uch useful
Cheers
L
--
Luca Fascione
Aha. I _also_ removed the use of m-chordify and now it all works as you
said.
Great, slur problem solved.
And thanks again
--
Luca Fascione
(as a test I also added \remove New_fingering_engraver and all the
fingering went away, do it is doing something)
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 4:06 PM Luca Fascione wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 1:31 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Have you tried my other suggestion of j
fingering" for
music that has gone through
the (make-music 'EventChord 'elements (list m)) part
Am I doing it wrong, maybe?
L
--
Luca Fascione
:
> Luca Fascione writes:
>
> > Hi David, I just tried out your suggestion, and it works quite well.
> > One issue I found is that it moves slurs from "above the beam" to "at
> > the notehead" (in fact, it seems to me the slur is actually "at the
> >
ca
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:02 PM David Kastrup wrote:
> Luca Fascione writes:
>
> > Ok, so. I tested this eventChords idea, and it seems to behave as if this
> > a-4
> > was entered as this
> > -4
> > but unfortunately I actually need this
> >
&g
Ok, so. I tested this eventChords idea, and it seems to behave as if this
a-4
was entered as this
-4
but unfortunately I actually need this
how can I achieve that?
Thanks a lot David,
Luca
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:19 PM Luca Fascione wrote:
> Thus might do it yes.
> Does even
Thus might do it yes.
Does even chords transform single notes into chords, does nothing to chords
and leaves untouched everything else? (Key changes, time markings changes,
all that stuff)
Thanks David!
L
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024, 21:01 David Kastrup, wrote:
> Luca Fascione writes:
>
chords?
I think the `\parallelMusic` macro works more or less this way, maybe.
Any pointers to code/snippets to use for inspiration would be greatly
appreciated.
Many thanks
Luca
--
Luca Fascione
Lovely, thank you Knute
L
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, 16:11 Knute Snortum, wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 6:34 AM Luca Fascione
> wrote:
>
>> Did this change between 22 and 24?
>> Is there somewhere I can go to see the implementation for the LSR that
>> used 2.22?
>&g
hat. I used it
> once to put a bracket around a cord. You just have to override one of the
> properties to move the endpoints in the negative direction as well as an x
> offset for the closing side.
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023, 7:35 AM Luca Fascione wrote:
>
>> Did
Did this change between 22 and 24?
Is there somewhere I can go to see the implementation for the LSR that used
2.22?
L
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, 15:07 Knute Snortum, wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:35 AM Luca Fascione
> wrote:
>
>> Also,
>> it doesn't seem to actually wo
:4:19: error: bad grob property path
\once \override
Parentheses.stencils = #(lambda (grob)
paren_tests.ly:10:19: error: bad grob property path
\once \override
Parentheses.stencils = #(lambda (grob)
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:29 PM Luca Fascione wrote:
> Yes, I was thinking more about p
ri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:58 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le vendredi 17 novembre 2023 à 11:44 +0100, Luca Fascione a écrit :
>
> Nice. Thanks Jean. This solves it for my current score
>
> In general, what's the background for this not working though?
> You seem to imply it's inte
to
gauge delimiter sizes?
Cheers
L
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:18 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le vendredi 17 novembre 2023 à 10:58 +0100, Luca Fascione a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Try
>
> https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=902
>
>
--
Luca Fascione
t's just the
> standard General MIDI percussion keymap.
>
> At 10:52 on 17 Nov 2023, Luca Fascione wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm converting a MIDI file to lilypond with a drumset track.
>
> > My process goes through MusicXML, but the `musicxml2ly` script I have
> > (2.22
in parentheses (chords are there but parens are not)
Also,
\new ChordNames { \chordmode { \parenthesize { a:m7 } } }
produces the chord symbol and no parentheses
\parenthesisOpenSymbol also is rejected inside \chordmode
Cheers
L
--
Luca Fascione
, the mapping lilypond uses to go from the percussion notes to
its MIDI output is all I need (and then I can reverse that). If someone
could get me a breadcrumb to that, that'd be grand.
Thanks
Luca
--
Luca Fascione
without
> barlines in the beginning.
>
'msorry what's that? Could you show me?
What version of lilypond are you using?
Thanks again,
L
--
Luca Fascione
} \break
\repeat unfold 4 { c c c c }
}
\score {
\m
}
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 3:17 PM Luca Fascione wrote:
> Noice, thanks Leo, this is enough of a workaround for my current state,
> thanks for figuring that out
>
> Cheers,
> Luca
>
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2022, 14:04
wn you can work
> around it by printing the barlines at the beginning of staves too, by adding
> \defineBarLine "|" #'("|" "|" "|”)
> to the layout block.
>
> HTH
> /Leo
>
> 22 nov. 2022 kl. 13:30 skrev Luca Fascione :
>
> Ok, so, smal
sible
}
m = \relative c'' {
c4 c c c | \break
4 cis cis cis |
4 cis cis cis |
\repeat unfold 2 { c c c c } \break
4 c c c |
4 cis cis cis |
\repeat unfold 2 { c c c c } \break
\repeat unfold 4 { c c c c }
}
\score {
\m
}
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 1:15 PM Luc
It seems to have something to do with this:
\override Clef.break-visibility = #'#(#f #f #f)
I'm working on shortening the source
L
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:25 PM Luca Fascione wrote:
> Ha. Ok, I'll whittle it down to something small that repros it then.
> Thanks Leo!
> L
>
>
is probably needed to solve this. Try to make a minimal example.
> That said, one could guess that it could have something to do with
> break-alignments.
>
> Best
> /Leo
>
> 22 nov. 2022 kl. 11:27 skrev Luca Fascione :
>
> Hi all,
> In a sheet I'm working on I'm o
[image: image.png]
--
Luca Fascione
Awesome, thanks Jean!
L
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022, 00:30 Jean Abou Samra, wrote:
> Le 20/11/2022 à 00:02, Luca Fascione a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> > I have some 2 voice music coming from musicxml like this
> >
> > 4 8. 16 ~ ~ 2.
> >
> > and I'd like to split it int
baldi, but I couldn't find a transformation for this purpose)
Cheers,
Luca
--
Luca Fascione
Yes! Thanks Jean, I don't know why I didn't see this myself.
Cheers!
L
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, 00:27 Jean Abou Samra, wrote:
> Le 16/11/2022 à 23:44, Luca Fascione a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> > is there a way to run the chord naming logic from two voices (in my
> > case bass an
that source
Cheers
Luca
--
Luca Fascione
What if instead of `\upbeat` (which is weirdly named when used in the
end-of-music/phrase/hymn/passage scenario) this new thing is just called
`\partialMusic`?
It's backward compatible, does something easy to use in some simple
scenarios, leaves everything else in place for more refined use cases,
What if you rotate them instead?
Rename the current \partial \partialDuration,
convert.ly now is just s/partial/partialDuration/
and \partial always takes music from now on
It's the same as Werner said, but keeps the good name
L
On Sun, 20 Mar 2022, 08:24 Werner LEMBERG, wrote:
>
> > A
Hi Valentin,
thanks for the super prompt reply!
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 5:34 PM Valentin Petzel wrote:
> So instead of doing the assoc-set! you might want to do something like
>
> (ly:grob-set-property! grob 'details `((beamed-lengths . ,stem-bmlgths)
> . ,detls))
>
For my edification,
want
> to
> know what exact properties a grob has, you can look in define-grobs.scm.
> And
> similar stuff.
>
> And if you encounter something you really do not understand, ask the list.
> We’ve got some really marvellous people here who appear to know about
> everything you mig
"scm/". Vague pointers like that are hopefully all I'll need.
Many thanks,
Luca
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 6:49 PM Luca Fascione wrote:
> Yes exactly, because of how our finger to note relation works, the
> enhancement in readability with the indication right at the head is
> e
t; rather confusing, as there is no monotonic relating between finger and
> pitch.
> As such I suppose guitar people would want to use fingerings with left or
> right
> orientations in chords anyway.
>
> Cheers,
> Valentin
>
> Am Montag, 21. Februar 2022, 17:47:58 CET schrieb L
Petzel wrote:
> No, not nescessarily. If we want all Fingerings on top or below there is
> no real benefit of doing the chord thing. In fact doing that leads to the
> exact same issue of the fingering for d being next to the other ones.
>
> Cheers,
> Valentin
>
> 21.02.202
eam (this does still get messed up by
> very
> slanted Beams, it might be useful to also get a reference to the Beam grob
> to
> factor in the angle of the Beam). With this we can estimate the free space
> between NoteHead and Beam, and depending on this space, shift the
> Fingering
&
rd some note heads are
> on
> the other side of the Stem the alignment of something like -1-2-3
> would
> change (disregarding that it wouldn’t even be clear what note head to use).
>
> Cheers,
> Valentin
>
> Am Montag, 21. Februar 2022, 09:19:30 CET schrieb Luca Fascione:
> > Hi
Uhr schrieb Luca Fascione <
> l.fasci...@gmail.com>:
>
> > a) I'm looking for a way to get the fingerings where I want them without
> > using one-note-chord tricks
>
> Well, for Fingerings not in chord, like b-1 or -2-1 X-parent
> is NoteColumn _not_ Note
here.
>
> Valentin
>
> Am Sonntag, 20. Februar 2022, 21:17:31 CET schrieb Luca Fascione:
> > So... would anybody be able to lend a hand here please?
> >
> > Many thanks
> > Luca
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 7:49 PM Luca Fascione
> wrote:
> >
ing steps a to f", I'm happy to
have at it, under somebody's guidance.
Given that solving this problem is a need of mine, I feel it's completely
fine that it ends up being my cost to fix it,
all I'm looking for is a few breadcrumbs.
Thanks again,
L
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 9:54 PM Jean Abou S
So... would anybody be able to lend a hand here please?
Many thanks
Luca
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 7:49 PM Luca Fascione wrote:
> Hello,
> sorry for the double-post, I'm unsure whether this should go to -user or
> -devel.
>
> I'm looking for some guidance to set up fingering on c
Hi Thomas,
maybe this can be handy: the `moreutils` package has a utility called `ts`,
that will prepend a timestamp to each line of output.
If you pipe the output of your compilation into it, you can get timing
information quite easily, here's an example:
% ls | ts -s "%H:%M:%.S"
00:00:00.13
\layout {}
}
%%
You can see I have hardcoded the form of Cmaj7 to render as Cmaj7/B, but
the spacing feels like a step in the right direction (admittedly the
kerning could use work, but it feels like a reasonable compromise)
I have attached the corresponding pdf I get, so you ca
> I have forwarded it there but I strongly suggest you subscribe at
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user to automatically
>> receive any replies.
>>
>> Best
>> Urs
>>
>> Am 20.11.2015 um 10:46 schrieb LilyPond blog contact form:
&g
ith the actual font, of
> course, only with LilyPond’s default Sans font. So you’ll likely have to
> adjust the numerical values in lines 6 and 27–29 to taste. See <
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/text-markup-commands>
> for documentation on the markup commands
Hi Simon,
so this actually works rather well, I ended up taking the rotation out, as
with the actual font you get a better sense of the nib direction with the
original orientation of the solidus, nonetheless I do really like your
suggestion of using a slightly larger size, I find it does help a
47 matches
Mail list logo
