Hi Urs,
> It is surprising that LilyPond makes it that hard to move a
> single note that doesn't have any dependencies …
Is this maybe a case where #'extra-offset is your [current] best option?
Of course, I don’t love it… but I don’t shy away from using it [via the
edition-engraver] when
Am 09.12.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 09.12.2015 17:07, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>> Hi Urs,
>>
>>> It is surprising that LilyPond makes it that hard to move a
>>> single note that doesn't have any dependencies …
>> Is this maybe a case where #'extra-offset is your [current] best
On 09.12.2015 17:07, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Urs,
It is surprising that LilyPond makes it that hard to move a
single note that doesn't have any dependencies …
Is this maybe a case where #'extra-offset is your [current] best option?
It’s possible to wrap into a music function to deal with
"Urs Liska" wrote Friday, December 04, 2015 10:59 AM
> Am 04.12.2015 um 11:54 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>> \once ] \override Arpeggio.minimum-X-extent =#'(-1 . 0)
>
> This creates additional space by moving the Arpeggio to the right. But I
> want the fourth note e' to move to the left because
Am 04.12.2015 um 11:54 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> \once ] \override Arpeggio.minimum-X-extent =#'(-1 . 0)
This creates additional space by moving the Arpeggio to the right. But I
want the fourth note e' to move to the left because the intention is to
keep the regularity of the left hand intact.
Urs Liska wrote Friday, December 04, 2015 10:23 AM
> As discussed recently (starting here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2015-11/msg00054.html)
> LilyPond's optical spacing can have side-effects. If you consider the
> first attachment you can see that the quavers of the left
Am 04.12.2015 um 11:23 schrieb Urs Liska:
> How could I achieve what I need?
And for experimenting, here's the code
%
\version "2.19.32"
music = {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff {
c'16 e'
% place this override before the a' or the e' to experiment
As discussed recently (starting here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2015-11/msg00054.html)
LilyPond's optical spacing can have side-effects. If you consider the
first attachment you can see that the quavers of the left hand are
spaced irregularly because LilyPond moves the fourth
Am 04.12.2015 um 12:12 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> "Urs Liska" wrote Friday, December 04, 2015 10:59 AM
>
>> Am 04.12.2015 um 11:54 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>>> \once ] \override Arpeggio.minimum-X-extent =#'(-1 . 0)
>> This creates additional space by moving the Arpeggio to the right. But I
>>
