On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:35:21PM -0700, Hans Forbrich wrote:
I personally think many people go about the evaluation totally backwards.
They first ask 'how easy is it to get started'.
Well, that seems to be symptomatic for most software today, even in
professional software development
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 00:41:18 +0200, Erik a dit :
Is there at all any list of links to lilypond-related software anywhere? There
are lots of lilypond related things Out There, which new users should be
aware of (such as editors with special lilypond modes, helper scripts, other
music
Hallo, everyone - I'm new here.
I'm not a member of the list - at least not yet. So I'm not even sure if
this will get through, and whether I will be able to read any response on the
web site archives. (If not, I guess I'll have to join, then submit this message
again.)
I'm
At 11:58 PM 4/7/2004 +1000, you wrote:
In general, each of the programs I named above seems to have problems
for
me, at least insofar as I have gleaned information about how they work
(since I
do not have copies of any of them, and have tried only demo versions of older
versions of Finale and
Hello, Michael!
because I have hard disk space problems and this is a very active list
Don't forget the archives (searchable!) and digest mode... =)
Finale:
User interface seems awkward and difficult, not sufficiently
keyboard-based.
Oh, I got pretty good with the keyboard (even did a fair bit
Kieren Richard MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3. If I adopt any music notation program, it will be used
on a laptop computer, with its lack of a separate numeric
keypad.
Again, text editor says it all.
In general, how configurable is LilyPond for different
methods of usage?
Pretty
Michael Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hallo, everyone - I'm new here.
Welcome.
I'm not a member of the list - at least not yet. So I'm not
even sure if this will get through, and whether I will be able to
read any response on the web site archives. (If not, I guess I'll
Wait a second,
truthfully all the applications are pretty much notation programs, not
composition programs.
Lilypond is music engraving with all the bells and whistles minus the
graphical interface.
It takes some getting used to and could be a bit difficult for a novice
to use if the notation
I personally think many people go about the evaluation totally backwards.
They first ask 'how easy is it to get started'.
Unfortunately once the honeymoon is over, then it's time to get serious and
accomplish some real tasks. Every 'easy to use' package I've seen quickly
grinds to a halt.
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Don't forget about the quick-note-insert mode (lyqi) in
Emacs. It provides a good bunch of things, can even
transpose and relativise parts.
I had never heard of this before. I just looked and don't know where to
find it in the manual. Is it there?
I did find it with
Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't forget about the quick-note-insert mode (lyqi) in
Emacs. It provides a good bunch of things, can even
transpose and relativise parts.
I had never heard of this before. I just looked and don't
know where to find it in the manual. Is it there?
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 23.58, Paul Scott wrote:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Don't forget about the quick-note-insert mode (lyqi) in
Emacs. It provides a good bunch of things, can even
transpose and relativise parts.
I had never heard of this before. I just looked and don't know where to
find
12 matches
Mail list logo
