Hi Urs,
> The problem with this is (as Harm pointed out already rather at the
> beginning of this thread) that there may be elements at the wrong size
> at the changing spot.
Easily fixed.
SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.19"
\header {
tagline = ##f
}
\layout {
indent = 0
\context {
Am 10.09.2016 um 16:29 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> I was hoping to be able to change staff sizes within a score without the
>> bizarre kludge of creating an entirely new score everytime the staff size
>> changes.
> I’m not sure “bizarre” was a necessary descriptor… On a mailing
Hi Michael,
> I was hoping to be able to change staff sizes within a score without the
> bizarre kludge of creating an entirely new score everytime the staff size
> changes.
I’m not sure “bizarre” was a necessary descriptor… On a mailing list (such as
this one) where people are generously
Looks like \stopStaff and \startStaff aren't needed. -Paul
\version "2.19.42"
\relative c' {
c d e f
\break
\magnifyStaff #2
c d e f
\break
\magnifyStaff #1
c d e f
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On 09/10/2016 10:04 AM, Michael Rivers wrote:
I was hoping to be able to change staff sizes within a score without the
bizarre kludge of creating an entirely new score everytime the staff size
changes. Many apologies for being unclear.
How about this? (Hmmm... the barlines are the wrong size
I was hoping to be able to change staff sizes within a score without the
bizarre kludge of creating an entirely new score everytime the staff size
changes. Many apologies for being unclear.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/changing-staff-size-throughout
Am 09.09.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> print an example of a scale in normal sized print,
>> followed by an arbitrary number of larger staves for students to draw their
>> own scales. That would require being able to change the size of a single
>> staff on the fly.
>
Hi Michael,
> print an example of a scale in normal sized print,
> followed by an arbitrary number of larger staves for students to draw their
> own scales. That would require being able to change the size of a single
> staff on the fly.
Not really…
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.19"
\paper {
their
own scales. That would require being able to change the size of a single
staff on the fly.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/changing-staff-size-throughout-a-score-tp194304p194387.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi Urs,
> "This OP's message" was mine:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-09/msg00144.html to
> which Michael replied, unfortunately without quoting.
Yes, I see that now. I meant Michael’s request — which, as we’ve said, Lily can
easily handle.
Apologies for the
Am 08.09.2016 um 22:06 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Urs,
>
>> We're talking about changing from one system to the next,
>> not about having staves of different size in parallel.
> You were talking about that in another thread… but where in this OP’s message
> was that restriction? Sorry if I
Hi Urs,
> We're talking about changing from one system to the next,
> not about having staves of different size in parallel.
You were talking about that in another thread… but where in this OP’s message
was that restriction? Sorry if I missed it.
> Indeed it seems Finale is the only "big" tool
Am 08.09.2016 um 21:46 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> I want to make the examples in regular sized staves and make the
>> lines for the student responses with larger staves.
> Like this?
>
> \version "2.19"
> \score {
> <<
> \new Staff \with { \magnifyStaff #1/2 } { \repeat
Hi Michael,
> I want to make the examples in regular sized staves and make the
> lines for the student responses with larger staves.
Like this?
\version "2.19"
\score {
<<
\new Staff \with { \magnifyStaff #1/2 } { \repeat unfold 4 c''1 }
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 4 c''1 }
>>
}
Of
is
the only notation software that handles changing staff sizes with ease. It
would be great if Lilypond could join it.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/changing-staff-size-throughout-a-score-tp194304p194331.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive
t;>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/setting-the-staff-size
>>>
>>> Trevor
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org>
>>> To: "lilypond-user" &
>> Trevor
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org>
>> To: "lilypond-user" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 11:40 PM
>> Subject: changing staff-size throughout
"Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org>
> To: "lilypond-user" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 11:40 PM
> Subject: changing staff-size throughout a score
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> is it possible to change the
day, September 07, 2016 11:40 PM
Subject: changing staff-size throughout a score
> Hi all,
>
> is it possible to change the size of the StaffSymbol along the way
> through a score? My impression is that
>
>\override Score.StaffSymbol.staff-space
>
> has an effect only wh
Hi all,
is it possible to change the size of the StaffSymbol along the way
through a score? My impression is that
\override Score.StaffSymbol.staff-space
has an effect only when applied in a \with block or at the very first
start of a Staff.
However, I don't see a reason for that
Thanks so much!
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Changing-Staff-Size-Without-Messing-Up-Fonts-tp188190p188224.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond
Change staff size first.
HTH
Am 7. März 2016 00:10:57 MEZ, schrieb kwpaprocki <kwpapro...@gmail.com>:
>Hello,
>
>I've been having trouble with changing staff size. I've been using
>this:
>
>#(set-global-staff-size 30)
>
>to change the staff size. When I do the
Hello,
I've been having trouble with changing staff size. I've been using this:
#(set-global-staff-size 30)
to change the staff size. When I do the text and notation fonts change back
to the lilypond defaults. How do I keep this from happening?
Thanks,
Kris
--
View this message
Kris,
On Sunday, March 6, 2016, kwpaprocki [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n188190...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been having trouble with changing staff size. I've been using this:
>
> #(set-global-staff-size 30)
>
> to change the staff size. When I do
Jérôme Plût plut.jer...@gmail.com writes:
Quinto Kalendas Augustas MMXV scripsit Kevin Barry :
Hi Jerome,
The most relevant part of the manuals for your question is probably here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/
changing-context-default-settings
It should answer
Quinto Kalendas Augustas MMXV scripsit Kevin Barry :
Hi Jerome,
The most relevant part of the manuals for your question is probably here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/
changing-context-default-settings
It should answer all of your questions (and there is even an
Hi Jerome,
The most relevant part of the manuals for your question is probably here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/changing-context-default-settings
It should answer all of your questions (and there is even an example of how
to store a \with block in a variable.
hth,
I saw in the documentation how to change the size of a single staff
(such as the solist part in a piano accompaniment score) with the
\with command. However, since I might need to do this for several
scores, I would like to factor out the \with snippet in a macro.
My question is therefore: is
Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Eby Mani eby...@yahoo.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: changing staff size in \score context
Eby Mani eby...@yahoo.com writes:
Thanks, the file compiled with multiple warning: cannot resolve rest
On 24 November 2012 09:18, Eby Mani eby...@yahoo.com wrote:
Oh, that is to combine rests of two choir voices on the same staff, as you
can see I'm using two voices per staff.
If i disable it, it shows no errors.
Is there a better way of combining rests the same without using \revert Rest
- Original Message -
From: Eby Mani eby...@yahoo.com
To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2012 8:18 AM
Subject: Re: changing staff size in \score context
Oh, that is to combine rests of two choir voices on the same staff, as you
can see
Eby Mani eby...@yahoo.com writes:
Thanks, the file compiled with multiple warning: cannot resolve rest
collision: rest direction not set errors in vocal part, where SA and
TB rests are combined.
*
global = {
[...]
\revert Rest #'direction
[...]
}
What's
Hi, I don't know how to change staff size in the following scenario, need to
reduce the size of Organ staff in the score which should be given to the choir
and vice versa for the Organist.
Are there any commands that can be used in \score context ?. I don't want to
mess anything where the
.1069038.n5.nabble.com/changing-staff-size-in-score-context-tp136641p136646.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
From: Eluze elu...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: changing staff size in \score context
Eby Mani wrote
Hi, I don't know how to change staff size in the following scenario, need
to reduce the size of Organ staff in the score which
Eluze elu...@gmail.com writes:
Eby Mani wrote
Hi, I don't know how to change staff size in the following scenario, need
to reduce the size of Organ staff in the score which should be given to
the choir and vice versa for the Organist.
Are there any commands that can be used in \score
sorry I mixed up the different syntaxes and didn't respect the version Eby
gave us
but I'm really fond of this new and practical feature (don't more need to
write *#*,* '*, *(* so many times …)
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/changing-staff-size
, November 21, 2012 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: changing staff size in \score context
Eluze elu...@gmail.com writes:
Eby Mani wrote
Hi, I don't know how to change staff size in the following scenario, need
to reduce the size of Organ staff in the score which should be given to
the choir and vice versa
this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/changing-staff-size-in-score-context-tp136641p136707.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:45 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes:
On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
That worked to avoid the error, but didn't seem quite right (since it
didn't seem to matter what values you fed it).
Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes:
On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:45 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes:
On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
That worked to avoid the error, but didn't seem quite right (since it
On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
On Mike's suggestion I also switched to using internal path stencils instead
of embedded PS. The only problem I ran into was using fill to get a filled
triangle. I used:
upTriangle =
#(ly:make-stencil
'(path 0.09
Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes:
On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
That worked to avoid the error, but didn't seem quite right (since it
didn't seem to matter what values you fed it). So I checked the
LilyPond source code (scm/output-ps.scm), and
On 1 nov. 2012, at 00:11, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
On Oct 31, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Paul,
postscript is scaled with global-staff-size only.
To work around you could use:
TwinNoteNoteHeads =
#(lambda (grob)
(let*
On 1 nov. 2012, at 12:44, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 1 nov. 2012, at 00:11, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
On Oct 31, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Paul,
postscript is scaled with global-staff-size only.
To work around you
Hello, I'm trying to increase the overall size of a given staff, as described
in the docs[1] using:
\new Staff \with {
fontSize = #2
\override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep 2)
\override NoteHead #'before-line-breaking = \TwinNoteNoteHeads
}
But I'm also using custom
2012/10/31 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com:
[...]
upTriangle =
#(ly:make-stencil
(list 'embedded-ps
gsave
currentpoint translate
newpath
[...]
Hi Paul,
postscript is scaled with global-staff-size only.
To work around you could use:
TwinNoteNoteHeads =
#(lambda
On 31 oct. 2012, at 20:27, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
Hello, I'm trying to increase the overall size of a given staff, as
described in the docs[1] using:
\new Staff \with {
fontSize = #2
\override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep 2)
\override NoteHead
On Oct 31, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Paul,
postscript is scaled with global-staff-size only.
To work around you could use:
TwinNoteNoteHeads =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((sz (ly:grob-property grob 'font-size 0.0))
(mult (magstep
David, you wrote Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:53 PM
I just saw the warning about staff spaces at the bottom of the
documentation page. The question remains, is this behavior
beneficial? If so, should the documentation and command wording
simply be reworked?
David, if you are willing to
Trevor,
I'll prepare a rewrite, perhaps this afternoon.
Thanks!
David
Trevor Daniels wrote:
David, you wrote Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:53 PM
I just saw the warning about staff spaces at the bottom of the
documentation page. The question remains, is this behavior
beneficial? If so,
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 08:57 -0500, David Stocker wrote:
Trevor,
I'll prepare a rewrite, perhaps this afternoon.
Thanks!
David
Trevor Daniels wrote:
David, you wrote Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:53 PM
I just saw the warning about staff spaces at the bottom of the
Hi Mats,
I hope you don't forget about
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=216
Hasn't this specific issue been solved by the \bookpart?
i.e., the original problem was that you couldn't produce different staff size
of different scores within the same book, but each \bookpart has
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 11:53 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Mats,
I hope you don't forget about
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=216
Hasn't this specific issue been solved by the \bookpart?
i.e., the original problem was that you couldn't produce different staff
Hi! Is it possible to change the staff size?
I found in the documentation only a command to change
the note size.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
This should do the trick:
#(set-global-staff-size 14)
or any other number, of course.
Jethro.
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Chris wrote:
Hi! Is it possible to change the staff size?
I found in the documentation only a command to change
the note size.
On 10.02.2010, at 17:17, Chris wrote:
Hi! Is it possible to change the staff size?
I found in the documentation only a command to change
the note size.
Where did you look? It's documented in the Learning Manual, the first
place to read when you start using LilyPond. Here it is:
Chris,
Have a look at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Setting-the-staff-size#Setting-the-staff-size
A couple of notes:
placing #(set-global-staff-size 15.87) somewhere in your file will
change the size of the staff and scale scale all the fonts (music and
text,
I just saw the warning about staff spaces at the bottom of the
documentation page. The question remains, is this behavior beneficial?
If so, should the documentation and command wording simply be reworked?
David
Chris wrote:
Hi! Is it possible to change the staff size?
I found in the
If they don't do the same thing then clearly change the documentation.
To the degree that they do something different, changing the name of
the command would be good as well. I also like the idea of independent
changes as well--- which if possible should be more clearly reflected
in the docs.
60 matches
Mail list logo
