Ok, I did find the solution someone gave me some time ago. I still wonder:
1. Why the default uses the redundant \segnoMark.
2. Why there isn't a more direct option for what I believe is the more
common notation.
Paul
On 6/8/24 11:42 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
Using the repeat segno structure h
Using the repeat segno structure how can I eliminate the redundant segno
mark in
D.S. [segnoMark] al Fine ?
I can't quickly find any examples in printed music that has the
redundant segno mark. D.S. aleady means "dal segno" or "from the sign."
I don't have a copy of Gould but Wikipedia and
Dear Richard,
I'm not sure what you mean, but I think I would do something like this
for putting multiple clefs together.
-William
% --
\version "2.25.16"
\relative c' {
\override Staff.Clef.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\override Staff.Clef.text = \markup { \raise
On Sat, 2024-06-08 at 08:09 -0700, Knute Snortum wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 7:03 AM Richard Shann
> wrote:
> > I think it's not uncommon for two clefs to appear side by side at
> > the
> > start of a piece (e.g. when a piano piece starts with both staves
> > in
> > bass clef so as to alert th
On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 7:03 AM Richard Shann
wrote:
> I think it's not uncommon for two clefs to appear side by side at the
> start of a piece (e.g. when a piano piece starts with both staves in
> bass clef so as to alert the pianist that the upper staff is not in
> treble clef).
> How is this do
I think it's not uncommon for two clefs to appear side by side at the
start of a piece (e.g. when a piano piece starts with both staves in
bass clef so as to alert the pianist that the upper staff is not in
treble clef).
How is this done in LilyPond?
Richard Shann
> Thankfully, it should be trivial to make the changes. The question
> now is what reference glyph is the best?
If you have an argument, the shape should enclose it symmetrically
(more or less) – it is up to you how sophisticated the algorithm is to
do that in the visually most pleasing way (i.
Typically fonts use x-height as a general design parameter. I don't know if
you find that helpful in this interesting project, but it is a point of
possible useage.
Regards,
Shane Brandes
On Sat, Jun 8, 2024, 5:47 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> Thank you both, Werner and Valentin, for taking the time t
Thank you both, Werner and Valentin, for taking the time to look at my
submission.
When I was playing around with drawing shapes, I was thinking paper
scale not text scale. This was inspired by Paolo's desire to draw
arbitrary arrows and things.
Because of that, I presumed the end user woul
> I was playing around with drawing regular polygons, which led to
> creating a new markup command with several configurable options.
> (Some of these options are inherited via the built-in \polygon
> command.)
>
> There might be a few things to tighten up, but I believe it is in a
> pretty work
Hello Aaron,
I would think there is little actual need to specify the size as parameter.
After all, you have the font-size proportion, using which you can control size
by \fontsize ...
You’d simply need to replace size by (magstep font-size). Alternatively if you
want to match text you could i
11 matches
Mail list logo
