No, it was truncated, but in a hard to understand way - quite irregular. But we
now know that was an artefact of the narrowing issue, and has not occurred
again. Widening did not help.
Andrew
> On 16 Oct 2015, at 16:45, T. Michael Sommers wrote:
>
> When the buffer was
Quoting Andrew Bernard (andrew.bern...@gmail.com):
> No, it was truncated, but in a hard to understand way - quite irregular. But
> we
> now know that was an artefact of the narrowing issue, and has not occurred
> again. Widening did not help.
Terms are important here. There's a world of
Greetings All,
I’m aware that the emacs lilypond-mode needs attention, but I wonder if anybody
has seen this. When I enter a ‘>’ character to complete a chord, emacs goes
into narrow mode, which then has to be undone with C-x n w. It’s consistently
reproducible.
Also, using evince on Ubuntu
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Greetings All,
>
> I’m aware that the emacs lilypond-mode needs attention, but I wonder
> if anybody has seen this. When I enter a ‘>’ character to complete a
> chord, emacs goes into narrow mode, which then has to be undone with
> C-x n w. It’s
Quoting Andrew Bernard (andrew.bern...@gmail.com):
> Also, using evince on Ubuntu 15.04 with either Unity or the GNOME 3 Shell,
> after several successful point-and-click redirects, the file in emacs get
> messed up and the source file has to be reloaded.
"messed up" is a bit vague. Is it
On 10/15/2015 7:24 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I’m aware that the emacs lilypond-mode needs attention, but I wonder
if anybody has seen this. When I enter a ‘>’ character to complete a
chord, emacs goes into narrow mode, which then has to be undone with
C-x n w. It’s consistently reproducible.
Greetings All,
With the fi, or workaround, for the narrowing problem, in place, the issue I
reported regarding the emacs buffer being messed up (apologies for my lack of
technical precision there! The buffer was being truncated to almost half the
length in a way quite hard to figure out from
Greetings T.M.,
Commenting out these lines fixes the issue.
Thanks! Can some elisp expert have a look at addressing this? For now, I am
fine, but this must affect others I would think, unless there is something odd
about my emacs setup, which is very simple.
Should this be reported as a bug?
On 10/15/2015 10:28 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote:
With the fi, or workaround, for the narrowing problem, in place, the
issue I reported regarding the emacs buffer being messed up
(apologies for my lack of technical precision there! The buffer was
being truncated to almost half the length in a way
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:03 AM, T. Michael Sommers
wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 7:24 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
>>
>> I’m aware that the emacs lilypond-mode needs attention, but I wonder
>> if anybody has seen this. When I enter a ‘>’ character to complete a
>> chord, emacs
Steve Lacy writes:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:03 AM, T. Michael Sommers
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/15/2015 7:24 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I’m aware that the emacs lilypond-mode needs attention, but I wonder
>>> if anybody has seen this. When I enter a
11 matches
Mail list logo