2013/9/3 Peter Bjuhr :
> Thanks, exciting!
>
> I haven't, but maybe now is a good time to set this up!
Definitely :)
What operating system are you using? I can give you some help if you'd like.
> A question, also related to David's answer about the distinction between
> engineer-friendly and use
2013/9/3 Peter Bjuhr :
>
> On 09/03/2013 05:36 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> What operating system are you using? I can give you some help if you'd like.
>
> That would be nice, thanks. I'm using Ubuntu.
Excellent!
> Is this the starting point:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contrib
On 09/03/2013 05:36 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2013/9/3 Peter Bjuhr :
Thanks, exciting!
I haven't, but maybe now is a good time to set this up!
Definitely :)
What operating system are you using? I can give you some help if you'd like.
That would be nice, thanks. I'm using Ubuntu.
Is this the
Am 03.09.2013 17:36, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2013/9/3 Peter Bjuhr :
Thanks, exciting!
I haven't, but maybe now is a good time to set this up!
Definitely :)
What operating system are you using? I can give you some help if you'd like.
A question, also related to David's answer about the distin
Sort-of. I mean, all information on how to build lilypond and
contribute to it are there, but (especially as you're already using
linux), we can do it an easier way using my awesome lilypond scripts.
Do you have git installed? And how proficient are you with command-line?
An easier way sounds gr
2013/9/3 Peter Bjuhr :
>> Sort-of. I mean, all information on how to build lilypond and
>> contribute to it are there, but (especially as you're already using
>> linux), we can do it an easier way using my awesome lilypond scripts.
>> Do you have git installed? And how proficient are you with com
2013/9/3 Janek Warchoł :
> 2013/9/3 Peter Bjuhr :
>>> Sort-of. I mean, all information on how to build lilypond and
>>> contribute to it are there, but (especially as you're already using
>>> linux), we can do it an easier way using my awesome lilypond scripts.
>>> Do you have git installed? And
On 09/03/2013 06:36 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
ok. Let's see if the scripts i wrote are as awesome as i think :)
Please run the attached script. After it finishes, run
~/path-you-specify-in-previous-script/janek-scripts/lilypond/build-lily.sh--help
I can now confirm the awesomeness! Everythin
If someone is interesting I have now set up the old and the new build
version of LilyPond according to this guide:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contributor/concurrent-stable-and-development-versions
I have also added the new version in Frescobaldi.
Next I will look at the modifi
2013/9/4 Janek Warchoł :
> I recommend that you try these two branches:
> origin/dev/janek/experimental-fix-for-issue-2462
> origin/dev/janek/experimental-fix-for-issue-2658 (this fix was
> actually written by David Kastrup)
BTW, i've just made some small improvements to the build script, so
you c
On 09/04/2013 04:32 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
BTW, i've just made some small improvements to the build script, so
you can go to the janek-scripts/ directory and do a 'git pull' to get
them.
Done, thanks!
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
li
On 09/04/2013 06:06 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Hm. That's not enough information. What was the full command you ran
(with options)? Also, can you paste more output?
Janek
I have sent you the full output. I didn't do any options. Didn't last
time and didn't think of it this time. Is that the p
On 09/04/2013 04:19 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Wow! (i expected problems :P) All these hours spent on writing the
script finally paid off :-D
I recommend that you try these two branches:
origin/dev/janek/experimental-fix-for-issue-2462
origin/dev/janek/experimental-fix-for-issue-2658 (this fix
2013/9/4 Peter Bjuhr :
>
> On 09/04/2013 04:19 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> I recommend that you try these two branches:
>> origin/dev/janek/experimental-fix-for-issue-2462
>> origin/dev/janek/experimental-fix-for-issue-2658 (this fix was
>> actually written by David Kastrup)
>
> I went to the sourc
2013/9/3 Peter Bjuhr :
>
> On 09/03/2013 06:36 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> ok. Let's see if the scripts i wrote are as awesome as i think :)
>> Please run the attached script. After it finishes, run
>> ~/path-you-specify-in-previous-script/janek-scripts/lilypond/build-lily.sh--help
>
> I can now
2013/9/4 Peter Bjuhr :
> On 09/04/2013 06:06 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hm. That's not enough information. What was the full command you ran
>> (with options)? Also, can you paste more output?
>> Janek
>
> I have sent you the full output.
I see. Quite strange, this commit builds fine on
On 09/04/2013 05:45 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
No, this is the correct place. Have you pulled new commits to your
lilypond sources? I've pushed these two branches barely before
sending that email.
If you did pull and still don't have these branches, you probably just
have old git version which
2013/9/4 Peter Bjuhr :
> I did it now and run build-lily.sh again. But this time I got an error:
>
>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>
>> real0m30.033s
>> user1m30.064s
>> sys0m3.596s
>> Make failed.
>> Exiting.
Hm. That's not enough information. What was the full command you ran
(with opt
On 09/04/2013 06:24 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
I see. Quite strange, this commit builds fine on my machine. Please
try building from scratch (use my script with -s option), and let me
know if it fails again.
Now the build was successful! Thanks again!
Peter
_
2013/9/4 Peter Bjuhr :
>
> On 09/04/2013 06:24 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>>
>> I see. Quite strange, this commit builds fine on my machine. Please
>> try building from scratch (use my script with -s option), and let me
>> know if it fails again.
>
> Now the build was successful! Thanks again!
Goo
On 09/04/2013 07:07 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Good :)
It's a known problem that sometimes lilypond fails to rebuild and has
to be built from scratch. It's nevertheless surprising that this had
happened to you...
Let me know if you'll have any problems with building other branches.
And btw, si
On 09/04/2013 07:07 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Good :)
It's a known problem that sometimes lilypond fails to rebuild and has
to be built from scratch. It's nevertheless surprising that this had
happened to you...
Let me know if you'll have any problems with building other branches.
And btw, si
2013/9/4 Peter Bjuhr :
> Is this what I need to do next to get the remote branches?
If you just want to build these branches with my script you shouldn't
have to do anything.
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contributor/working-with-remote-branches
Oh my God! This looks awful, and
Janek Warchoł writes:
> 2013/9/4 Peter Bjuhr :
>> Is this what I need to do next to get the remote branches?
>
> If you just want to build these branches with my script you shouldn't
> have to do anything.
>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contributor/working-with-remote-branches
>
2013/9/4 David Kastrup :
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> 2013/9/4 Peter Bjuhr :
>>> Is this what I need to do next to get the remote branches?
>>
>> If you just want to build these branches with my script you shouldn't
>> have to do anything.
>>
>>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contrib
2013/9/4 Peter Bjuhr :
> If everything is set I'll do a test!
>
> Attached is an image creating with old version 2.16. This is of course
> regular feta font.
>
> And an image created with the new version (2.17). This should be with the
> modified feta then? It's hard to spot any difference, but I n
Ok! I'll try out IRC!
Peter
On 09/04/2013 09:02 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2013/9/4 Peter Bjuhr :
If everything is set I'll do a test!
Attached is an image creating with old version 2.16. This is of course
regular feta font.
And an image created with the new version (2.17). This should be with
That is interesting. Janek's modifications are slight but make
everything look a little tighter. I like it especially the different
flags.
Shane
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
> After a very helpful chat with Janek I have now another example. Now the
> difference should be mo
2013/9/4 Shane Brandes :
> That is interesting. Janek's modifications are slight but make
> everything look a little tighter. I like it especially the different
> flags.
Thank you! If you have access to a Linux box (could be Ubuntu in a
virtual machine) and you'd like to try building lilypond wit
Janek Warchoł writes:
> 2013/9/4 Shane Brandes :
>> That is interesting. Janek's modifications are slight but make
>> everything look a little tighter. I like it especially the different
>> flags.
>
> Thank you! If you have access to a Linux box (could be Ubuntu in a
> virtual machine) and you'd
2013/9/5 David Kastrup :
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> 2013/9/4 Shane Brandes :
>>> That is interesting. Janek's modifications are slight but make
>>> everything look a little tighter. I like it especially the different
>>> flags.
>>
>> Thank you! If you have access to a Linux box (could be Ubuntu
Re multiple master fonts,
this concept predated OpenType and is no longer current.
There are some uses for it in in-house font design - which to some
extent could include lilypond - but MM fonts are not really offered any
more, and nobody is developing along those lines.
It's more or less an o
David Kastrup schrieb:
>Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> 2013/9/4 Shane Brandes :
>>> That is interesting. Janek's modifications are slight but make
>>> everything look a little tighter. I like it especially the different
>>> flags.
>>
>> Thank you! If you have access to a Linux box (could be Ubu
Hi all,
>> It's not really pretty that a house style should require building a
>> particular version of LilyPond.
+1
> "Multiple master fonts contain two or more "masters" — that is,
> original font styles — and enable a user to interpolate between these
> masters along a continuous range of "ax
Hi all,
> It's more or less an obsolete technology, and could not be recommended for
> lilypond.
What *would* be great — and I would want to support — is what we started
discussing a little while ago (a discussion that did not, I believe, come to a
satisfactory conclusion): the ability for Lil
Please don't post fullquotes with comments above. People can be
expected to use their mail reader or other tools if they really need to
refer to all the original content for some reason.
Instead, just cite what you are referring to and put your comments
below. It makes for a lot of work for peo
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi all,
>
>> It's more or less an obsolete technology, and could not be
>> recommended for lilypond.
>
> What *would* be great — and I would want to support — is what we
> started discussing a little while ago (a discussion that did not, I
> believe, come to a satisfact
A clarification re Adobe Multiple Masters font technology. This predated
OpenType, and such fonts are no longer offered and are discontinued. I
omitted to mention that OpenType does not support the parameterization
concept of MM, and so OT is not an evolution of MM. This is generally
because MM
[wearing the FreeType maintainer hat]
>> There are some uses for it in in-house font design - which to some
>> extent could include lilypond - but MM fonts are not really offered
>> any more, and nobody is developing along those lines.
Basically, I don't see any technical difficulties in using M
> I omitted to mention that OpenType does not support the
> parameterization concept of MM, and so OT is not an evolution of MM.
This is not correct. Earlier versions of the OpenType specification
*did* support MM, but since Adobe stopped using them, those tables
were removed from the OT specs t
Hi,
2013/9/5 Kieren MacMillan :
> What *would* be great — and I would want to support — is what we started
> discussing a little while ago (a discussion that did not, I believe, come to
> a satisfactory conclusion): the ability for Lilypond to support multiple
> different fonts. That way, one c
Urs Liska writes:
> David Kastrup schrieb:
>
>>Janek Warchoł writes:
>>
>>> 2013/9/4 Shane Brandes :
That is interesting. Janek's modifications are slight but make
everything look a little tighter. I like it especially the different
flags.
>>>
>>> Thank you! If you have access t
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> [wearing the FreeType maintainer hat]
> Howver, my opinion is that we don't *need* Multiple Masters in
> general. What we really need is an option to select a stylistic
> variant which contains a set of finely tuned glyphs representing a
> certain style, and OpenType pr
On 09/05/2013 11:49 PM, David Rogers wrote:
There are (were?) situations where multiple-masters are useful. But music
isn't one of them IMO.
Lyrics are, I suppose, but only for character width.
But how many multiple master fonts are there in existence? And how many
free ones?
Alas, I found on
> Alas, I found one:
> http://www.fontfabrik.com/lucfuse.html
> "FUSE 11 has pornography as theme. My contribution to this issue is
> a MultipleMaster font. [...] Five characters are converted to small
> FREE PORNO MOVIES. New versions use antialiasing and gif
> compression."
Actually, this is
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> Alas, I found one:
>> http://www.fontfabrik.com/lucfuse.html
>> "FUSE 11 has pornography as theme. My contribution to this issue is
>> a MultipleMaster font. [...] Five characters are converted to small
>> FREE PORNO MOVIES. New versions use antialiasing and gif
>> co
On 09/06/2013 06:54 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Werner LEMBERG writes:
Alas, I found one:
http://www.fontfabrik.com/lucfuse.html
"FUSE 11 has pornography as theme. My contribution to this issue is
a MultipleMaster font. [...] Five characters are converted to small
FREE PORNO MOVIES. New versi
47 matches
Mail list logo
