RE: spurious partial in 2nd repeat abc->ly

2021-02-20 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Joe, I have made some minor changes to conform with performance. See the attached. The code has a great deal of “stuff” that is not necessary (from the source?). Mark From: Joe McCool [mailto:tangent.gard...@googlemail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2021 12:42 AM To: Mark Stephen Mro

RE: spurious partial in 2nd repeat abc->ly

2021-02-20 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Joe, Some thoughts on the score. Repeats must have complete measures. Note Part A. It starts with an upbeat (one eighth) and ends with 5 eighths. This makes a complete measure. Parts B and C do not have complete measures. The anacrusis in each is somewhat of an orphan. It does not make perf

Re: spurious partial in 2nd repeat abc->ly

2021-02-20 Thread Joe McCool via LilyPond user discussion
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 19:45, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Joe, > Thanks for the help Mark et al. > > > The second repeated section starts with a partial measure. > But there is no \partial there in the source code, hence my problem. With the source as shown in my original post the resulting