicians. I described, through an interpreter (my Spanish is not very good yet), LilyPond and what it can do. Some of the musicians expressed an interest in LilyPond. I'm pretty sure I can get

Re: Weird key sig accumulation

2016-04-25 0:48 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Simon Albrecht writes: > >> Hello everybody, >> >> I’ve built some music functions to handle a large, multi-section >> piece, and ran into a strange problem, which I could boil down to the >> attached example. >> If

Re: Weird key sig accumulation

Simon Albrecht writes: > Hello everybody, > > I’ve built some music functions to handle a large, multi-section > piece, and ran into a strange problem, which I could boil down to the > attached example. > If the concat-part function is called on the \key expression

Weird key sig accumulation

Hello everybody, I’ve built some music functions to handle a large, multi-section piece, and ran into a strange problem, which I could boil down to the attached example. If the concat-part function is called on the \key expression multiple times in parallel, the \key expressions are

Re: Guitar bend error

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:38:31PM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2016-04-24 17:13 GMT+02:00 Stephen MacNeil : > > > > It was written by Marc Hohl I just adapted it to have no tab since I don't > > use tab > > > > > > see > > > >

Re: Absfontsize wrong font size in final PDF

Thanks for your responses. The mysterious different point sizes solved my issue. Thanks once more. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Absfontsize-wrong-font-size-in-final-PDF-tp189745p189984.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Guitar bend error

2016-04-24 17:13 GMT+02:00 Stephen MacNeil : > Add a line break before bar 25 > > r4 r8 e' g2 | \break % gradual bend on g2 towards a | > > % BAR 25 > > \bendGrace g8( a2) g2( | % gradual bend on g2 towards a | > > \bendGrace g8 a4 g8) e g2( | % gradual bend on g2

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

On Sun 24 Apr 2016 at 10:55:39 (+0200), m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote: [-- Attachment #1 --] [-- Type: text/html, Encoding: base64, Size: 4.7K --] [-- text/html is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] Please configure your client to post a text equivalent of your HTML code. Cheers,

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

On Sun 24 Apr 2016 at 10:00:38 (+0200), Urs Liska wrote: > Am 24.04.2016 um 09:56 schrieb David Kastrup: > > Noeck writes: > >>> So how do you define "the default" > >> As written before: What ships with the default installation. > > > > So python3 needs to be invoked using

make many icons

I want to create about a hundred icons that contain short (2- 5-note) rhythms or melodic shapes, without staff lines. They will have no staff (which I see how to do). Ideally I could write them all in one file and invoke lilypond to create the hundred or so svg files. (My current solution is

Re: Guitar bend error

On 24/04/2016 16:13, Stephen MacNeil wrote: Add a line break before bar 25 r4 r8 e' g2 | \break % gradual bend on g2 towards a | % BAR 25 \bendGrace g8( a2) g2( | % gradual bend on g2 towards a | \bendGrace g8 a4 g8) e g2( | % gradual bend on g2 towards a | Or, if it's a longer piece and

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On 24/04/2016 03:13, David Wright wrote: On Sat 23 Apr 2016 at 11:25:05 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote: On 22/04/16 19:36, David Wright wrote: On Fri 22 Apr 2016 at 15:47:59 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote: On 22/04/2016 14:31, Kieren MacMillan wrote: David K wrote: Hm? How could you even have a

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" No disagreement here. At the very least it would be verification that the ones responsible for doing the GUB part of the transition are comfortable with the basic necessities. I think the only person likely to be able to

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Paul Morris writes: >> On Apr 24, 2016, at 11:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Paul Morris writes: >> >>> IIUC, wouldn’t the first step be, in any case, to get LilyPond’s >>> python scripts working on python 2.7? >> >> Which ones

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

> On Apr 24, 2016, at 11:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > > Paul Morris writes: > >> IIUC, wouldn’t the first step be, in any case, to get LilyPond’s >> python scripts working on python 2.7? > > Which ones _aren't_ working with Python 2.7? I run a number of

Re: Guitar bend error

>The code Stephan hosts is a nightmare, because all indentation has >gone. This is true :) but I actually read it better... not sure why. and not being able to type fast it just works for me cheers Stephen ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Paul Morris writes: > IIUC, wouldn’t the first step be, in any case, to get LilyPond’s > python scripts working on python 2.7? Which ones _aren't_ working with Python 2.7? I run a number of them routinely, and I just converted some file with midi2ly as well. -- David

Guitar bend error

Add a line break before bar 25 r4 r8 e' g2 | \break % gradual bend on g2 towards a | % BAR 25 \bendGrace g8( a2) g2( | % gradual bend on g2 towards a | \bendGrace g8 a4 g8) e g2( | % gradual bend on g2 towards a | HTH Stephen It was written by Marc Hohl I just adapted it to have no tab

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

IIUC, wouldn’t the first step be, in any case, to get LilyPond’s python scripts working on python 2.7? Then at that point we could discuss and decide about whether it’s better to switch to python 3 or to support both 2.7 and 3. Searching the LilyPond source code for files with extension “.py”

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 13:46 GMT+02:00 m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl : > [...] Many python > syntax can be compatible with both Python2 and Python3 without much effort. > There are in practice only a few things that are a bit harder. For example > strings/unicode/binary datatypes. If it's

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-23 13:59 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard : > But lilypond ships its own internal version of python in …lilypond/usr/bin. > Is this not to shield lilypond from system versions? In my experience, the Python interpreter bundled with LilyPond on Mac is pretty unusable,

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 02:02:19PM +0200, Noeck wrote: > > I will add a comment to the first of these two issues (and mark the second > > as duplicate): > > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1895/ > > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1895/ > > Which two? They are the

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

> I will add a comment to the first of these two issues (and mark the second as > duplicate): > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1895/ > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1895/ Which two? They are the same. Probably just a copy-and-paste mistake. For completeness, it

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

How much python code are we talking about within the complete LilyPond project? The discussion until now seems to be a discussion about Python2/3 transitions in general. But maybe the situation isn't that bad. Many python syntax can be compatible with both Python2 and Python3 without much effort.

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Werner LEMBERG writes: >> So far we only have an offer for a hard and incompatible transition >> to Python3-only > > Actually, I dislike this. Similar to you, I don't see a convincing > reason to not write python code that is compatible with both version 2 > and version 3. Well,

Re: error: can't allocate region - layout block?

2016-04-22 17:20 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen : > On 4/22/16 7:11 AM, "matpen3@gmail" wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>I¹m again plagued by a memory error: >> >>lilypond(27883,0xa2db5000) malloc: *** mach_vm_map(size=106917888) failed >>(error code=3) >>*** error: can't

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

> So far we only have an offer for a hard and incompatible transition > to Python3-only Actually, I dislike this. Similar to you, I don't see a convincing reason to not write python code that is compatible with both version 2 and version 3. Werner

Re: Guitar bend error

2016-04-24 7:50 GMT+02:00 Devon LePage : > I’m transcribing a rock guitar solo, and to engrave the many string bends > I’m using Stephen MacNeil’s LilyPond code library, available here: > > http://mglessons.com/lilypond/ The code Stephan hosts is a nightmare, because all

Re: Key list in lyricmode

On 24.04.2016 07:53, David Kastrup wrote: Simon Albrecht writes: Hello everybody, (well, to be honest, hello David :-) ) I’m sorry, but I still need some enlightenment on the new alist variable feature. What’s the problem with the following snippet? %%%

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

If anybody likes to check the difference between 2-3 here are just two links https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.0.html http://www.cs.carleton.edu/faculty/jgoldfea/cs201/spring11/Python2vs3.pdf There are many more docs on internet dealing with the version differences ...

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

"m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl" writes: > Has anyone considered using the six library? Six has helped me a lot > in my own Python projects to write code that is compatible with both > python2 and python3. Well, as long as we have no one considering doing a gradual

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Has anyone considered using the six library? Six has helped me a lot in my own Python projects to write code that is compatible with both python2 and python3. MT Oorspronkelijk bericht Onderwerp: Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0Van: David Kastrup Aan: Urs

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Urs Liska writes: > Am 24.04.2016 um 09:56 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Noeck writes: >> So how do you define "the default" >>> >>> As written before: What ships with the default installation. >> >> So python3 needs to be invoked using

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:44:33AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > > As a side-note, midi2ly needs our shipped python-version. It stopps > working even with my system-python, i.e. 2.7.9. > Not sure, whether this requires a bugreport, because there is no bug > with lily's python... > I will add a

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

On Sun, 24 Apr 2016 09:54:05 +0200 Urs Liska wrote: > If you install LilyPond through your (Linux) OS's package manager this > will detect any updates to the OS's packages (of course) and will > therefore update automatically whenever you run your package manager's > update

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Thomas Morley writes: > 2016-04-23 11:35 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard : >> Pardon my ignorance but why do you want to support a common subset? >> For what purpose? The whole point of Python 3 is that it breaks 2 in >> order to become a superior and

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Am 24.04.2016 um 09:56 schrieb David Kastrup: > Noeck writes: > >>> So how do you define "the default" >> >> As written before: What ships with the default installation. > > So python3 needs to be invoked using #!/usr/bin/python3 in the scripts > (what happens when Python

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Noeck writes: >> So how do you define "the default" > > As written before: What ships with the default installation. So python3 needs to be invoked using #!/usr/bin/python3 in the scripts (what happens when Python 4 gets created), and we need to either support Python2 and

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Am 24.04.2016 um 09:39 schrieb Villum Sejersen: >> On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:22:23 +0200 >> Urs Liska wrote: > >> >/Am 22.04.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Johan Vromans:/ >> >/>> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild. / >> >/> Good job! Thanks!/ >> >/> / >> >/>> - The new

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-23 11:35 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard : > Pardon my ignorance but why do you want to support a common subset? For what > purpose? The whole point of Python 3 is that it breaks 2 in order to become a > superior and more consistent langauge. It’s been out since 2008,

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

> So how do you define "the default" As written before: What ships with the default installation. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:22:23 +0200 Urs Liska wrote: >/Am 22.04.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Johan Vromans:/ >/ >> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild. / >/ > Good job! Thanks!/ >/ > / >/ >> - The new LilyPond feature to embed source code files in the PDF/ >/ >>

Re: What is the proper way of programmatically generating markup?

> On 24 Apr 2016, at 5:28 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > > 2016-04-24 5:00 GMT+02:00 Matt Hood : >> Hi everyone, >> >> So I’m writing a function that reimplements the ‘\compoundMeter’ command >> with an Orff-style time signature, whereby the

Re: What is the proper way of programmatically generating markup?

2016-04-24 5:00 GMT+02:00 Matt Hood : > Hi everyone, > > So I’m writing a function that reimplements the ‘\compoundMeter’ command > with an Orff-style time signature, whereby the denominator of the signature > is a note head (as opposed to a number), I've done this some month

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Noeck writes: >>> Python 3 is already the default in the latest Ubuntu release. >> >> How do you figure that? I have an up-to-date Ubuntu and calling "python >> --version" gives 2.7.11+. > > By default, I mean what is installed by default/ships with the default >

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

>> Python 3 is already the default in the latest Ubuntu release. > > How do you figure that? I have an up-to-date Ubuntu and calling "python > --version" gives 2.7.11+. By default, I mean what is installed by default/ships with the default installation [1]. /usr/bin/python will point to