Re: Re[4]: Frescobaldi?

2024-05-06 Thread Jean Abou Samra
> I'm an intermediate-level python programmer but I might be able to help with > busy work like typing and documenting functions, with some feedback.  Anything > to give back to a project that I use all the time! Thanks. However, without wanting to stop you from contributing, I'll reiterate that

Re: Re[4]: Frescobaldi?

2024-05-06 Thread Tom Brennan
I think that all sounds good, but that kind of rework is probably going to involve a lot of regression risk (what are the tests like right now?), but also a ton of opportunities for improvements to the extent that it might be a good time to make a break from backward functional compatibility,

Re: Re[4]: Frescobaldi?

2024-05-06 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le lundi 06 mai 2024 à 14:05 +, Steph Phillips a écrit : > Well, I'm glad you asked about feedback because I'm curious what other > folks who contribute to Frescobaldi might think. > > After digging around in the codebase, I'm wondering if the application > might benefit from a more

Re: Re[4]: Frescobaldi?

2024-05-06 Thread Knute Snortum
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 7:06 AM Steph Phillips wrote: > Well, I'm glad you asked about feedback because I'm curious what other > folks who contribute to Frescobaldi might think. > > After digging around in the codebase, I'm wondering if the application > might benefit from a more object-oriented

Re[4]: Frescobaldi?

2024-05-06 Thread Steph Phillips
Well, I'm glad you asked about feedback because I'm curious what other folks who contribute to Frescobaldi might think. After digging around in the codebase, I'm wondering if the application might benefit from a more object-oriented design. It's definitely in Python, but with more of C-style