Robert Schmaus writes:
>>
>> I do not understand R1*4?
>
> R is a full bar rest of the specified duration. Thus, R1 is a full bar
> rest that only makes sense in a 4/4 context. Duration-wise it spans
> the same time as r1, but is placed in the middle of the bar instead on
> the starting beat (or
>
> I do not understand R1*4?
R is a full bar rest of the specified duration. Thus, R1 is a full bar rest
that only makes sense in a 4/4 context. Duration-wise it spans the same time as
r1, but is placed in the middle of the bar instead on the starting beat (or
moment). Likewise R2 is a full
I do not understand R1*4?
May be you wanted something like that, does not make sense for me and
may be there are better versions possible, anyway ...
%~~~
\version "2.18.2"
\header {
title = "merging rests"
}
global
nipped, which I found in the manual.
It doesn't work.
What's the mistake, any idea?
Thanks very much!
Cheers
Martin
PS:
MY EXAMPLE:
version "2.18.2"
header {
title = "merging rests"
}
global = { time 4/4 }
Key = { key gmajor }
%% -- Piano --
rhUpper = r
(finalize . ,(lambda (translator)
(for-each merge-mmrests rests)))
(acknowledgers
(rest-interface . ,(lambda (engraver grob source-engraver)
(if (eq? 'MultiMeasureRest (assoc-ref
(ly:grob-property grob 'meta) &
Description: Binary data
\version "2.18.2"\header { title = "merging rests"}global = { \time 4/4 }Key = { \key g\major }%% -- Piano --rhUpper = \relative c''{ \voiceOne \Key R1*4g4 r8 g r2 |}rhLower = \relative c' { \voiceTwo \KeyR1*4b4 r8 b r2 |}lh
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: Phil Holmes
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:30:50 +
To: James Lowe , "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: Re: Merging Rests in Single Staff with more than one 'voice'
>- Original Message -
>From: "James Lowe"
>T
- Original Message -
From: "James Lowe"
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 5:52 PM
Subject: Merging Rests in Single Staff with more than one 'voice'
Hello,
I don't often use multiple voices in a single staff, so am a bit
unfamiliar and am still finding
taff the
>>> rests that both voices share are only printed once.
>>>
>>> For example
>>>
>>>
>>> \musicSourceOne = { a4 b c d | R1*4 | a4 r b r2 }
>>> \musicSourceTwo = { f4 r f r | R1*4 | f4 f g r2 }
>>
>> Your example is very simple, so mergin
cSourceTwo = { f4 r f r | R1*4 | f4 f g r2 }
>
> Your example is very simple, so merging is good or at least not
> bad. In single staff polyphony which is not very simple, merging
> rests is a very bad idea because it ruins the integrity of the
> voices and can create arresting ambig
is good or at least not
bad. In single staff polyphony which is not very simple, merging
rests is a very bad idea because it ruins the integrity of the
voices and can create arresting ambiguities. It ought not to be a
candidate for default behavior with the notable exception of the
whole measure or
Hello
-Original Message-
From: Xavier Scheuer
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 19:06:14 +0100
To: James Lowe
Cc: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: Re: Merging Rests in Single Staff with more than one 'voice'
>On 22 January 2011 18:52, James Lowe wrote:
>>
>
On 22 January 2011 18:52, James Lowe wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't often use multiple voices in a single staff, so am a bit
> unfamiliar and am still finding my way.
>
> However I cannot easily see how I can take two 'voices' each from a single
> source such that when they are combined on a single
Hello,
I don't often use multiple voices in a single staff, so am a bit
unfamiliar and am still finding my way.
However I cannot easily see how I can take two 'voices' each from a single
source such that when they are combined on a single staff the rests that
both voices share are only printed on
Op maandag 13 september 2010 schreef bart:
> I have found a way to merge rests when there are two voices on one stave,
> but which evolve as one voice, to limit clutter on the score on this page :
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336 .
>
> It is very usefull indeed, but isn't there a more ge
The last thing to do is to merge the R1/ You can do :
\new Staff <<
s4-\markup{Merge rests as per standard notation practice.}
\relative c'' { c4 d e b\rest | r2 e4 g | _*b,1\rest*_ } \\
\relative c'' { c4 b a b\rest | r a g2 | _*b1\rest *_}
>>
*but these are not centered.*
So you have to do
Well, I'm completly amazed by scheme function, which I'm totally
unable to build. What I'd have done instead is :
\score {
\new Score <<
\new Staff <<
s4-\markup{LilyPond default, rests in both voices.}
\relative c'' { c4 d e r | r2 e4 g | R1 } \\
\relative c'' { c4 b
Hi,
I have found a way to merge rests when there are two voices on one stave,
but which evolve as one voice, to limit clutter on the score on this page :
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336 .
It is very usefull indeed, but isn't there a more general way to merge
rests. It's a lot of code for
Mats,
Thanks for the pointer. Somehow, I think of better search terms when I
know there's something to find.
The discussion that I found shows how to merge full- and multi-measure
rests explicitly, when the corresponding rests have been identified
(this seems to be essentially the same idea shown
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 14:16 +0100, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> On 12 February 2010 17:54, Michael J. O'Donnell
>
> > I also need to merge whole-measure and multi-measure rests, which, alas,
> > the snippet doesn't cover. I will poke into extending the snippet. If
> > you've already tried, and know w
On 12 February 2010 17:54, Michael J. O'Donnell
wrote:
> Thanks for the tip. That gets me a long way.
You're welcome!
> I also need to merge whole-measure and multi-measure rests, which, alas,
> the snippet doesn't cover. I will poke into extending the snippet. If
> you've already tried, and k
o, any hints about automatic merging of rests in single-staff polyphony
>> will be greatly valued.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>
> Merging rests automatically...
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336
>
> should do the trick. ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Xavi
polyphony
> will be greatly valued.
>
> Cheers,
Merging rests automatically...
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336
should do the trick. ;-)
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I am setting S-A-T-B choral music on two staves, S-A on treble and T-B
on bass. Most of the time, the two voices on a staff have the same
rests, which look much better when they are merged. I haven't found a
command to do this automatically. I have been making a separate voice of
shared rests, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> ...
> << \context Voice = melody {\voiceOne f g} \\ { \voiceTwo d e } >>
> \oneVoice r4 ...}
>
> or
>
> \context Voice = melody {
> ...
> << {\voiceOne f g} \new Voice {\voiceTwo d e } >> \oneVoice r4 ...}
>
> or to exploit that the Voice contexts created by <<{...}
P Scott Horne wrote:
In a song with a short polyphonic section at the end, I wrote something like
this:
<< { f g } \\ { d e } >> r4 << { a b } \\ { f g } >>
It worked as expected, giving a single rest appropriately centred on the
staff. This approach seemed more sensible than defining s
cott Horne
> -Original Message-
> From: Ruud van Silfhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 6 décembre 2004 14:31
> To: Lilypond user
> Cc: P Scott Horne; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Fw: Merging rests in single-staff polyphony
>
> Hi,
>
> I think this q
D]>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 5:56 AM
Subject: [Mutopia-discuss] Merging rests in single-staff polyphony
> In a song with a short polyphonic section at the end, I wrote something
like
> this:
>
> << { f g } \\ { d e } >> r4 << { a b } \\ { f g } >>
>
When there were equal length simulteanous rests in two voices in the
same staves in former versions I wrote:
<< { r4 } \\ { s4 } >>
This way the rest was centered, as if it were merged.
How to center (merge) rests in current version?
Thanks,
Bert
___
29 matches
Mail list logo
