Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

2015-02-08 Thread Noeck
Hi Kieren, the output has indeed only one dot. But at least here it puts the dot in the upper staff space (where the e'' is) and not next to the rest. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

2015-02-08 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Cynthia, I guess the only way out is to rewrite the two voices so that one of them issues hidden rests in the score, but the rests in the parts, via tags. Not at all… I can think of about a half-dozen other ways to make that happen in Lilypond. This would be my preference, since it would

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

2015-02-08 Thread Cynthia Karl
On Feb 7, 2015, at 9:07 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote: Hi Cynthia, In fact the output generated is just nonsensical. Two stacked augmentation dots? That just doesn’t seem right. No, it’s perfectly sensible, if you want (need) to make it visually explicit

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

2015-02-08 Thread Kevin Barry
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com wrote: But I don’t want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I want to make it visually explicit that there is a single voice. That’s why each voice has issued the \oneVoice command before asserting the r2. And why

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

2015-02-08 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 08.02.2015 21:32, schrieb Kevin Barry: On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com mailto:pck...@mac.com wrote: But I don't want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I want to make it visually explicit that there is a single voice. That's why

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

2015-02-07 Thread Paul Scott
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 08:49:52PM -0600, Cynthia Karl wrote: Message: 2 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 18:24:30 -0800 From: Mark Stephen Mrotek carsonm...@ca.rr.com To: 'Cynthia Karl' pck...@mac.com, lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: RE: Problem with r2. in two voices Message-ID

RE: Problem with r2. in two voices

2015-02-07 Thread Cynthia Karl
Message: 2 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 18:24:30 -0800 From: Mark Stephen Mrotek carsonm...@ca.rr.com To: 'Cynthia Karl' pck...@mac.com,lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: RE: Problem with r2. in two voices Message-ID: 00c201d04346$5ef30160$1cd90420$@ca.rr.com Content-Type: text/plain

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

2015-02-07 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Cynthia, In fact the output generated is just nonsensical. Two stacked augmentation dots? That just doesn’t seem right. No, it’s perfectly sensible, if you want (need) to make it visually explicit that there are two voices at the same time — otherwise, how would the reader know?

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

2015-02-07 Thread Brett Duncan
On 8/02/15 12:46 PM, Cynthia Karl wrote: I don’t understand two things about the following snippet: \version 2.19.15 Aa = \relative c'' {\oneVoice r2. } Ab = \relative c'' {\oneVoice r2. } \score { \new Staff \time 3/4 \new Voice \Aa

Problem with r2. in two voices

2015-02-07 Thread Cynthia Karl
I don’t understand two things about the following snippet: \version 2.19.15 Aa = \relative c'' {\oneVoice r2. } Ab = \relative c'' {\oneVoice r2. } \score { \new Staff \time 3/4 \new Voice \Aa \new Voice \Ab \layout {}

RE: Problem with r2. in two voices

2015-02-07 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
, 2015 5:47 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Problem with r2. in two voices I don’t understand two things about the following snippet: \version 2.19.15 Aa = \relative c'' {\oneVoice r2. } Ab = \relative c'' {\oneVoice r2. } \score { \new Staff