Re: ottava spanner terminates at the end of the note, not the end of the bar

2022-05-13 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2022-05-13 8:28 pm, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: The ottava spanner terminates at the end of the note, not at the end of the bar. How to change this? Screenshots attached. Consider the following: \version "2.22.0" \relative c'' { % Be careful not to stop the ottava too soon. \ot

Re: An issue with kerning in a defined dynamic "sfffz" solved

2022-05-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Some time ago I wrote saying that I could not get the marking > "sfffz" to kern properly. Someone replied that it did for them, and > I let it sit there, waiting until I needed a solution, which point I > have now reached. I have been slow and dense in recognising where > the issue lies - I am

An issue with kerning in a defined dynamic "sfffz" solved

2022-05-13 Thread Paul Hodges
Some time ago I wrote saying that I could not get the marking "sfffz" to kern properly.  Someone replied that it did for them, and I let it sit there, waiting until I needed a solution, which point I have now reached.  I have been slow and dense in recognising where the issue lies - I am using t

Re: Expressive marks

2022-05-13 Thread Mario Bolognani
Thanks Xavier, it is a simpler proposal even if the result may not be satisfactory… Best Mario Bolognani Inviato da iPhone > Il giorno 13 mag 2022, alle ore 10:14, Xavier Scheuer > ha scritto: > >  > On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 09:25, Mario Bolognani > wrote: > > > > Any idea on how to obtai

Re: Expressive marks

2022-05-13 Thread Mario Bolognani
Many thanks Richard for your suggestion. I’ll try to understand. Best Mario Inviato da iPhone > Il giorno 13 mag 2022, alle ore 14:58, Richard Shann > ha scritto: > > On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 14:06 +0200, Stephan Schöll wrote: >> I'm wondering if we need 340 lines of Scheme code or if we could

Alternate Notation Fonts

2022-05-13 Thread josh
I am having difficulty using alternative fonts. I believe that I have followed the fonts documentation correctly however I am not seeing results. I am trying to use the available "profondo" and "improviso" fonts. I am using version 2.22.1 and I have all of the files correctly installed to the

Re: top-level markup in Scheme

2022-05-13 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le 13/05/2022 à 15:30, Valentin Petzel a écrit : Hello Werner, if you intend to create Markup- or Score-Section from Scheme you might want to directly invoke (add-text some-markup) and (add-score some-score). This would allow you to cleanly handle stuff like inserting multiple markups and scor

Re: top-level markup in Scheme

2022-05-13 Thread Valentin Petzel
Hello Werner, if you intend to create Markup- or Score-Section from Scheme you might want to directly invoke (add-text some-markup) and (add-score some-score). This would allow you to cleanly handle stuff like inserting multiple markups and scores at the same time from a bit of scheme code. In

Re: Expressive marks

2022-05-13 Thread Richard Shann
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 14:06 +0200, Stephan Schöll wrote: > I'm wondering if we need 340 lines of Scheme code or if we could / > why we can't use the TrillSpanner and just eliminate the "tr" prefix > and leave the wiggy line, yes, that's good if you want exactly that wiggley line - the 340 lines of

Re: Expressive marks

2022-05-13 Thread Stephan Schöll
I'm wondering if we need 340 lines of Scheme code or if we could / why we can't use the TrillSpanner and just eliminate the "tr" prefix and leave the wiggy line, something based on (but not working since I don't understand Scheme lists thoroughly): \relative c'' {   \once \override TrillSpanner.b

Re: top-level markup in Scheme

2022-05-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> On the other hand, a LilyPond input file containing only >> >> ``` >> #(make-italic-markup "foo") >> ``` >> >> prints nothing. I now wonder how I can modify the latter to make >> it actually work – what is the 'appropriate hook'? > > s/#/$ This did the trick, thanks! Reading the documenta

Re: top-level markup in Scheme

2022-05-13 Thread Jean Abou Samra
> Le 13 mai 2022 à 11:44, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > >  >>> What is the Scheme equivalent to a top-level markup like >>> >>> ``` >>> \markup \italic "foo" >>> ``` >>> >>> ? I can't find it in the documentation. >> >> I am not a fan of the markup macro, but of course >> >> (make-italic-ma

Re: top-level markup in Scheme

2022-05-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> What is the Scheme equivalent to a top-level markup like >> >> ``` >> \markup \italic "foo" >> ``` >> >> ? I can't find it in the documentation. > > I am not a fan of the markup macro, but of course > > (make-italic-markup "foo") > > will also work. Thanks. > It is not clear what you mean

Re: top-level markup in Scheme

2022-05-13 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG writes: > What is the Scheme equivalent to a top-level markup like > > ``` > \markup \italic "foo" > ``` > > ? I can't find it in the documentation. \void \displayScheme \markup \italic "foo" outputs (markup #:italic "foo") I am not a fan of the markup macro, but of course (m

top-level markup in Scheme

2022-05-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
What is the Scheme equivalent to a top-level markup like ``` \markup \italic "foo" ``` ? I can't find it in the documentation. Werner

Re: Expressive marks

2022-05-13 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 09:25, Mario Bolognani wrote: > > Any idea on how to obtain this kind of expressive marks? > > Many thanks for any useful suggestion Hello, I would probably use a TrillSpanner without "tr." left text. \relative c'' { \override TrillSpanner.bound-details.left.text = #'()

Re: Expressive marks

2022-05-13 Thread Richard Shann
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 09:12 +0200, Mario Bolognani wrote: > Any idea on how to obtain this kind of expressive marks? There is a thread about this which I was involved in, the code that resulted is here in Denemo's source LilyPond files: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=denemo.git;a=blob;f=ac

Expressive marks

2022-05-13 Thread Mario Bolognani
Any idea on how to obtain this kind of expressive marks? Many thanks for any useful suggestion Mario Bolognani baroquemusic.it