Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems NR 1.6 Staff notation has
never been announced as ready for public review, although it seems to be in
good shape (thanks to Till) and has been reviewed by members of the GDP
team. So I'll do it now.
Could all of you will a few minutes to spare ple
Am Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:33:10 +0100
schrieb "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> and post any comments, corrections or criticism to this list. Thanks.
Very well done. I only skimmed the text, but understood a lot of things
I only imitated before. Certainly an important section.
The only thing
Hi Trevor,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:33:10AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems NR 1.6 Staff notation has
> never been announced as ready for public review, although it seems to be
> in good shape (thanks to Till) and has been reviewed by members of th
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Sebastian Menge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:33:10 +0100
> schrieb "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> and post any comments, corrections or criticism to this list. Thanks.
>
> Very well done. I only skimmed the text, but understood a
: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lilypond-User List"
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: GDP NR 1.6 Staff notation ready for public review
Hi Trevor,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:33:10AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Please correct me if I am wron
]>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lilypond-User List"
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: GDP NR 1.6 Staff notation ready for public review
Am Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:33:10 +0100
schrieb "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
a
James E. Bailey wrote Monday, October 13, 2008 2:57 PM
On 13.10.2008, at 12:33, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems NR 1.6 Staff notation has
never been announced as ready for public review, although it seems to be
in good shape (thanks to Till) and has been
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> James E. Bailey wrote Monday, October 13, 2008 2:57 PM
>> 3) 1.6.2.1 Everything before \startStaff & \stopStaff seems like stuff
>> from 5.3 (modifying properties). And it seems like the whole section is
>> there to in
Patrick McCarty wrote Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:15 PM
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
James E. Bailey wrote Monday, October 13, 2008 2:57 PM
3) 1.6.2.1 Everything before \startStaff & \stopStaff seems like stuff
from 5.3 (modifying properties)
his kind of music
with a free license?
till
-
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LilyPond-Hilfe auch auf deutsch im http://www.lilypondforum.de/index.php
LilyPond-Forum .
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/GDP-NR-1.6-Staff-notation-ready-for-public-review-tp19952444p20030893.html
Sent
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:15 PM
>
>> I thought we wanted to leave all of these examples here. Since they
>> cover all of the easy-to-tweak properties of StaffSymbol, I think it
>> would be bett
Till Rettig wrote Friday, October 17, 2008 11:39 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
(in response to)
1) 1.6 Why doesn't the headword show something really specific to staff
notation? ( ossia, cut-out score, tab/rhythm/drum staff?)
I agree it would be better if it did. Do you have any suggestions
for
Patrick McCarty wrote Friday, October 17, 2008 6:54 PM
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:15 PM
I thought we wanted to leave all of these examples here. Since they
cover all of the easy-to-tweak p
13 matches
Mail list logo
