Oops, somehow I managed to read only the top half of Lukas' post and
missed the interesting part :-(
Am Freitag, den 26.06.2020, 15:01 +0200 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
> Hi Urs, hi Moritz,
>
> > > thanks for the improvements to my code! (I tend to stop thinking
> > > about it as soon as it work
Am Freitag, den 26.06.2020, 15:01 +0200 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
> Hi Urs, hi Moritz,
>
> > > thanks for the improvements to my code! (I tend to stop thinking
> > > about it as soon as it works for my case, which always leaves
> > > lots of
> > > room for improvement.)
> > >
> > Seems to be
Hi Urs, hi Moritz,
thanks for the improvements to my code! (I tend to stop thinking
about it as soon as it works for my case, which always leaves lots of
room for improvement.)
Seems to be the opposite of my approach. I'm always starting to think
in terms of reusability and "packages" right
Hi Moritz,
Moritz Heffter – Fri, 26. June 2020 13:26
> Hi Urs, hi Lukas,
> That looks very good, Lukas. And thank for coming up with the idea of
> integrating arabic scale degree numbers in lilypond, Urs. I’ll join the lobby
> team if you want :).
Definitely!
> For the usage of the numbers I ju
Hi Urs, hi Lukas,
That looks very good, Lukas. And thank for coming up with the idea of
integrating arabic scale degree numbers in lilypond, Urs. I’ll join the lobby
team if you want :).
For the usage of the numbers I just have two remarks, that might be far from
what is currently discussed. B
Am Freitag, den 26.06.2020, 13:14 +0200 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
> Hi Urs,
>
> thanks for the improvements to my code! (I tend to stop thinking
> about it as soon as it works for my case, which always leaves
> lots
> of room for improvement.)
Seems to be the opposite of my
Hi Urs,
thanks for the improvements to my code! (I tend to stop thinking about
it as soon as it works for my case, which always leaves lots of room for
improvement.)
The only remedy I can see right now would be to deal with this in an
after-line-breaking stencil. From there we could iterate
Hi Lukas,
that's great, and I hope you'll stick with me when I try to work that
out into a generally usable (i.e. sufficiently flexible) solution to
lobby with the GMTH ;-)
Am Freitag, den 26.06.2020, 10:07 +0200 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
> Hi Urs,
>
> > Hey, that looks promising - I didn't kn
Hi Urs,
Hey, that looks promising - I didn't know that.
Now I'd only need a way to properly do the vertical alignment against
the baseline of the lowest markup:
\figures {
<6 4 \markup { \circle \number 5 }>
<3+ \markup { \circle \number 6 }>
}
This might be achieved using an inversed
Hi Jean,
Am Donnerstag, den 25.06.2020, 18:22 +0200 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
>
>
> > Hi all,
> > there's a method of harmonic analysis (»Bassstufen« in German)
> > thatworks by having numbers in a main layer plus option bass
> > figures ontop. There are at least two flavours or
Hi all,
there's a method of harmonic analysis (»Bassstufen« in German) that
works by having numbers in a main layer plus option bass figures on
top. There are at least two flavours or this analysis markup: the
original one from the 18th century with bare numbers for the bass
steps, and at least o
Hi all,
there's a method of harmonic analysis (»Bassstufen« in German) that
works by having numbers in a main layer plus option bass figures on
top. There are at least two flavours or this analysis markup: the
original one from the 18th century with bare numbers for the bass
steps, and at least on
12 matches
Mail list logo
