Dear Karsten and list,
On 22.09.20 22:40, Karsten Reincke wrote:
5) I've learned, that all(?) of you consider this an untenable if not
silly position and that the PDFs and midi-files compiled by Lilypond
are never affected by the strong copyleft effect of the GPL. That's
good to hear. But I do
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Dear Karsten and list,
>
> On 22.09.20 22:40, Karsten Reincke wrote:
>> 5) I've learned, that all(?) of you consider this an untenable if
>> not silly position and that the PDFs and midi-files compiled by
>> Lilypond are never affected by the strong copyleft effect of the
On 2020-10-09 18:00, Matthew Moisen wrote:
Hello,
The normal way to run Lilypond is to create a text file and then
call the lilypond executable to convert it into a PDF. Is it
possible to instead from python programmatically call Lilypond
APIs to generate PDFs? I know that I
There’s no such thing as retracting an e-mail, but I would like to do it.
Sorry for failing to realise how old the thread was before replying.
Best, Simon
On 10.10.20 14:11, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Dear Karsten and list,
On 22.09.20 22:40, Karsten Reincke wrote:
5) I've learned, that all(?) of
Hello All,
Since Urs has stepped down from OLL work for personal reasons, as
somebody who has written code for OLL, and contributed some snippets
of some utility, I have been considering taking it all over. I have
proposed to make a new domain openlilylib.space, move to Gitlab.
establish a website
OLL is something that I have occasionally looked into, and something that I am
reassured to know is there: it is something that I hoped to use more in the
future. I do use notation-fonts. I have not used ScholarLy, Edition-engraver
and Analysis so far on occasions when, in hindsight, it would ha
Hi Andrew,
> Like Urs, I get the impression that the effort on OLL is not worth the
> return, as hardly anybody seems to use it and there appears to be
> little interest. This is very disappointing. So, may I ask - it is
> worth me continuing the development and maintenance of OLL?
1. As someone
Am Sa., 10. Okt. 2020 um 15:40 Uhr schrieb Andrew Bernard
:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Since Urs has stepped down from OLL work for personal reasons, as
> somebody who has written code for OLL, and contributed some snippets
> of some utility, I have been considering taking it all over. I have
> proposed to
Hi again,
Of the many exciting developments discussed in Salzburg, one of the most
intriguing [to me] was the idea that OLL might be made into a “full-class
citizen of the ’Pond”.
Evidently, part of the problem of increasing uptake is the “difficulty” [always
a relative term!] of installing an
I’m mostly with Damian here – I’m excited by your (Urs’ et al.) work, and I
always wanted to look at least into the notation fonts, but will probably never
need any of the more sophisticated functions.
My personal needs seldom go further than song and choir sheets, and so far I
rarely got custo
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 7:40 AM Andrew Bernard
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> Like Urs, I get the impression that the effort on OLL is not worth the
> return, as hardly anybody seems to use it and there appears to be
> little interest. This is very disappointing. So, may I ask - it is
> worth me
I agree with Kieren. A “Help” button in Frescobaldi that could show you
documentation about each feature would be great. I find it easier to just go
and search the LSR (which gives relevant results to what I’m trying to do, with
each snippet documented and exemplified), than trying to know what
Simon Albrecht writes:
>> On 10.10.20 14:11, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>>> Dear Karsten and list,
>>>
>>> On 22.09.20 22:40, Karsten Reincke wrote:
5) I've learned, that all(?) of you consider this an untenable if
not silly position and that the PDFs and midi-files compiled by
Lilypond
Hi,
Am 10.10.20 um 15:39 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
Since Urs has stepped down from OLL work for personal reasons, as
somebody who has written code for OLL, and contributed some snippets
of some utility, I have been considering taking it all over. I have
proposed to make a new domain openlilylib.sp
There's a term for it. Necroposting! Seriously!
Andrew
On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 at 02:24, David Kastrup wrote:
> Two weeks? I've replied on occasion to threads that were 10 years old,
> basically because threads tends to be archived and turn up on keyword
> searches.
Hi Andrew,
thanks for taking over the OLL management. In the last few weeks I did
not have much time to follow the discussions on the list. Seems I've
missed something important...
I think OLL is a valuable tool that is definitely worth to be kept
alive. In the past, I have made some contributio
Hello fellow LilyPonders,
I was engraving a piece of chant in modern notation recently, and
discovered that none of the custodes will draw a ledger for middle C (C4)
or A5, notes beyond the 5-line staff. These notes do occur in chant and
polyphony.
Is there a workaround for this? Or have I missed
> Am 10.10.2020 um 17:49 schrieb Andrew Bernard :
>
> There's a term for it. Necroposting! Seriously!
I’m proud of my necromancer badge on stackexchange ;D
HR
Hello All,
Since Urs has stepped down from OLL work for personal reasons, as
somebody who has written code for OLL, and contributed some snippets
of some utility, I have been considering taking it all over. I have
proposed to make a new domain openlilylib.space, move to Gitlab.
establish a websit
Le 10/10/2020 à 19:11, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
And now suddenly the thread about
licencing has risen again, a topic which I find absurd and I would
refuse to countenance it for any OLL work ongoing that I would be
doing. It seems that thread is trying to actively discourage OLL use.
Like Urs,
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 15:40, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Since Urs has stepped down from OLL work for personal reasons, as
> somebody who has written code for OLL, and contributed some snippets
> of some utility, I have been considering taking it all over. I have
> proposed to make a
> On 10 Oct 2020, at 15:39, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
> So, may I ask - it is
> worth me continuing the development and maintenance of OLL?
There is a file definitions.ily which allows the Smufl Bravura font to be used
with LilyPond, which useful for example for Helmholtz-Ellis accidentals. The
Hi all,
re:
> I use at least parts of it (mainly the edition engraver, break sets and the
> shapeII function) whenever I work with LilyPond
and
> There is a file definitions.ily which allows the Smufl Bravura font to be
> used with LilyPond, which useful for example for Helmholtz-Ellis accide
Hello All,
Thanks to those providing encouraging words regarding OLL.
As a result, I have registered openlilylib.space and I'll put up a
website dedicated to OLL shortly. I use the ,space TLD for all my
work, as openlilylib.org has not been released. Besides, I don't think
OLL is really a dot org
24 matches
Mail list logo
