> With not too much work, you could get emacs to do all of that I
> think.
Well, it would be great if someone could convert the LilyPond mode of
Emacs so that it uses the new 'tree-sitter' interface:
https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/
(look at the 'Playground' link to get a feeling
With not too much work, you could get emacs to do all of that I think. But
my guess is that there's no reason to panic yet. I don't see frescobaldi
magically disappearing.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024, 10:45 PM Dirck Nagy wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Reading that last thread about Frescobaldi and its possible
Hi all
Reading that last thread about Frescobaldi and its possible disappearance from
Mac is causing me to panic. Jean, I did not realize that you were the last
person to seriously work on Frescobaldi / Mac.
I use Mac exclusively, and Frescobaldi / Lilypond is very important to me.
FYI,
> [...] the snippet is _very_ useful, and certainly much easier to use
> than the lsr snippet.
Please submit the example as a new LSR snippet.
Note that we already have a (slightly different) issue for that:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/833
It would certainly help if you
Yeah, it works if I just replace add-grob-definition with:
#(define (add-grob-definition grob-name grob-entry)
(set! all-grob-descriptions
(cons ((@@ (lily) completize-grob-entry)
(cons grob-name grob-entry))
all-grob-descriptions)))
That said, the
On 2024-04-29 7:50 am, Pierre-Luc Gauthier wrote:
Can a markup command introspect its direction ?
Is it possible to set in a markup command some conditionals (not paper
related) ?
\version "2.25.15"
#(define-markup-command (conditionalMrkp layout props)
()
(interpret-markup layout props
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Kevin Cole wrote:
> "predefined-guitar-ninth-fretboards.ly" get the job done. But on a few
> occasions I've had to resort to studying some online tutorial and
> constructing the diagrams from scratch.
Not a complete solution, but my chord database at
Hi.
I'm currently using 2.24.2.
I'm not a guitarist, and most of the people I play with are by their
own admission rather amateur.
For most tunes that I transcribe the built-in
"predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly" and, on one occasion,
"predefined-guitar-ninth-fretboards.ly" get the job done. But
Can a markup command introspect its direction ?
Is it possible to set in a markup command some conditionals (not paper
related) ?
\version "2.25.15"
#(define-markup-command (conditionalMrkp layout props)
()
(interpret-markup layout props #{
\markup {
%\if #DOWN
"↑"
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le lundi 29 avril 2024 à 06:31 -0500, Jason Yip a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone know how to manually set the midi channel # for a staff to
>> something other than the default of channel 0/1? Without having to
>> create dummy staffs with just `s256` as the voice
Hi Kieren,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 3:12 PM Kieren MacMillan <
kie...@kierenmacmillan.info> wrote:
>
> 1. Any thoughts about what the optimal package is?
>
I use TexStudio for all my TeX work, and it's excellent. Here:
https://texstudio.sourceforge.net
(shoutout to extremely old-skool
Hi all,
> Fortunately for me, I'm using lualatex already, so that worked. I do indeed
> lose point-and-click, but it's good to know that if frescobaldi stops working
> I at least have a backup.
I’ve been considering moving fully to *lula*tex ever since Urs demonstrated his
lyluatexmp
On 2024-04-29 06:48, Jean Abou Samra - jean(a)abou-samra.fr wrote:
You can do \set Score.midiChannelMapping = #'voice as an alternative to that.
Also \new Voice { } should work (untested) instead of \new Voice { s256 }.
I don't think there's a better way.
Setting midiChannelMapping property
Le lundi 29 avril 2024 à 06:31 -0500, Jason Yip a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know how to manually set the midi channel # for a staff to
> something other than the default of channel 0/1? Without having to
> create dummy staffs with just `s256` as the voice content preceding the
> desired
Hi,
Does anyone know how to manually set the midi channel # for a staff to
something other than the default of channel 0/1? Without having to
create dummy staffs with just `s256` as the voice content preceding the
desired staff? The staff in question usually only has one voice, so I
modified
Hi Jean,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 1:17 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> lilypond-book isn't called by LaTeX, it's a preprocessor that you first
> have
> to run on a .lytex file to get a .tex file, then you compile that .tex file
> with TeX.
>
> Consider lyLuaTeX, which is an alternative that runs
> yeah, I just had the package-manager in gentoo downgrade to the previous
> version of snappy, and then filed a bug with gentoo. It's a workaround for
> now.
>
> As another workaround, I'm trying to get my latex editor to use lilypond-book,
> but since it's on a nonstandard path, I don't seem
Hi Jean,
yeah, I just had the package-manager in gentoo downgrade to the previous
version of snappy, and then filed a bug with gentoo. It's a workaround for
now.
As another workaround, I'm trying to get my latex editor to use
lilypond-book, but since it's on a nonstandard path, I don't seem able
> It gets a bit more complicated now. See this bug:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278633
>
> That bug is for freeBSD, but I expect it applies to other
> distros as well (it certainly applies to gentoo, as I'm
> getting the exact same error). In short, snappy (an archiver)
>
OK, so maybe I should just move lilypond work into my LaTeX IDE for the
time being. Since my lilypond installation isn't on the system PATH, how do
I include it as part of a .tex document to get access to the lilypond-book
commands?
Cheers,
N. Andrew Walsh
er/ihn/ihm/sein | he/him/his
Berlin
> Would it maybe make things a bit easier to leave the whole MacOS
> business aside and take care of the Linux-specific stuff first?
Linux is not really causing us any specific problems. Packaging is a lot
easier, thanks to Linux distributions and Flatpak.
The only wrinkle is the oddities on
I use it on Sonoma without issues.
Med vänlig hälsning / Kind regards
Mats-Olof Liljegren
e-pro
Oskarsvägen 11B
702 14 Örebro
Tel 070 360 19 19
e-post m...@e-pro.se
web: http://e-pro.se
> 29 apr. 2024 kl. 11:40 skrev Robert Garrigos :
>
> I cannot use Frescobaldi on Mac Sonoma (not working),
I cannot use Frescobaldi on Mac Sonoma (not working), so I went for Visual
Studio Code, with some lilypond plugins, and I have to say that it offers
everything I need
Robert
> El 28 abr. 2024, a les 13:57, Jean Abou Samra va
> escriure:
>
>> Is Frescobaldi the most common tool on Linux, or
It gets a bit more complicated now. See this bug:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278633
That bug is for freeBSD, but I expect it applies to other distros as well
(it certainly applies to gentoo, as I'm getting the exact same error). In
short, snappy (an archiver) was updated to
Would it maybe make things a bit easier to leave the whole MacOS
business aside and take care of the Linux-specific stuff first? And
what actually about Windows - out of curiosity. I myself am a Linux
user (Mint), and so far Frescobaldi is still running flawlessly.
And - another question out of
25 matches
Mail list logo
