Re: Dotted notes

2018-04-20 Thread foxfanfare
Thomas Morley-2 wrote > Please post some code. so that we can debug what's wrong and why.The code > was developed with 2.19.81 so at least the example works for me. Actually, if I just copy/paste your exemple above, I don't get any error message it works fine, except that when I change the Staff.D

Re: Dotted notes

2018-04-19 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi, today I'm too tired to work on anything complicated ... Though, some remarks: 2018-04-19 17:23 GMT+02:00 foxfanfare : > foxfanfare wrote > Anyway, I tried your code this morning, but I wasn't able to get the desired > result. Maybe because I use the 2.19.80 version. I will try again later thi

Re: Dotted notes

2018-04-19 Thread foxfanfare
foxfanfare wrote > Anyway, I tried your code this morning, but I wasn't able to get the > desiredresult. Maybe because I use the 2.19.80 version. I will try again > later thisafternoon. Okay I tested with the 2.19.81 version but the DotColumn.padding and details.dots-padding-factor doesn't seem to

Re: Dotted notes

2018-04-19 Thread foxfanfare
Thomas Morley-2 wrote > Hi, > > obviously the flags from the beethoven-font have less y-extent. > Sometimes too less, so DotColumn doesn't notice there's flag which > should be avoided. > (I've cc-ed the original author of the font. Maybe he joins the > discussion.) > > To watch the values uncomm

Re: Dotted notes

2018-04-18 Thread Thomas Morley
2018-04-19 1:56 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley : > obviously the flags from the beethoven-font have less y-extent. > Sometimes too less, so DotColumn doesn't notice there's flag which > should be avoided. > (I've cc-ed the original author of the font. Maybe he joins the discussion.) Actually I forgot to

Re: Dotted notes

2018-04-18 Thread Thomas Morley
2018-04-17 23:34 GMT+02:00 foxfanfare : > I struggle on this: > > \version "2.19.80" > > \paper { > #(set-paper-size "a7") > } > \bookpart { > > \score { > \relative c' { > \cadenzaOn > \omit Staff.TimeSignature > c1.^"Default" d4.. e8... f16 > } > } > } > > \boo

Re: Dotted notes

2014-01-12 Thread Ed Gordijn
Hi Kieren, Thanks for looking up the engraving rules. According to Gould — which is, nowadays, the musical analogue of “according to Hoyle” — the *tie* should be adjusted and not the *dot*. So Boosey & Hawkes’s style is not the convention, but rather an editorial quirk. I tweaked Lilypond's

Re: Dotted notes

2014-01-11 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Ed, > [Boosey & Hawkes] use \dotsDown when there is something (slur, tie, fermata) > above the dotted note. > Should Lilypond do that too? According to Gould — which is, nowadays, the musical analogue of “according to Hoyle” — the *tie* should be adjusted and not the *dot*. So Boosey & Hawke

Re: Dotted Notes - Dots on staff lines...:(

2008-09-23 Thread Graham Percival
Use 2.11.59. Cheers, - Graham On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT) George_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi guys > > I moved to Ubuntu 8.04 a few months ago, and I've been typesetting my > music there since then, with Lilypond 2.11.55. One problem I've > noticed is that since I restarted

RE: dotted notes

2006-12-09 Thread Kress, Stephen
That's because you need to be using ASCII "2E", not "E2". This is the standard period character and is what LilyPond is looking for. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 12/9/2006 10:56 AM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: dotted notes S