Re: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

need Mats, thank you. And fortunately, the other responses are very helpful as well, for unrelated issues I'm having. So thank you to all. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup-to-be-IN-the-staff-tp22312800p22328780.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing

Re: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

2009/3/4 aliteralmind aliteralmind-lilyp...@yahoo.com: The mind boggles  %-|   For about three weeks now, I have been reading LY documentation, forum posts, snippets, and examples, yet I never came across this. There is SO much information to absorb. I'm feeling more and more like the

Re: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

Valentin Villenave wrote: I would have thought that the first place to look at would be the manual: Musical Notation - Repeats - Short repeats Can you think of anything more obvious? It would certainly not have been obvious to me that this has anything to do with repeats, if I didn't

Re: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

Hi Mats (et al), It would certainly not have been obvious to me that this has anything to do with repeats, if I didn't know that that's the syntax used in LilyPond. Certainly, it's related to repeating something, but I would be surprised if you could find it in any music notation handbook

Re: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

El 04.03.2009, a las 14:17, Kieren MacMillan escribió: Hi Mats (et al), It would certainly not have been obvious to me that this has anything to do with repeats, if I didn't know that that's the syntax used in LilyPond. Certainly, it's related to repeating something, but I would be

Re: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

. You gotta admit, it's a crazy amount of information for a newbie to sift through, even one that has some musical training. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup-to-be-IN-the-staff-tp22312800p22330800.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive

Re: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

El 04.03.2009, a las 15:13, aliteralmind escribió: You gotta admit, it's a crazy amount of information for a newbie to sift through, even one that has some musical training. It's a crazy amount of information to sift through, period. I have such a new found respect for computer music

Forcing markup to be IN the staff

\context Lyrics = secondaryLyrics \lyricsto vSecondary \secondaryWords \layout {} \midi {} } -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup-to-be-IN-the-staff-tp22312800p22312800

Re: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

You might try the solution I posted in this thread a while back: http://www.nabble.com/bracketed-silence-td18414197.html Jon aliteralmind wrote: I have repetitive notes: c8 c c c c c c c c c c c | This type of repetition is found throughout my piece. I'm trying to hide the

RE: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

=internode.on@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org] On Behalf Of aliteralmind Sent: Wednesday, 4 March 2009 03:52 To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Forcing markup to be IN the staff I have repetitive notes: c8 c c c c c c c c c c c

Re: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup- to-be-IN-the-staff-tp22312800p22312800.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http

Re: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

vSecondary \secondaryWords \layout {} \midi {} } -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup-to-be-IN-the-staff-tp22312800p22312800.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list

Re: Forcing markup to be IN the staff

avoidance routine without resorting to the whims of extra-offset? David -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forcing-markup-to-be-IN-the-staff-tp22312800p22324651.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com