The 'correct' version for system 10.5.8 on a PPC chip should be the
PPC binary. The direct link to the 2.13.9 binary is here:
http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/darwin-ppc/
lilypond-2.13.9-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
On 17.12.2009, at 19:04, Robert Ley wrote:
The 'correct' version for
On 17.12.2009, at 18:22, Robert Ley wrote:
So i do not think the problem is with you at all.
The console shows this message:
Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:05:46 AM US/Pacific
Dec 17 09:06:44 rdlpowerbook LilyPond[231]: 'exceptions.OSError'>: [Errno 86] Bad CPU type in executable
You've do
So i do not think the problem is with you at all.
Thanks. I was beginning to wonder...
Indeed you are able to get this working on an external disk - which
makes no real sense to me, only because if it works on an external
disk it should work on an internal disk, the operating system is the
Robert,
Don't worry, we all want this to work for you :)
The simple fact is that the latest version of Lilypond (2.13.x) should
simply be able to be dragged to your desktop or application folder and
you can double click it and you get the welcome screen.
There is no need at all that you shou
Le mercredi 16 décembre 2009 à 18:56 -0600, Tim McNamara a écrit :
> I don't buy the generalized Unix notion that "doing things the hard
> way is a virtue."
Where do you get this notion from? Note that the most popular operating
systems except Microsoft ones are Unix-based. It's not doing thin
Tim McNamara wrote:
On Dec 16, 2009, at 8:55 AM, John Mandereau wrote:
Le mardi 15 décembre 2009 à 20:20 -0600, Tim McNamara a écrit :
Wouldn't it be simplest to set the Reply-To header to the list? Then
all replies go to the list by default.
No. For good reasons about this, see
http://ww
Don't worry, I've not lost patience; however, you seem to not be
hearing me. I understand that two methods of using lilypond did not
work for you: the GUI application that comes with lilypond, and a
script for terminal use. There are other ways of using lilypond. I'm
asking you to see if an
On Dec 16, 2009, at 8:55 AM, John Mandereau wrote:
Le mardi 15 décembre 2009 à 20:20 -0600, Tim McNamara a écrit :
Wouldn't it be simplest to set the Reply-To header to the list? Then
all replies go to the list by default.
No. For good reasons about this, see
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply
Having seen this, I would suggest first to re-download, and see if
that solves the problem. Then I would suggest to try compiling from
terminal:
LilyPond.app -> (right-click) -> Show Package Contents -> Contents ->
Resources -> bin -> lilypond drop this onto a terminal window.
Drop the lilyp
First and foremost, *I* am not in a position to change anything with
the programming. But any problems you encounter will certainly help
the people who do the programming to make the end-user experience
better.
Having read your other email, as I understand it, you downloaded a
script and
James Bailey wrote:
I'm really sorry you couldn't get it to work. After months of the GUI
not working at all on 10.5/10.6, there appeared to be a fix which has
worked for every other user. So, unless you can give anyone on the list
some more details about what you did, which version you were
I'm really sorry you couldn't get it to work. After months of the GUI
not working at all on 10.5/10.6, there appeared to be a fix which has
worked for every other user. So, unless you can give anyone on the
list some more details about what you did, which version you were
using, and what pr
Le mardi 15 décembre 2009 à 20:20 -0600, Tim McNamara a écrit :
> Wouldn't it be simplest to set the Reply-To header to the list? Then
> all replies go to the list by default.
No. For good reasons about this, see
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Best,
John
signature.asc
Descri
- Original Message -
From: Tim McNamara
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 6:18 pm
Subject: Re: GUI (was: Re: No Work!
To: lilypond-user
>
> On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Kees van den Doel wrote:
>
> > If lilypond came with a rudimentary GUI I think it would at
> l
On Dec 15, 2009, at 7:09 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Federico Bruni
wrote:
Il 15/12/2009 12:22, Philip Potter ha scritto:
Please keep all discussion on list - the easiest way to do this
is to
click "Reply All" and ensure that lilypond-user@gnu.org is in t
On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Kees van den Doel wrote:
If lilypond came with a rudimentary GUI I think it would at least
octuple the number of people trying it out.
Something simple like a window with File/compile menus, a text
editor pane, compile messages at bottom,
and a score preview.
ue.
Kees
- Original Message -
From: Valentin Villenave
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:24 am
Subject: Re: GUI (was: Re: No Work!
To: Kees van den Doel
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Kees van den Doel
wrote:
If lilypond came with a rudimentary GUI I
e a plan for a serious IDE, I think that's a
> different issue.
>
> Kees
> - Original Message -
> From: Valentin Villenave
> Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:24 am
> Subject: Re: GUI (was: Re: No Work!
> To: Kees van den Doel
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.or
;where is the program??"), and move on.
What you point to looks like a plan for a serious IDE, I think that's a
different issue.
Kees
- Original Message -
From: Valentin Villenave
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:24 am
Subject: Re: GUI (was: Re: No Work!
To: Kees van den Doel
uot;,
> open various example files, change a few notes, and they're hooked!
>
> Kees
> - Original Message -
> From: James Lowe
> Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 8:41 am
> Subject: Re: No Work!
> To: Robert Ley
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>
> > >
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Kees van den Doel wrote:
> If lilypond came with a rudimentary GUI I think it would at least octuple the
> number of people trying it out.
You mean like http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/LilyPond_GUI ? We'll
it's being worked on, though we lack people and resourc
ample files, change a few notes, and they're hooked!
>
> Kees
> - Original Message -
> From: James Lowe
> Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 8:41 am
> Subject: Re: No Work!
> To: Robert Ley
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>
> > > I don't see a log for Lilypon
don't
know what a shell or
a text editor is to try it out. They can then start the "lilypond program",
open various example files, change a few notes, and they're hooked!
Kees
- Original Message -
From: James Lowe
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 8:41 am
Subject: Re: No
I don't see a log for Lilypond and the finder log doesn't have anything for
Lilypond in it. Can you suggest where to look?
RDL
Please can you confirm a few things because it really is not clear.
1. Can you save the example file to the desktop with a file name?
2. If you can save the file and
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il 15/12/2009 12:22, Philip Potter ha scritto:
>>
>> Please keep all discussion on list - the easiest way to do this is to
>> click "Reply All" and ensure that lilypond-user@gnu.org is in the To:
>> or Cc: list.
>
> I recently realized that
Le mardi 15 décembre 2009 à 12:39 +0100, Federico Bruni a écrit :
> [OT]
> I recently realized that a good practice is not using Cc, unless you
> have to reply to a person who is not subscribed to the mailing list.
> The problem is that not all email clients are able to handle the reply
> well.
>
Il 15/12/2009 12:22, Philip Potter ha scritto:
Robert,
are you clicking "Reply" instead of "Reply all"? I haven't seen any of
your messages since the first one, and they aren't appearing in the
archives. This can happen if you send replies just to one person and
not to the whole list.
Please ke
Robert,
are you clicking "Reply" instead of "Reply all"? I haven't seen any of
your messages since the first one, and they aren't appearing in the
archives. This can happen if you send replies just to one person and
not to the whole list.
Please keep all discussion on list - the easiest way to do
Robert,
You don't give much information that I can think of that is causing the
problem here, the welcome file should compile with no additional steps
other than you must save the file and it has a valid name.
Can I ask you if you have not done this, but to copy the lilypond.app to
the deskt
Have you tried any of the methods that don't include using the built-
in editor? It's designed to make an introduction to lilypond easier,
but in your case, that hasn't worked. That having been said, the
editor that ships with lilypond is slightly less useful than using
TextEdit, so you may
section in the learning guide.
Try that...see if that at least gets you going.
James
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of James
Bailey
Sent: Mon 14/12/2009 20:16
To: Robert Ley
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: No Work!
Sorr
Sorry, I can't help you. Amazing as it sounds, the instructions in
the documentation http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/
lilypond-program/Setup-for-MacOS-X#Setup-for-MacOS-X actually worked
for me, so I've never used any of the methods on the website, except
to see how jEdit fa
Which script? What does the site say to do to make it run? I know
there are at least three different methods listed at the website on
ways to use lilypond. At lest two of which, I know from first-hand
experience work perfectly, the others of which, I know from second-
hand experience work p
I don't know if you know about it, but the link from the download
page on lilypond.org for osx 10.5 has several methods of getting
lilypond to work.
http://ivo.bouwmans.name/lilypondleopard/
On 13.12.2009, at 19:14, Robert Ley wrote:
Re: Version 2.12.2-1
Downloaded both documentation and pr
Did you follow the instructions in the text file? There's no graphical
interface for this program. The text file tells you how you go about
creating a score with Lilypond.
Save the file by doing File>Save As>testfile.ly
Then choose Compile>Typeset File (my memory may be faulty here)
It's possible
35 matches
Mail list logo
