On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:07 AM Michael Taylor
wrote:
> Would it be possible in a future version to have the option of placing text
> within analysis brackets as well as the default above? MT
HorizontalBracketText.direction with a little more tweaking than
should be necessary.
\layout {
\cont
Here's something I cooked up that works for me, though I'm not an avid user:
* vis text editor
* abduco + dvtm for arranging terminal windows and attach/detach
* entr for watching files [2]
* redo for building PDFs [1]
* mupdf
* —and dwm on Arch Linux for tiling all my windows
Probably not the mo
Well mostly I was attracted to Lilypond because it supports generation of MIDI files from
text input, unlike most other programs which are GUI based. For my purposes it's perfect.
From within my Python program I execute Lilypond to "compile" the source into
MIDI and engraving, then I fetch the
Hi Kieren,
> I was simply using your code, and eliminating the spaces to make my point.
if you eliminate the spaces, then the example becomes the opposite of what
it demonstrates. In order to align pedals, you don't have to look at that
example, but you have to check the last one, which shows of
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:07 AM Mark Stephen Mrotek
wrote:
> Paolo,
>
>
>
> “I suspect it has been made, in the past, for an old fashioned style (not
> used in professional engraving, though).”
>
> Looking though my Paderewski Edition of Chopin’s Piano works I find all
> the pedaling indications h
Hi Paolo,
> your version does *not* correspond to my above example.
I was simply using your code, and eliminating the spaces to make my point.
> In order to align pedals at right and left, you could use a combination of
> after and before-linebreaking.
That is a lot of extra manual work to my
Paolo,
“I suspect it has been made, in the past, for an old fashioned style (not used
in professional engraving, though).”
Looking though my Paderewski Edition of Chopin’s Piano works I find all the
pedaling indications horizontally aligned. See an excerpt from Nocturne #12.
This is certain
On 4/7/2020 5:28 PM, cgilmore wrote:
Yes, Karlin High is correct. DX = Developer eXperience
Sorry for the poor communication on my part.
Yay! Do I get a prize? (joking.)
Nothing wrong with a good acronym. DDR-SDRAM sure beats having to say
"double data rate synchronous dynamic random access
Yes, Karlin High is correct. DX = Developer eXperience
Sorry for the poor communication on my part.
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
That "Automatic Preview Update" I'm seeing in pictures of the Preferences
window looks enticing. Are there other features of TeXShop that turned you
on to it?
Yes, I'd definitely be into checking out how you're using it in a _ly.tex
file. Thank you!
And so sorry for the lame acronym usage. Not en
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:31 PM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2020-04-07 1:55 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > Look at this example (again: messy code that could be improved, and I
> > gently ask Harm and/or Aaron to have a check if they can):
>
> For starters, I would seek to eliminate the global variable, i
That's so interesting. Is there something about the functionality of how
Lilypond creates MIDI that makes it ideal for this situation?
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
Yes, I'm so sorry. I don't know why I put that. I despise acronyms usually.
DX = Developer eXperience
I guess it's taken from the idea of UX, User eXperience.
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
On 2020-04-07 1:55 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
Look at this example (again: messy code that could be improved, and I
gently ask Harm and/or Aaron to have a check if they can):
For starters, I would seek to eliminate the global variable, instead
preferring state to be tied to the context in some way
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:41 PM Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > I don't think so. Please have a look at this http://lilybin.com/8ufzza/1
> :
>
> Here’s an edited version, using your method:
>
>
> \version "2.19.83"
>
> notesA = { c''4 4 4 4 }
> notesB = { a4 4 4 4 }
> dynsAndPedPatt
Hi Werner (et al.),
> I think this dispute deserves an issue in our tracker.
Agreed!
> Obviously, there are two engraving schools
I’m not sure whether it’s really two different *schools*… I think it’s a matter
of the tolerances allowed [by a given engraver] in the vertical alignment of
pedal
cgilmore wrote
> What's your DX?
My DX is a 1985 Yamaha DX7, but I hardly use it anymore.
As far as LilyPond is concerned, I'm mostly using Frescobaldi as a DX
(Direct Exchange, i.e. replacement?) for jEdit and emacs.
I'm not a military guy at all (neither physically nor mentally), but I spent
mo
Hi Paolo,
> I don't think so. Please have a look at this http://lilybin.com/8ufzza/1 :
Here’s an edited version, using your method:
\version "2.19.83"
notesA = { c''4 4 4 4 }
notesB = { a4 4 4 4 }
dynsAndPedPattern = { s4\sustainOn s s s\sustainOff }
% GOOD
{
\partcombine
{ \notesA } { \
Well, since you ask: I use Lilypond for generating MIDI backing tracks for use by a
blues/rockabilly band. The plot is to use Lilypond, which I call from inside an
application written in Python, to create little snippets of MIDI - typically one or two
bars but occasionally as many as eight - wh
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:36 PM Noeck wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> well there are pros and cons both ways.
>
> Am 07.04.20 um 18:51 schrieb Paolo Prete:
> > as said to Kieren, this is not a good rule.
>
> I know that you said it already but I disagree. I find it easier to read.
>
> > I never saw any mus
>> I never saw any music engraver who uses it.
>
> and most of my piano scores of publishing houses do it like this. I
> have examples here by Schott and Henle.
I think this dispute deserves an issue in our tracker. Obviously,
there are two engraving schools, an older one to which Paolo refer
On 4/7/20, 10:49 AM, "cgilmore" wrote:
Greetings, all!
I was curious what everyone's setup is like for writing Lilypond,
specifically, for any non-Frescobaldi users. We all know Frescobaldi is
great and probably the most ideal environment for Lilypond, but I'm
personal
On 2020-04-07 9:49 am, cgilmore wrote:
I was curious what everyone's setup is like for writing Lilypond,
specifically, for any non-Frescobaldi users. We all know Frescobaldi is
great and probably the most ideal environment for Lilypond, but I'm
personally curious what other people are using and h
On 2020-04-07 10:49 am, Karlin High wrote:
On 4/7/2020 12:47 PM, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2020-04-07 10:42 am, Robert Blackstone wrote:
PS.I don’t understand your question: "What's your DX?” I have no idea
what a DX is?
Probably "diagnosis" [1].
[1]: https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.
On 4/7/2020 12:47 PM, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2020-04-07 10:42 am, Robert Blackstone wrote:
PS.I don’t understand your question: "What's your DX?” I have no idea
what a DX is?
Probably "diagnosis" [1].
[1]: https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Dx
-- Aaron Hill
Or, if "UX" is "us
On 2020-04-07 10:42 am, Robert Blackstone wrote:
PS.I don’t understand your question: "What's your DX?” I have no idea
what a DX is?
Probably "diagnosis" [1].
[1]: https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Dx
-- Aaron Hill
Hi,
I’m also a Mac User and for LilyPond I use TeXShop with LilyPond engines. For
me it works perfectly.
Up till now I’ve only used Frescobaldi as a means to “LilyPondize” my old
Finale scores by exporting them as .xml and importing these in
Frescobaldi, process them, copy the resulting score a
Hi Paolo,
well there are pros and cons both ways.
Am 07.04.20 um 18:51 schrieb Paolo Prete:
> as said to Kieren, this is not a good rule.
I know that you said it already but I disagree. I find it easier to read.
> I never saw any music engraver who uses it.
and most of my piano scores of publi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 4:13 PM Noeck wrote:
> Hi Paolo and Kieren,
>
> I am currently running into the same issues. I also find jumping pedal
> marks irritating, even the Ped * variant. My preferred algorithm for
> pedal spacing and alignment (not backed up by any notation standard)
> would be th
Greetings, all!
I was curious what everyone's setup is like for writing Lilypond,
specifically, for any non-Frescobaldi users. We all know Frescobaldi is
great and probably the most ideal environment for Lilypond, but I'm
personally curious what other people are using and how they're using
it—most
Dear collective wisdom, in transcribing analytical markings I encountered a
curly horizontal bracket over a number of pitches. Is it possible to format
the existing analysis bracket to reproduce this, or are there other
solutions? Would it be possible in a future version to have the option of
placi
Hi Paolo and Kieren,
I am currently running into the same issues. I also find jumping pedal
marks irritating, even the Ped * variant. My preferred algorithm for
pedal spacing and alignment (not backed up by any notation standard)
would be this:
1. Pedal marks are vertically aligned per system
2.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:41 PM Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > As a general engraving rule/practice, pedals should be aligned only if
> consecutive ones are enough close.
>
> Exactly. That’s what I’m doing — or, more accurately, letting the separate
> context do automatically.
>
>
Hi Ki
Hi Paolo,
> As a general engraving rule/practice, pedals should be aligned only if
> consecutive ones are enough close.
Exactly. That’s what I’m doing — or, more accurately, letting the separate
context do automatically.
> And this would be even worse if you have another simultaneous pedal (i.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:56 AM Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > Why do you say they are visually distracting?
>
> Because as a pianist, it’s easier for me to read
>
> _/\ _/\ _/\
>
> than
>
>_/\
> _/\
Thank you both. Silly me, didn't read the fine print.
Sorry to bother you!
Brent.
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020, 8:20 pm Noeck, wrote:
> This is a longstanding issue. You need to add invisible grace notes in
> the other staves:
>
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-c
This is a longstanding issue. You need to add invisible grace notes in
the other staves:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns.html#Known-issues-and-warnings-58
Joram
This is the issue described in the end of the grace note section here
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns#grace-notes
.
If you insert a spacer of the same length ( \grace s16 ) in all other staves at
the same time (after "\repeat \volta 2 {" ) the doub
Hi all,
I'm typesetting a multi-staff score, and whenever one part begins with
grace notes immediately following a repeat barline, an extra barline is
placed after the grace notes, between them and the note to which they are
attached. It doesn't matter whether I use volta repeats or just insert
re
Hello Pierre,
Yes :
> \override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = 0
solves my issue, thanks!
JM
> Le 7 avr. 2020 à 09:05, Pierre Perol-Schneider
> a écrit :
>
> Hi Jacques,
> Maybe: \override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = 0 % <= or ?
> would do the trick.
> HTH,
Hi Jacques,
Maybe: \override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = 0 % <= or ?
would do the trick.
HTH, cheers,
Pierre
Le lun. 6 avr. 2020 à 19:42, Jacques Menu a écrit :
>
>
> Le 6 avr. 2020 à 19:37, Thomas Morley a écrit :
>
>
>
> Am Mo., 6. Apr. 2020 um 18:33 Uhr schrieb Jacques Menu
41 matches
Mail list logo
