Re: I'm not smart enough to figure out the math for this.

2016-04-04 Thread Paul Morris
> On Mar 9, 2016, at 6:27 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > \version "2.19.28" > > show = > #(define-music-function (mup item) (markup? symbol-list-or-music?) > (propertyTweak 'stencil > (lambda (grob) >(grob-interpret-markup grob mup)) > item)) > > \relative c' \new Staff {

Re: I'm not smart enough to figure out the math for this.

2016-03-09 Thread David Kastrup
Simon Albrecht writes: > On 08.03.2016 22:06, Michael Rivers wrote: >> Thanks for the solutions. I'm OK with an error message! > > Or you can insert > > #(ly:expect-warning "strange") > > in your source. Here is a warning-less version: \version "2.19.28" show =

Re: I'm not smart enough to figure out the math for this.

2016-03-08 Thread Blöchl Bernhard
Do not understand the signification to break the rules as you immediately get an error response of lilypond. But for education purposes ... I hope Michael Rivers and the list will accept my apology. Am 08.03.2016 21:41, schrieb Simon Albrecht: On 08.03.2016 21:19, Blöchl Bernhard wrote:

Re: I'm not smart enough to figure out the math for this.

2016-03-08 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 08.03.2016 22:06, Michael Rivers wrote: Thanks for the solutions. I'm OK with an error message! Or you can insert #(ly:expect-warning "strange") in your source. Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: I'm not smart enough to figure out the math for this.

2016-03-08 Thread Michael Rivers
Thanks for the solutions. I'm OK with an error message! -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/I-m-not-smart-enough-to-figure-out-the-math-for-this-tp188290p188297.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: I'm not smart enough to figure out the math for this.

2016-03-08 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 08.03.2016 21:19, Blöchl Bernhard wrote: May be you need some private coaching in waltz math ? Here it is: \relative c' { \time 3/4 c4 c c | c c c } Bernhard, what the heck do you think you’re up to? Please _read_ others’ posts before sneering at them, or better just quit

Re: I'm not smart enough to figure out the math for this.

2016-03-08 Thread Blöchl Bernhard
May be you need some private coaching in waltz math ? Here iot is: \relative c' { \time 3/4 c4 c c | c c c } Am 08.03.2016 21:00, schrieb Michael Rivers: I'm trying to make a snippet for students with intentional mistakes for them to correct. I want the time signature to say

Re: I'm not smart enough to figure out the math for this.

2016-03-08 Thread David Kastrup
Michael Rivers writes: > I'm trying to make a snippet for students with intentional mistakes for them > to correct. I want the time signature to say 4/3, but for the music to > actually be in 3/4. Should I use "scaleDurations", and what should the ratio > be? Or is

Re: I'm not smart enough to figure out the math for this.

2016-03-08 Thread Mike Solomon
> On 08 Mar 2016, at 22:00, Michael Rivers wrote: > > I'm trying to make a snippet for students with intentional mistakes for them > to correct. I want the time signature to say 4/3, but for the music to > actually be in 3/4. Should I use "scaleDurations", and what

Re: I'm not smart enough to figure out the math for this.

2016-03-08 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Michael, > I want the time signature to say 4/3, but for the music to actually be in 3/4. In this case, you can simply override the fraction and ignore the error: \version "2.19.24" \relative c' { \time 3/4 \set Staff.timeSignatureFraction = 4/3 c4 c c | c c c } Hope that helps!

I'm not smart enough to figure out the math for this.

2016-03-08 Thread Michael Rivers
I'm trying to make a snippet for students with intentional mistakes for them to correct. I want the time signature to say 4/3, but for the music to actually be in 3/4. Should I use "scaleDurations", and what should the ratio be? Or is there a better way to do this? \version "2.19.24" \relative