Op Sun, 10 May 2015 10:07:59 +0200
Urs Liska schreef:
> I know I could collect this information myself, but I prefer having
> it 1st-hand and current this way.
>
> I will be presenting LilyPond to the MEI community at the Music
> Encoding Conference in Florence in a week. As one (small) part of
I'm not involved in the development end of this, but I know there's an
Emacs major mode, lilypond-mode, for entering Lilypond files. I've used
it only a little bit. I don't believe it is very actively developed, but
I could be wrong.
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-edito
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 07:42 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:02:12AM +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 10:07 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> > [...]
> > >
> > > So I'd be happy if anyone who is involved in the development of a
> > > LilyPond editing environment
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:02:12AM +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 10:07 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > So I'd be happy if anyone who is involved in the development of a
> > LilyPond editing environment could send me (privately or on this list) a
> > very short repor
Am 10.05.2015 um 12:02 schrieb Richard Shann:
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 10:07 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
[...]
So I'd be happy if anyone who is involved in the development of a
LilyPond editing environment could send me (privately or on this list) a
very short report about it, with
- name
- tooltip-li
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 10:07 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
[...]
>
> So I'd be happy if anyone who is involved in the development of a
> LilyPond editing environment could send me (privately or on this list) a
> very short report about it, with
> - name
> - tooltip-like short description about the fund
I know I could collect this information myself, but I prefer having it
1st-hand and current this way.
I will be presenting LilyPond to the MEI community at the Music Encoding
Conference in Florence in a week. As one (small) part of the
presentation I want to present a list of interesting editi
Am 09.12.2013 18:19, schrieb Carl Peterson:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Carl Peterson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
Would a section "Online Tools" better be placed between the
"full-fledged" editors (Frescobaldi/Denemo) and "Text editors" or after the
"Text ed
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Carl Peterson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>>
>> Would a section "Online Tools" better be placed between the
>> "full-fledged" editors (Frescobaldi/Denemo) and "Text editors" or after the
>> "Text editors".
>>
>> I think we could co
2013/12/9 Urs Liska :
> Would a section "Online Tools" better be placed between the "full-fledged"
> editors (Frescobaldi/Denemo) and "Text editors" or after the "Text editors".
before "text editors" imo
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
>
> Would a section "Online Tools" better be placed between the "full-fledged"
> editors (Frescobaldi/Denemo) and "Text editors" or after the "Text editors".
>
> I think we could consider not only score editors but also tools like
> - http://scale
Am 09.12.2013 17:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2013/12/9 Federico Bruni :
2013/12/9 Janek Warchoł
Hard to say. And I think there was some licensing problem with
Lilybin (it may not be fully free, and as GNU we cannot recommend
non-free programs).
I see MIT license here:
https://github.com/trev
2013/12/9 Federico Bruni :
> 2013/12/9 Janek Warchoł
>>
>> Hard to say. And I think there was some licensing problem with
>> Lilybin (it may not be fully free, and as GNU we cannot recommend
>> non-free programs).
>
>
> I see MIT license here:
> https://github.com/trevordixon/LilyBin/blob/master/
2013/12/9 Janek Warchoł
> Hard to say. And I think there was some licensing problem with
> Lilybin (it may not be fully free, and as GNU we cannot recommend
> non-free programs).
>
I see MIT license here:
https://github.com/trevordixon/LilyBin/blob/master/LICENSE
___
2013/12/9 Urs Liska :
> Hi,
>
> I have a few questions about the contents of the "Easier editing" page on
> lilypond.org.
>
> a)
> LilyPondTool.
> The link is broken, and http://lilypondtool.blogspot.de/ states (as of
> 2012-09-14) that development of LilyPondTool is stopped.
> Should I move it to
Hi,
I have a few questions about the contents of the "Easier editing" page
on lilypond.org.
a)
LilyPondTool.
The link is broken, and http://lilypondtool.blogspot.de/ states (as of
2012-09-14) that development of LilyPondTool is stopped.
Should I move it to the " Other programs not being activ
On 06/09/12 16:27, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Nick Payne
> wrote:
>> Elysium (the Eclipse plugin for Lilypond editing) is not listed in the
>> documentation as one of the editing environments for Lilypond. It should
>> probably be there
>> http://elysium.thsoft.hu/
> I
012/9/6 Janek Warchoł :
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Nick Payne
> wrote:
>> Elysium (the Eclipse plugin for Lilypond editing) is not listed in the
>> documentation as one of the editing environments for Lilypond. It should
>> probably be there
>> http://elysium.thsoft.hu/
>
> I didn't found
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Nick Payne wrote:
> Elysium (the Eclipse plugin for Lilypond editing) is not listed in the
> documentation as one of the editing environments for Lilypond. It should
> probably be there
> http://elysium.thsoft.hu/
I didn't found licensing information on their websi
Elysium (the Eclipse plugin for Lilypond editing) is not listed in the
documentation as one of the editing environments for Lilypond. It should
probably be there (
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/web-big-page#easier-editing).
http://elysium.thsoft.hu/
Nick
Op vrijdag 30 oktober 2009 schreef Ian:
> I've noticed that LilypondTool and Frescobaldi can get fooled using
> their internal pdf viewers about where the successfully compiled output is.
>
> I wonder if you editor guys can take an enhancement to make your PDF
> viewers sensitive to the code wr
This is a heads up for those like Bert and Wilbert who write editing
support environments for Lilypond.
I currently have a patch in for review which will allow Lily to redirect
the backend output to another file for particular \book blocks.
Currently you do this by setting environment variable
22 matches
Mail list logo
