t; a single file)?
>
> --------------
- --
>
>
View this message in context: Re: Fwd: [smufl-discuss] SMuFL
> development moves to the new W3C Music Notation Community Group
> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Fwd-smufl-di
the full app behind it (i.e., to create a score from any code we throw at
> it, as long as it can be represented as a single file)?
>
> ------------------
> View this message in context: Re: Fwd: [smufl-discuss] SMuFL development
> moves to the new W3C Music Notation Comm
file)?
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Fwd-smufl-discuss-SMuFL-development-moves-to-the-new-W3C-Music-Notation-Community-Group-tp179133p179139.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___
lil
onnected to LilyBin somehow? That way you could upload music from
> anywhere! Sounds like a cool service to me.
>
> - Abraham
>
> ----------
> View this message in context: Re: Fwd: [smufl-discuss] SMuFL development
> moves to the new W3C Music Notation Communi
message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Fwd-smufl-discuss-SMuFL-development-moves-to-the-new-W3C-Music-Notation-Community-Group-tp179133p179136.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lily
Hi,
a small side note on this: Of course, the W3C and Wikipedia are much
different levels in terms of web standards. But at least there is some
type of music representation available for websites which (in my naïve
thinking) should not be ignored completely when working on a new standard.
https:/
This has been around on a few channels, but I'd like to forward it to
this place too.
Development of MusicXML and SMuFL is moved from two commercial companies
to a W3C community group.
This is definitely a big step and will change a few things. However, I'm
not fully convinced it is a good thing
