Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Am 06.03.2014 18:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
[...]
So I'm now down to
and that's probably long enough I should spend on this distraction.
What about
{ r8 a' d e f\3 a\2 | f\3 a\2 d\12\arpeggio } \\
{
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Am 06.03.2014 18:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
[...]
So I'm now down to
and that's probably long enough I should spend on this distraction.
What about
{ r8 a' d e f\3 a\2 |
Am 08.03.2014 09:32, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Am 06.03.2014 18:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
[...]
So I'm now down to
and that's probably long enough I should spend on this
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Am 08.03.2014 09:32, schrieb David Kastrup:
Not that hard. Except that with
{ \set tieWaitForNote = ##t
r8 a' d e f\3~ a\2~ | f a d2 } \\
{ d,2.~ | d2 }
r4
the string indication on the first f is not really a mere matter
Am 08.03.2014 10:42, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Am 08.03.2014 09:32, schrieb David Kastrup:
Not that hard. Except that with
{ \set tieWaitForNote = ##t
r8 a' d e f\3~ a\2~ | f a d2 } \\
{ d,2.~ | d2 }
r4
the string
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Am 08.03.2014 10:42, schrieb David Kastrup:
Sure, but puzzle games and backtracking are not sightreader-friendly.
I am accustomed to work through a guitar piece where some
spurious fingerings give you a faint idea where the notes are supposed
to be located
2014-03-05 20:49 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
I am not top-posting
I want to avoid ossia staves. They seem reasonably self-evident as
alternatives for the potentially less playable runs (probably the end is
the clincher). But how bad are those, anyway? The Midi sounds doable.
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2014-03-05 20:49 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
I am not top-posting
I want to avoid ossia staves. They seem reasonably self-evident as
alternatives for the potentially less playable runs (probably the end is
the clincher). But how
Hi Kevin,
Am 07.03.2014 08:40, schrieb Kevin Tough:
What application/software is used on linux to play the generated midi
file. I have tried Movie Player, Tux Guitar, KGuitar and they all are
missing components or crash.
you might need to install a soundfont. For example fluid-soundfont-gm.
Am 06.03.2014 18:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
[...]
So I'm now down to
and that's probably long enough I should spend on this distraction.
What about
{ r8 a' d e f\3 a\2 | f\3 a\2 d\12\arpeggio } \\
{ d,2.~ | d2 } r4
for the final
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de writes:
sounds good. perfectly doable. no problems. I like the dorian runs
but I’d rather start the repetition sign after the partial...
Sure, but I'd have to reorganize the lyrics. Either that or use
different repeat bars for
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
But how bad are those, anyway? The Midi sounds doable.
And I am too lazy to look for my guitar and skills.
From a guitarist perspective, looks playable to me.
From a LilyPond perspective, I always consider David's snippets as
useful learning stuff. While
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de writes:
sounds good. perfectly doable. no problems. I like the dorian runs
but I’d rather start the repetition sign after the partial...
Sure, but I'd have to reorganize the lyrics. Either
Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
But how bad are those, anyway? The Midi sounds doable.
And I am too lazy to look for my guitar and skills.
From a guitarist perspective, looks playable to me.
From a LilyPond perspective, I always consider
On 06.03.2014, at 09:58, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de writes:
sounds good. perfectly doable. no problems. I like the dorian runs
but I’d rather start the repetition sign after the
The runs are playable, but in each run I would either play the final B on the
open B string or omit the C in the following F chord.
John Link
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Am 06.03.2014 09:58, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
[...]
Ok, here we go. I also decided to beam over the whole second run in
order to avoid suggesting a strongly grouped interpretation.
Just one question: why do you use Green- sleeves
instead of Green -- sleeves
John Link johnl...@nyc.rr.com writes:
The runs are playable, but in each run I would either play the final B
on the open B string or omit the C in the following F chord.
Well, the C is the target of the run so it's not really an option to
omit it. With regard to playing on the open string,
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Am 06.03.2014 09:58, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
[...]
Ok, here we go. I also decided to beam over the whole second run in
order to avoid suggesting a strongly grouped interpretation.
Just one question: why do you use Green-
On Mar 6, 2014, at 9:53 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
John Link johnl...@nyc.rr.com writes:
The runs are playable, but in each run I would either play the final B
on the open B string or omit the C in the following F chord.
Well, the C is the target of the run so it's not really an option to
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Just one question: why do you use Green- sleeves
instead of Green -- sleeves in the lyrics?
You would not expect me to read the manual, would you? Will fix in the
next iteration.
Actually, I assumed you did that on purpose, to create an authentic
vintage
John Link johnl...@nyc.rr.com writes:
On Mar 6, 2014, at 9:53 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
John Link johnl...@nyc.rr.com writes:
The runs are playable, but in each run I would either play the final B
on the open B string or omit the C in the following F chord.
Well, the C is the target of
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Hm. I'm not convinced so I'll give my guitar a bit of a workout and
try extrapolating to a somewhat better player from there. Of course,
I can't enforce any particular execution anyway so I'm probably
overthinking this, but I still like not to be absurd.
What application/software is used on linux to play the generated midi
file. I have tried Movie Player, Tux Guitar, KGuitar and they all are
missing components or crash.
Namaste,
Kevin Tough
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 18:00 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Hm. I'm
Kevin Tough ke...@toughlife.org writes:
What application/software is used on linux to play the generated midi
file. I have tried Movie Player, Tux Guitar, KGuitar and they all are
missing components or crash.
Unless you have a Midi expander or other Midi playing device, all
Linux-based
I am not top-posting
I want to avoid ossia staves. They seem reasonably self-evident as
alternatives for the potentially less playable runs (probably the end is
the clincher). But how bad are those, anyway? The Midi sounds doable.
And I am too lazy to look for my guitar and skills.
\version
Am 05.03.2014 20:49, schrieb David Kastrup:
I am not top-posting
I want to avoid ossia staves. They seem reasonably self-evident as
alternatives for the potentially less playable runs (probably the end is
the clincher). But how bad are those, anyway? The Midi sounds doable.
And I am too
On 05.03.2014, at 20:49, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I am not top-posting
I want to avoid ossia staves. They seem reasonably self-evident as
alternatives for the potentially less playable runs (probably the end is
the clincher). But how bad are those, anyway? The Midi sounds
Am 05.03.2014 21:14, schrieb Marc Hohl:
Am 05.03.2014 20:49, schrieb David Kastrup:
I am not top-posting
I want to avoid ossia staves. They seem reasonably self-evident as
alternatives for the potentially less playable runs (probably the end is
the clincher). But how bad are those,
Am 05.03.2014 20:49, schrieb David Kastrup:
I am not top-posting
I want to avoid ossia staves. They seem reasonably self-evident as
alternatives for the potentially less playable runs (probably the end is
the clincher). But how bad are those, anyway? The Midi sounds doable.
And I am too
pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de writes:
On 05.03.2014, at 20:49, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I am not top-posting
I want to avoid ossia staves. They seem reasonably self-evident as
alternatives for the potentially less playable runs (probably the end is
the clincher). But how bad are
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Am 05.03.2014 20:49, schrieb David Kastrup:
I am not top-posting
I want to avoid ossia staves. They seem reasonably self-evident as
alternatives for the potentially less playable runs (probably the end is
the clincher). But how bad are those, anyway?
Am 05.03.2014 21:45, schrieb David Kastrup:
[...]
So the absence of more definite instructions is intentional to let the
player make the best of it.
Ah, ok, makes perfect sense to me.
Marc
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
33 matches
Mail list logo
