Wednesday, 8 April 2009 15:43
> To: Nick Payne; lilypond-user@gnu.org; Kieren MacMillan
> Subject: Re: Left/right noteheads in chord containing second
>
> Nick,
>
> Here's a rather awkward solution. How often would you need this? And
> just out of curiosity, why?
> I
There have been a number of requests over the years for this kind of
feature. Primarily to get more understandable layout in cases where
there are accidentals on some of the notes and you want the accidental
to be close to the corresponding note head, if I remember correctly.
Search the mailing
Nick,
this is a little less awkward, but you still have
to adjust the 'length and 'extra-offset properties
of Stem in some cases. But now you don't have to
guess the X-offsets. The macro calculates the
appropriate X-offsets based on the note-values.
There are still some quirks though. It fails
Nick,
Here's a rather awkward solution. How often would
you need this? And just out of curiosity, why?
I guess I would use something like this if I were
making a "circle the correct notation" exercise in
a textbook or something. Anyway, the solution I
have here would be a pain if you needed to d
Hi Nick,
Is it possible, in a chord containing a second, to specify which
note in the
second should appear to the left of the stem and which to the
right? The
order of the notes doesn't change anything - ie and gis,>
both have D to the left and E to the right.
My guess is, use the \tweak
Is it possible, in a chord containing a second, to specify which note in the
second should appear to the left of the stem and which to the right? The
order of the notes doesn't change anything - ie and
both have D to the left and E to the right.
Nick
__
