Re: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this?

2019-07-03 Thread David Kastrup
Evan Driscoll writes: > The difference between << {...} // {...} >> and chords I get -- but what > about << {...} {...} >> *without* the //, for example in the first three > lines of my snippet? Those seem to work the same as collating the > corresponding notes in chords. They are pretty much

RE: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this?

2019-07-03 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
n Mrotek Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List Subject: Re: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this? The difference between << {...} // {...} >> and chords I get -- but what about << {...} {...} >> *without* the //, for example in the first three lines of my

Re: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this?

2019-07-03 Thread Evan Driscoll
The difference between << {...} // {...} >> and chords I get -- but what about << {...} {...} >> *without* the //, for example in the first three lines of my snippet? Those seem to work the same as collating the corresponding notes in chords. Evan On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 11:48 AM Mark Stephen

RE: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this?

2019-07-03 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Evan, As to your “bonus” question, <<{….}//{….}>> creates two separate voices, as in polyphony, While <..> creates a chord. Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Evan Driscoll Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2019 8:54 PM To:

Re: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this?

2019-07-02 Thread Evan Driscoll
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:21 AM Evan Driscoll wrote: > (That obviously *isn't* playable. Answers I'm considering include... > playing open A instead of open D) > Strike that; reverse it. Evan > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this?

2019-07-02 Thread Evan Driscoll
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:55 PM Malte Meyn wrote: > Am 03.07.19 um 06:36 schrieb Evan Driscoll: > > It's for cello, and just the part, no score. > > Is that playable? I sadly haven’t touched my cello for a few months now > and it’s 350 km away so I can’t try but I think I couldn’t play that >

Re: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this?

2019-07-02 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 03.07.19 um 06:36 schrieb Evan Driscoll: It's for cello, and just the part, no score. Is that playable? I sadly haven’t touched my cello for a few months now and it’s 350 km away so I can’t try but I think I couldn’t play that passage despite having long fingers … It's a transcription

Re: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this?

2019-07-02 Thread Evan Driscoll
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:21 PM Malte Meyn wrote: > Important question: What instrument(s) will play this? Is this from a > part or a full score? > Sorry, I should have included that. I edited out a bunch of wordiness in my email and that went with it. It's for cello, and just the part, no

Re: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this?

2019-07-02 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 03.07.19 um 05:54 schrieb Evan Driscoll: I've got a couple measures that I'm struggling to even figure out what I want the result from Lilypond to be. I've pasted the snippet below. As picky connoisseurs of good notation, I'm wondering what other people would do or like to see. :-) I'm