Hi All,
It transpires that I have been using FL Studio 20, and I am a new user
of that amazing DAW. FL Studio is immensely sophisticated and the
technique is that you import the MIDI CC and automation data to the
channel in question (e.g. 64) with the event editor, a separate
operation. That's why
Le 20/10/2020 à 16:32, Andrew Bernard a écrit :
Hi Jean,
This is totally great. I never heard of this tool. How would a user
know it exists - as far as I can see there is nothing in the NR (I may
be wrong)? It never occurred to me as a user to look at the programs
in the usr/bin areas as I tho
Hi Jean,
This is totally great. I never heard of this tool. How would a user
know it exists - as far as I can see there is nothing in the NR (I may
be wrong)? It never occurred to me as a user to look at the programs
in the usr/bin areas as I thought everything was installed in
$HOME/bin.
Andrew
On 18/10/2020 07:33, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I think it is the case that LilyPond can't output sustain pedal
information in MIDI files. So, how do people work with this? For
piano, or vibraphone, for example.
Andrew
Some inconsistencies in the implementations of Piano_pedal_performer and
Piano_p
Le 18/10/2020 à 10:17, Aaron Hill a écrit :
On 2020-10-17 11:33 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I think it is the case that LilyPond can't output sustain pedal
information in MIDI files. So, how do people work with this? For
piano, or vibraphone, for example.
Which version are you using? The Pian
I think it is the case that LilyPond can't output sustain pedal
information in MIDI files. So, how do people work with this? For
piano, or vibraphone, for example.
Andrew
Hi Vaughan
Unfortunately the error is the same when I compile with this change.
Best regards
Herbert
2017-03-10 4:04 GMT+01:00 Vaughan McAlley :
> On 10 March 2017 at 02:00, Herbert Liechti
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2017-02-24 13:49 GMT+01:00 Vaughan McAlley :
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> I’m ple
On 10 March 2017 at 02:00, Herbert Liechti wrote:
>
>
> 2017-02-24 13:49 GMT+01:00 Vaughan McAlley :
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I’m pleased to announce LilyQuick,
>
>
> Hello
>
> I tried to compile LilyQuick on a Ubuntu
>
> Distributor ID: Ubuntu
> Description: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS
> Release: 16.04
> Co
2017-02-24 13:49 GMT+01:00 Vaughan McAlley :
> Greetings,
>
> I’m pleased to announce LilyQuick,
Hello
I tried to compile LilyQuick on a Ubuntu
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS
Release: 16.04
Codename: xenial
When I run make I get the following error:
gcc -ILuaSource -
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:48:59 +1100, Vaughan McAlley
wrote:
> Sorry missed that one. The alsa_seq driver is the one that works,
> couldn't tell you why :)
Indeed, now it all works (except that qsynth is not terminated when lq
exits).
The driver setting is very problematic since I use qsynth often
On 5 March 2017 at 03:27, Johan Vromans wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 16:58:14 +1100, Vaughan McAlley
> wrote:
>
>> I installed Fedora on to a spare partition and LilyQuick worked! A bit
>> annoying :-) I thought it might have to do with SELinux permissions,
>> but it appears not.
>>
>> Could you t
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 16:58:14 +1100, Vaughan McAlley
wrote:
> I installed Fedora on to a spare partition and LilyQuick worked! A bit
> annoying :-) I thought it might have to do with SELinux permissions,
> but it appears not.
>
> Could you try typing
>
> sudo cat /dev/input/by-id/usb-Apple__Inc_A
On 25 February 2017 at 20:45, Johan Vromans wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:33:11 +1100, Vaughan McAlley
> wrote:
>
>> Maybe your keyboard is interpreting F8 as something else rather than
>> the function key proper.
>
> It seems that lq isn't intercepting keystrokes at all. After uncommenting
> l
On 25 February 2017 at 20:45, Johan Vromans wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:33:11 +1100, Vaughan McAlley
> wrote:
>
> > Maybe your keyboard is interpreting F8 as something else rather than
> > the function key proper.
>
> It seems that lq isn't intercepting keystrokes at all. After uncommenting
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:33:11 +1100, Vaughan McAlley
wrote:
> Maybe your keyboard is interpreting F8 as something else rather than
> the function key proper.
It seems that lq isn't intercepting keystrokes at all. After uncommenting
line 341 nothing is printed:
$ sudo ./lq
Password:
Welcome to Li
On 25 February 2017 at 06:30, Johan Vromans wrote:
> It compiles and build flawlessly on Fedora 25, both with system lua and the
> supplied lua.
>
That's nice to know.
> After adjusting the LQconfig.lua it runs, starts qsynth and I can play and
> hear notes from the MIDI keyboard. However, lq do
On 25 Feb 2017 12:30 a.m., "Urs Liska" wrote:
Hi Vaughan,
Am 24.02.2017 um 13:49 schrieb Vaughan McAlley:
> Greetings,
>
> I’m pleased to announce LilyQuick, a greatly improved descendant of
> Finale’s Speedy Note Entry. The basic idea is to play notes on the
> MIDI keyboard with your left hand
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 23:49:19 +1100, Vaughan McAlley
wrote:
> I’m pleased to announce LilyQuick, a greatly improved descendant of
> Finale’s Speedy Note Entry.
Sounds very interesting...
It compiles and build flawlessly on Fedora 25, both with system lua and the
supplied lua.
After adjusting t
on this and
sharing it with us! I will try it out and report how things go.
Ben
-
composer | sound designer | asmr artist
LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ANN-LilyQuick-0-9beta-fa
Hi Vaughan,
Am 24.02.2017 um 13:49 schrieb Vaughan McAlley:
> Greetings,
>
> I’m pleased to announce LilyQuick, a greatly improved descendant of
> Finale’s Speedy Note Entry. The basic idea is to play notes on the
> MIDI keyboard with your left hand, and use the numeric keypad to enter
> the rhyt
Greetings,
I’m pleased to announce LilyQuick, a greatly improved descendant of
Finale’s Speedy Note Entry. The basic idea is to play notes on the
MIDI keyboard with your left hand, and use the numeric keypad to enter
the rhythms with your right hand. LilyQuick types the notes for you.
Being able t
Il giorno dom 4 dic 2016 alle 9:53, Urs Liska ha
scritto:
I'm running LMDE2 (Linux Mint Debian Edition), and requesting the
Debian
Version returns 8.4. Interestingly there's exactly one other person
having expressed this problem and he also was running Debian 8.4.
So I'm pretty sure the proble
to do this manually because it's such a huge beast with
presumably countless dependencies.
So if anyone can give me a hint on how to force an upgrade or to add a
current installation *beside* the package one I'd be very glad.
Best
Urs
>
>
>
> -
> composer | sou
oth recently so I hope it
continues with the new version!
What distro are you using Urs? Just curious. What issues have you seen on
your end w/ Qt5?
-
composer | sound designer
LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond
--
View this message in context:
http://l
Am 01.12.2016 um 17:59 schrieb David Kastrup:
> SoundsFromSound writes:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I just wanted to let you guys know that not long ago I uploaded some
>> tutorials showing how to setup a MIDI keyboard for MIDI input of your scores
>> (using Frescobaldi), as well as how to listen
SoundsFromSound writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I just wanted to let you guys know that not long ago I uploaded some
> tutorials showing how to setup a MIDI keyboard for MIDI input of your scores
> (using Frescobaldi), as well as how to listen to your score playback, and
> also how to export MIDI.
hours of content)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHi8BvxILUV6x9FqEmZiYrEj6VMGmTKjt
Hope you all have a good day,
Ben
-
composer | sound designer
LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.c
Hi All,
When I output to MIDI, it seems that notes on my DrumStaff do not go to
channel ten--in the MIDI file, they are assigned a basic GM piano sound. Is
there a way to explicitly assign MIDI channel 10 to DrumStaff?
Thanks,
Dave
___
lilypond-user ma
Simon Bailey wrote Sunday, April 12, 2009 1:12 PM
On 12 Apr 2009, at 13:42, Trevor Daniels wrote:
LGTM. Pushed to git origin/master,
lgtm?
Looks good to me. A Han-Wen-ism.
Trevor
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://li
hi,
On 12 Apr 2009, at 13:42, Trevor Daniels wrote:
LGTM. Pushed to git origin/master,
lgtm?
Editing docs is fun, isn't it ;)
yeah. ;) something i don't get to do too much of in my own projects --
too much coding, not enough time for docs. :/
regards,
sb
__
Thanks Simon
LGTM. Pushed to git origin/master,
Editing docs is fun, isn't it ;)
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Bailey"
To: "Neil Puttock"
Cc: "Trevor Daniels" ; "lilypond-user
Mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009
On 11 Apr 2009, at 15:22, Neil Puttock wrote:
insert the following line before the start of the @code{\score} block:
Simon, this line isn't quite right, since users might place the option
setting inside a \book or \bookpart block, resulting in a syntax
error. It would be better to advise pla
2009/4/9 Simon Bailey :
> here's the new patch-set. i'm sorry, but i can't work out how to get git to
> give me one single patch for the three commits i made locally since checking
> out.
insert the following line before the start of the @code{\score} block:
Simon, this line isn't quite right,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 08:16:32AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> On the other hand, if I'm doing programming work and commit changes then
> find that I have a typo in my commit, it's much cleaner to rebase so that
> there is only one patch.
Don't forget that if you want to correct a mistake in
On 4/9/09 8:09 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:37:39PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
>> carl,
>>
>> On 9 Apr 2009, at 15:27, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>> The way to get a single patch from multiple commits is to use git
>>> rebase.
>>>
>>> git rebase -i origin/master
>>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:37:39PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
> carl,
>
> On 9 Apr 2009, at 15:27, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> The way to get a single patch from multiple commits is to use git
>> rebase.
>>
>> git rebase -i origin/master
>>
>> will give you the opportunity to convert your 3 commit
carl,
On 9 Apr 2009, at 15:27, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
The way to get a single patch from multiple commits is to use git
rebase.
git rebase -i origin/master
will give you the opportunity to convert your 3 commits into a single
commit, which will then make a single patch.
that's perfect. t
On 4/9/09 4:23 AM, "Simon Bailey" wrote:
>
> here's the new patch-set. i'm sorry, but i can't work out how to get
> git to give me one single patch for the three commits i made locally
> since checking out.
Simon,
The way to get a single patch from multiple commits is to use git rebase.
g
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 01:01:56PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
> no problems. always glad to help. although i will have to find a decent
> git tutorial at some point. ;)
I can recommend http://gitready.com/ Maybe it's not for complete
beginners, but it has a pretty good range of accessibility. It'
On 9 Apr 2009, at 13:37, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Although I've learned enough Git to do patches, this book is still
on my wishlist:
http://www.pragprog.com/titles/tsgit/pragmatic-version-control-using-git
It's gotten good reviews.
thankyou, jon. i'll pass this link onto my boss, seeing as so
Simon Bailey wrote:
On 9 Apr 2009, at 12:51, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Thanks Simon, pushed to git origin/master.
no problems. always glad to help. although i will have to find a decent
git tutorial at some point. ;)
Although I've learned enough Git to do patches, this book is still on my
On 9 Apr 2009, at 12:51, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Thanks Simon, pushed to git origin/master.
no problems. always glad to help. although i will have to find a
decent git tutorial at some point. ;)
regards,
sb
--
Simon Bailey
Oompa Loompa of Science
+43 699 190 631 25
_
Thanks Simon, pushed to git origin/master.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Bailey"
To: "Trevor Daniels"
Cc: "lilypond-user Mailinglist"
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: LilyPond midi extension
trevor,
On 9 Apr 2009,
trevor,
On 9 Apr 2009, at 09:41, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Thanks for this, but the text is not quite right. IIRC the default
is .mid for Windows systems and .midi for all others. Could you
please amend and resubmit to reflect this?
It's also worth mentioning the equivalent command line option
;
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc: "lilypond-user Mailinglist"
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond midi extension
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:39:14PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
#(ly:set-option 'midi-extension "midi")
i couldn't find
ly
these options can be found with
lilypond -dhelp
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/LilyPond-midi-extension-tp22947624p22959776.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-u
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:39:14PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
>
> On 8 Apr 2009, at 12:32, Thomas Scharkowski wrote:
>> some time ago the default midi extension for windows was changed to
>> "mid".
>> How can change it back to "midi"?
> #(ly:set-option 'midi-extension "midi")
I'm sure the reason
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:39:14PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
#(ly:set-option 'midi-extension "midi")
i couldn't find this in the documentation -- shouldn't it be in there
somewhere?
Patches accepted.
patch against this afternoon's git attached. also included a patch for
the german trans
On 8 Apr 2009, at 14:49, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:39:14PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
#(ly:set-option 'midi-extension "midi")
i couldn't find this in the documentation -- shouldn't it be in there
somewhere?
Patches accepted.
ok. i'll get one to you this evening.
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:39:14PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
>
> #(ly:set-option 'midi-extension "midi")
>
> i couldn't find this in the documentation -- shouldn't it be in there
> somewhere?
Patches accepted.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mai
On 8 Apr 2009, at 12:32, Thomas Scharkowski wrote:
some time ago the default midi extension for windows was changed to
"mid".
How can change it back to "midi"?
put
#(ly:set-option 'midi-extension "midi")
somewhere in your source files (probably right at the beginning makes
sense).
i cou
Hi,
some time ago the default midi extension for windows was changed to
"mid".
How can change it back to "midi"?
thanks,
Thomas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
t; > written in Python.
> >
> > I'm looking for a way to play the results as they are produced (i.e bar
> > by bar), and it occurred to me that simply playing Lilypond midi files
> > with a midi player would do the trick.
> >
> > However, I can't
I'm glad you asked! The program is intended to have a performance
mode: you
enter a set of requirements and restrictions on the command-line
(this is the
creative part!) and then see what it produces.
The program then does some combinatorial number-crunching, which
can take a
long time to c
to print the results of an algorithmic music program
written in Python.
I'm looking for a way to play the results as they are produced (i.e bar
by bar), and it occurred to me that simply playing Lilypond midi files
with a midi player would do the trick.
However, I can't figure out how to
rred to me that simply playing Lilypond midi files with a midi
player would do the trick.
However, I can't figure out how to get Lilypond's midi data sent to stdout,
where it could then be read from stdin by a player. Whatever I try (including
python pipes and even plain shell pipes) it j
Hi,
I'm using Lilypond to print the results of an algorithmic music program written
in Python.
I'm looking for a way to play the results as they are produced (i.e bar by
bar), and it occurred to me that simply playing Lilypond midi files with a midi
player would do the trick.
Bob Harris escreveu:
> Pondering The lilypond doc (for 2.8.8) suggests that there are
> certain extensions a user can make by including some scheme code in
> her .ly file (at least that's my understanding of what I read). Is
> control of midi note velocity something I could accomplish that way
I wrote:
I was hoping to combine lilypond with this on the command
line like this:
cat mysong.ly | lilypond - | velchanger | mysong.midi
Anybody have any ideas how I can accomplish that in a single
command? My cycle is
edit,convert-to-midi,listen-in-garage-band, and I'm trying
to get it down
Bob Harris wrote:
I was hoping to combine lilypond with this on the command
line like this:
cat mysong.ly | lilypond - | velchanger | mysong.midi
Anybody have any ideas how I can accomplish that in a single
command? My cycle is
edit,convert-to-midi,listen-in-garage-band, and I'm trying
to ge
Howdy,
I'm wondering if there is a way to have command-line
lilypond produce midi on stdout.
My typical use is to feed a .ly file into lilypond to create
a .midi output, then take thatinto garage band (a mac
program which I would describe as a midi recorder and track
editor). Unfortunately lilyp
Aaron Morse wrote:
> On 8/17/05, John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please always tell which platform and which LilyPond version you
> use!
> Sorry, I completely forgot. I believe I have LilyPond 2.6.3 for
> Windows on a system running Windows XP Home (Dell Dimension 2400, 256
> MB RAM
Aaron Morse wrote:
> Perhaps this is explained clearly elsewhere, but I have a question. I
> have the following file compiling a score of a composition I just
> wrote:
>
> \include "horn.ly"
> \include "trumpet.ly"
> \include "drums.ly"
> \include "bass-tbone.ly"
> \header {
> title = "Ea"
>
Perhaps this is explained clearly elsewhere, but I have a question. I
have the following file compiling a score of a composition I just
wrote:
\include "horn.ly"
\include "trumpet.ly"
\include "drums.ly"
\include "bass-tbone.ly"
\header {
title = "Ea"
instrument = "Trumpet in C, Ho
64 matches
Mail list logo
