I am working on a piece of choir music. It consists of two parts, the
first of which is written on one staff, and the second two staves. The
upper staff in part two is a continuation of the staff in part one. All
the staves are accompanied with lyrics. My wish is that this lyrics
should be writ
tting lyrics below its staff?
I am working on a piece of choir music. It consists of two parts, the first
of which is written on one staff, and the second two staves. The upper staff in
part two is a continuation of the staff in part one. All the staves are
accompanied with lyrics. My wish is
tes.
3. The second staff's empty measures are removed via two overrides
\RemoveEmptyStaves and \override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-first = ##t
4. Each set of Lyrics is placed immediately after its staff so there is
no need to direct it above or below anything
I hope that this provide
On 5/21/15 5:23 PM, "Kaj Persson" wrote:
>The example shows, that LilyPond perfectly understands the implied
>structure and it also understands which lyric belongs to which note.
>So that is not the problem. A minor issue is that the lyrics for the
>top staff is broken into separ
On 5/22/15 10:03 AM, "70147pers...@telia.com" <70147pers...@telia.com>
wrote:
>
>Hi Carl!
>
>Yes, you are the person with the big understanding. I learned t from
>your solution, that you can, and in this case must, do things inside
>open parenthesis.
I am concerned that
Hi Kaj,
in general you are right: In case there is only one expression,
duplicating the 'brackets', << >> or { } is not needed. You can even
write a single note without brackets:
\new Staff a
but of course not two:
\new Staff a b
At the top level you need something to tell LilyPond that this is m
Hi Noeck
Sorry for a late answer. I have been away from home and not being able
to read my e-mail.
On 2015-05-23 20:41, Noeck wrote:
Hi Kaj,
in general you are right: In case there is only one expression,
duplicating the 'brackets', << >> or { } is not needed. You can even
write a single not
laced immediately after its staff so there
is no need to direct it above or below anything
I hope that this provides a clearer logic to how to construct a score
that is quite obvious to what's happening (to the user) and relatively
mistake-proof in interpretation (for LilyPond).
Regards
On 2015-05-22 02:18, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 5/21/15 5:23 PM, "Kaj Persson" wrote:
The example shows, that LilyPond perfectly understands the implied
structure and it also understands which lyric belongs to which note.
So that is not the problem. A minor issue is that the lyrics f
On 2015-05-22 22:02, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 5/22/15 10:03 AM, "70147pers...@telia.com" <70147pers...@telia.com>
wrote:
Hi Carl!
Yes, you are the person with the big understanding. I learned t from
your solution, that you can, and in this case must, do things inside
10 matches
Mail list logo
