Re: Understanding the eps bounding box (rounding)

Hello Karl, Am 02.03.2018 um 01:25 schrieb k...@aspodata.se: In my PostScript Language Document Structuring Conventions Specification Adobe Developer Support Version 3.0 25 September 1992 possible downloadable from https://archive.org/details/ps-doc-struc-conv-3 it says: %%Bou

A lovely segno sign

In the first edition of the Chopin Mazurkas Op. 7, there is a lovely segno symbol used. Has anybody made anything like this? The text font in this edition is also lovely - I wonder if they were letter punch forms? See attached image. The scan is from IMSLP. I'm not trying to recreate this editio

Re: Understanding the eps bounding box (rounding)

In my PostScript Language Document Structuring Conventions Specification Adobe Developer Support Version 3.0 25 September 1992 possible downloadable from https://archive.org/details/ps-doc-struc-conv-3 it says: %%BoundingBox: { } | (atend) ::=(

Re: Put the rests in cross-staff between staves

Or indeed a dedicated stave for the rest if this is going to occur often. \score {   <<     \new Staff = "up" { c''4 \change Staff = "rest" r \change Staff = "up" c'' }     \new Staff = "rest" \with { \omit Staff.StaffSymbol \omit Clef \omit TimeSignature \omit KeySignature 

RE: Put the rests in cross-staff between staves

Paolo, Does the attached accomplish what you want? Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Paolo Prete Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2018 7:01 AM To: Lilypond-User Mailing List Subject: Put the rests in cross-staff between staves

Re: Including tweaks in a variable

On 01.03.2018 17:51, Michael Stickles wrote: It was driving me crazy at first because it still wouldn't work, until I dug through the documentation a bit more and found that 2.18 and 2.19 have a slightly different syntax for the function arguments: Truly the fact that it’s difficult for power

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

Am 01.03.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Stefano Troncaro: ... @Urs, I not familiar with \with blocks, I'll take a look at the oll-core code and experiment a bit with it. Maybe I'll be able to help. Look at https://github.com/openlilylib/scholarly/blob/master/usage-examples/annotate.ly to see an e

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

Am 01.03.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Stefano Troncaro: ... @Urs, I not familiar with \with blocks, I'll take a look at the oll-core code and experiment a bit with it. Maybe I'll be able to help. Look at https://github.com/openlilylib/scholarly/blob/master/usage-examples/annotate.ly to see an e

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

I didn't know about \default or the dot/comma separated number/symbol lists! I can see those being useful in some circumstances. I was thinking about cases where an undefined amount of things different than symbols or numbers are required, and the closest I can imagine is chaining functions to crea

Re: Including tweaks in a variable

Jan-Peter, Thanks. That was the correct idea. It was driving me crazy at first because it still wouldn't work, until I dug through the documentation a bit more and found that 2.18 and 2.19 have a slightly different syntax for the function arguments: 2.19 === smNote = #(define-music-functio

Re: Including tweaks in a variable

Hello Michael, it works if you add \etc to the variable (in lily-dev 2.19.x IIRC): smNote = \tweak font-size #-2 \etc That way smNote becomes a music-function that takes the note as argument and the tweak is applied. If you are using 2.18 you have to create the function like this: smNote = #(de

Including tweaks in a variable

This should be simple, but I just can't seem to get it to work. I'm working on re-doing a lot of our church music, and use variables extensively to help make the .ly files more readable. There are a lot of places where one vocal part splits and we want the "secondary" notes to be smaller, resu

Put the rests in cross-staff between staves

Hello, in a cross-staff bar, is there a simple way to put the rests in the middle between the two staves? Currently, I use that: \override Rest #'staff-position = #-12 ...but I wonder if is there a better way to obtain the same result Thanks___ lilypond

Re: Cross-staff question

Am 01.03.2018 um 11:36 schrieb Paolo Prete: Hello, is there another (easy) way to obtain the same result of this snippet: LilyPond Score LilyPond Score LilyPond Score made using LilyBin. without overridi

Cross-staff question

Hello, is there another (easy) way to obtain the same result of this snippet: LilyPond Score | | | LilyPond Score LilyPond Score made using LilyBin. | | | without overriding the stem's length (\override Stem #'length = #30)  ? Thanks, Paolo

Re: Edition Engraver -- multiple editions

Jan-Peter, Thank you so much. Now I get it! I'm working on critical editions of band music from the French Revolution -- at the moment an Ouverture by Charles-Simon Catel. The edition engraver has just become invaluable to me. All the best, Craig On 1 March 2018 at 18:14, Jan-Peter Voigt wro

Re: ScholarLy and Latex

Hi Craig, Am 23.02.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Hi Lilyponders, I'm having a minor problem with getting my ScholarLy inp file to work with Latex. The Latex output for each annotation looks like this: \criticalRemark    [grob={DynamicText},     grob-location={Can't display grob lo

Re: Edition Engraver -- multiple editions

Hi Craig, you remind me to rethink wording/naming of the different identifiers! In your example you point on two different ID-types. With \addEdition you add one target-ID to the current compilation. You can add multiple targets like fullscore, global-mods, original-page-breaks at once. With