Hi,
while debugging some files I'm interested in the log only, thus I'd
like to avoid creating any other output.
$ lilypond -dlog-file=AAALOG --formats=#f
-ddelete-intermediate-files file-1.ly file-2.ly
still returns .ps-files.
What's the correct command?
Thanks,
Harm
Le 23/12/2022 à 10:35, Thomas Morley a écrit :
Hi,
while debugging some files I'm interested in the log only, thus I'd
like to avoid creating any other output.
$ lilypond -dlog-file=AAALOG --formats=#f
-ddelete-intermediate-files file-1.ly file-2.ly
still returns .ps-files.
What's the correc
Hi all. I am building a score with a lot of tied whole notes, and I'd like
to make it more concise by using breves. However, I am clearly not
understanding how to use them properly.
Example using ties:
\version "2.22.2"
\score {
\new Staff \relative {
\clef treble
\new Voice \
Le 23/12/2022 à 16:50, Dave Seidel a écrit :
fis1\breve
This contains
- fis : a pitch,
- 1 : a duration, whole note,
- \breve : another duration, breve.
Therefore, the "fis" and "1" go together, as pitches and durations
always do, and the "\breve" is alone without a pitch, which tells
LilyP
Hello everyone,
I'm working on a function that prints a personal type of tremolo.
This function has four arguments, the first and the last are optional.
The first is actually optional, as you can see in the minimal exemple
attached. The last, instead, is problematic: if I omit it, there is an
error
Le 23/12/2022 à 17:54, Rip _Mus a écrit :
Hello everyone,
I'm working on a function that prints a personal type of tremolo.
This function has four arguments, the first and the last are optional.
The first is actually optional, as you can see in the minimal exemple
attached. The last, instead, is
Bernhard
Go to
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-keyboards
Scroll down to "Cross staff stems"
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Am Fr., 23. Dez. 2022 um 15:53 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
>
> Le 23/12/2022 à 10:35, Thomas Morley a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > while debugging some files I'm interested in the log only, thus I'd
> > like to avoid creating any other output.
> >$ lilypond -dlog-file=AAALOG --formats=#f
> > -ddel
Hi
I'm making a setting of some music with repeated melodies. The dynamics on
the second repeat are slightly different in that some appear to have been
omitted from the first time. I'd like to use the same code, but to show the
"possibly omitted" dynamic marks in a different color. I have tried the
> Le 23 déc. 2022 à 20:56, Paul McKay a écrit :
>
>
> Hi
> I'm making a setting of some music with repeated melodies. The dynamics on
> the second repeat are slightly different in that some appear to have been
> omitted from the first time. I'd like to use the same code, but to show the
>
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.25.0, the start of
the next development cycle. This is termed a development release, but
these are usually reliable for testing new features and recent bug
fixes. However, if you require stability, we recommend using version
2.24.0, the current sta
Hi,
I'll post this to the Frescobaldi team as well.
I'm running Frescobaldi 3.2 and Lilypond 2.24.0. Frescobaldi isn't aware of
\section, \sectionLabel, or \fine. There may be others but these are the
ones I've noticed. To explain a little more, none of these commands appear
in the dropdown lists
I have a section for chords and a section for melody. Each has
"\repeat volta 2" and two blocks in an "\alternative". I've reduced to
what I think is a pretty minimum MWE, and still get:
|$ lilypond mwe.ly
|GNU LilyPond 2.22.1
|Processing `mwe.ly'
|Parsing...
|warning: More alt
Hey Kevin,
I identified that this was due to the measure mark "|" you inserted on
line 31
\alternative {
{ c4.( c8) e16[ f16] }
{ c4.( c4.) } |
}
Since this was outside of the second block, it was interpreted as a
third block, thus lilypond had three alternative blocks.
You may a
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 10:25 PM William Rehwinkel <
will...@williamrehwinkel.net> wrote:
> Hey Kevin,
>
> I identified that this was due to the measure mark "|" you inserted on
> line 31
>
> \alternative {
> { c4.( c8) e16[ f16] }
> { c4.( c4.) } |
>}
>
> Since this was outside of t
15 matches
Mail list logo