Re: ****SPAM:5.7**** Re: skip of defined length in lyrics?

David, thanks for this. I had abandoned the melismaBusy method, as it was throwing up all sorts of artefacts (blank bars and partially-blank bars, etc.) when applied in a polyphonic setting. And the fixes for parts starting with rests were beginning to make the source file rather

Re: [Spam] RE: Clef change placement

Thanks Aaron, great example! JM > Le 4 févr. 2020 à 06:05, Aaron Hill a écrit : > > On 2020-02-03 1:54 pm, Rutger Hofman wrote: >> I would also welcome this feature. How difficult is it to write a >> [Scheme] engraver? > > The mechanics of defining and using a Scheme engraver are relatively

Re: [Spam] RE: Clef change placement

On 2020-02-03 1:54 pm, Rutger Hofman wrote: I would also welcome this feature. How difficult is it to write a [Scheme] engraver? The mechanics of defining and using a Scheme engraver are relatively simple: \version "2.19.83" Custom_engraver = #(lambda (context) ;; The let block can

Re: [Spam] RE: Clef change placement

I would also welcome this feature. How difficult is it to write a [Scheme] engraver? Rutger On 2/2/20 6:55 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote: -Original Message- From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca] Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2020 11:15 AM To: Daniel Rosen Cc:

RE: [SPAM] Re: Score Wizard Fresco 3.1

On 02.01.20 13:19, Peter Gentry wrote: > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 17:31:10 -0700 (MST) > From: Michael Rivers > > The score wizard does nothing for me in Frescobaldi 3.1 (Windows > version). I uninstalled it and reinstalled the old version, whose > score wizard works fine. >

Re: [Spam] Notes or chords sustained with a pedal

Hi Robert, I use trickery: 1) with a shortened first note duration to stop the first tie 2) with hidden notes to get ties to start/stop at a time I want \version "2.21.0" % By Nick Payne. Hide notes etc but also avoid (invisible) collisions. transOn = { \override NoteColumn.ignore-collision

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

Aaron Hill writes: > On 2019-12-13 3:54 am, David Kastrup wrote: >> Peter writes: >>> A regular oddity is the message no glyph for U+92 in the .off file ? >>> significant? >> It means that in the given font there is no backslash. Text font >> layout >> of TeX fonts tends to be a bit weird but

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

> pango-font.cc emits the warning with %0X, so that U+ number is in > hex. BTW, I've now slightly adjusted the warning message in git to make LilyPond emit 'U+0092' instead of 'U+92' – the 'U+' notation should return at least four uppercase hex digits. Werner

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

On 2019-12-13 3:54 am, David Kastrup wrote: Peter writes: A regular oddity is the message no glyph for U+92 in the .off file ? significant? It means that in the given font there is no backslash. Text font layout of TeX fonts tends to be a bit weird but nevertheless this seems strange.

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

Please do not take discussions off the list without bothering to announce it. Resent, this time with list included. Peter writes: > Yes I did manually change using the Fresco snippet but only after the > problem in order to put all the files on the current version number. I > appreciate that

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On Fri 14 Dec 2018 at 17:32:59 (+1100), Andrew Bernard wrote: > I was so disappointed with the complete mess the current abc2ly makes of > Irish tunes from the vast repository at thesession.org that I started > looking into this. The others mentioned that using abc2xml and then using > musixxml2ly

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Hi Laura, I was so disappointed with the complete mess the current abc2ly makes of Irish tunes from the vast repository at thesession.org that I started looking into this. The others mentioned that using abc2xml and then using musixxml2ly supplied with lilypond is the way forward. I found this to

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

> "Andrew" == Andrew Bernard writes: Andrew> I had such poor results with abc2ly just recently that I Andrew> can't imagine there is any user base using it in earnest, or Andrew> even at all, else there would be lots of complaints. Or Andrew> perhaps I was doing something

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:21:44 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > It sounds reasonable to drop the current abc2ly implementation. However, > I think we shouldn't do this without somehow including abc2xml in the > distribution and (probably) create a wrapper script abc2ly that > transparently replaces

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Hi Urs, I had such poor results with abc2ly just recently that I can't imagine there is any user base using it in earnest, or even at all, else there would be lots of complaints. Or perhaps I was doing something wrong. I feel that it does not deserve a place in the stable. I think instead of

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Am 10.12.18 um 12:18 schrieb Andrew Bernard: Hi Rutger, this is great. But I think you mean this page: https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/abc2xml.html [Took me a while to figure that out.] I conclude it's not worth spending any energy on lilypond abc2ly. Sounds like it should even be dropped,

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Hi Rutger, this is great. But I think you mean this page: https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/abc2xml.html [Took me a while to figure that out.] I conclude it's not worth spending any energy on lilypond abc2ly. Sounds like it should even be dropped, and perhaps the NR could day how to achieve ABC to

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, Rutger Hofman wrote: Isn't it possible (and easy) to use Wim Vree's utility abc2xml, see https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/xml2abc.html to convert to MusicXML and then convert the MusicXML into lilypond? From a maintenance/engineering view, it is much preferable to have

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On 10-12-18 10:40, Andrew Bernard wrote: Hi Johan, Having recently become interested in Irish Traditional Music where there are countless tens of thousands of tunes in ABC, the de facto standard for the tradition, I'd be keen to see abc2ly brought up to date. My tests with it on a sample of

Re: [Spam] Re: Partcombine not working for orchestral parts?

On 7/20/2018 9:41 AM, Rutger Hofman wrote: On 16-07-18 17:29, Ben wrote: On 7/13/2018 2:25 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Ben, I probably confused you with my wording, sorry! I just meant it's above the staff when it's supposed to be (in rare situations where dynamics are technically

Re: [Spam] Re: Partcombine not working for orchestral parts?

On 16-07-18 17:29, Ben wrote: On 7/13/2018 2:25 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Ben, I probably confused you with my wording, sorry! I just meant it's above the staff when it's supposed to be (in rare situations where dynamics are technically different between the same instrument

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On 2018-06-15 13:39, David Kastrup wrote: Karlin High writes: On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer! Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does. The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

Karlin High writes: > On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer! >> Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does. > > The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or > something? I think the term is

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer! Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does. The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or something? -- Karlin High Missouri, USA

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

David Sumbler writes: > On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 21:08 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: >> On 15.06.2018 20:11, David Sumbler wrote: >> > >> > I had seen the usable-duration-log variable in the Internals >> > Reference, >> > and its default value of '(-3 -2 -1 0) .  But I have no idea what >> > these

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 21:08 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 15.06.2018 20:11, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > I had seen the usable-duration-log variable in the Internals > > Reference, > > and its default value of '(-3 -2 -1 0) .  But I have no idea what > > these > > values represent.  Can you

Re: {SPAM 04.0} Re: Strange warnings

On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 15:36 -0400, Ben wrote: > On 5/25/2018 2:58 PM, David Sumbler wrote: > > I did eventually solve the problem, thanks to an off-list nudge > > from > > Joe Davenport.  I had some text spanners in a \global variable, > > which > > was not a good idea when some of the staves are

Re: {SPAM 04.0} Re: Strange warnings

On 5/25/2018 2:58 PM, David Sumbler wrote: On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 19:23 +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: Le 25/05/2018 à 17:42, David Sumbler a écrit : The only thing I have managed to establish is that it seems to be related to the 1st violins and cellos, which have staves arranged thus:

Re: {SPAM 04.0} Re: Strange warnings

On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 19:23 +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > Le 25/05/2018 à 17:42, David Sumbler a écrit : > > > > > > The only thing I have managed to establish is that it seems to be > > related to the 1st violins and cellos, which have staves arranged > > thus: > >   << > >    

Re: {SPAM 04.7} Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

David Sumbler writes: > The automatic creation of contexts is obviously very useful, especially > when one is just a beginner at Lilypond.  But I almost wish that there > were an option to turn it off, which would be useful for forcing > oneself to understand how this all

Re: {SPAM 04.7} Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 23:55 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > It seems that if, in a > > <<{\musicA} {\musicB}>> > > passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music > > before > > the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music

Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote: It seems that if, in a <<{\musicA} {\musicB}>> passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music before the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music afterwards will all be treated as belonging to the same voice.  Is that correct? Have

Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 18:43 +0200, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: > Hi David, > > Am 03.05.2018 um 18:29 schrieb David Sumbler: > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > > > \new Staff { > >    \time 6/8 > >    << > >  { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10 > >    R2. | r4. e'''~ } > >

Re: [Spam] Partcombine with rests

Rutger, So: add \partcombineApart before bar 2 in either of your voices. You can revert in two ways: (1) \undo \partcombineApart (2) \partcombineAutomatic Ah, stupid me! I only tried \once \partcombineApart which didn't work. (I don't understand much of Lilypond's internals so can't tell

Re: [Spam] Partcombine with rests

Rutger Hofman writes: > On 20-04-18 08:46, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: >> Folks, >> >> in the following example >> >> \version "2.19.80" >> >> One = \relative d'' { >>   R1 >>   r8 d4 e8 f4 >> } >> >> Two = \relative g' { >>   R1 >>   r4 e4 d2 >> } >> >> \new Staff

Re: [Spam] Partcombine with rests

On 20-04-18 08:46, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: Folks, in the following example \version "2.19.80" One = \relative d'' {   R1   r8 d4 e8 f4 } Two = \relative g' {   R1   r4 e4 d2 } \new Staff \partcombine \One \Two As the docs state, the decision about which partcombiner mode to choose

Re: {SPAM 02.4} Re: Repeating \markup commands

Am 08.04.2018 um 20:13 schrieb David Sumbler: \version "2.19.81" nar = ^\markup \whiteout \pad-markup #2 \etc Unfortunately the above produces "syntax error, unexpected \etc" The older version works fine. That’s because that’s a very recent change that hasn’t been released yet so “\version

Re: {SPAM 02.4} Re: Repeating \markup commands

David Sumbler writes: > On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 16:56 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> David Sumbler writes: >> >> > >> > The piece I am setting has a narrator.  For the score I have worked >> > out >> > a way of adding the narrator's short speeches over

Re: {SPAM 02.4} Re: Repeating \markup commands

On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 16:56 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > David Sumbler writes: > > > > > The piece I am setting has a narrator.  For the score I have worked > > out > > a way of adding the narrator's short speeches over the music which > > gives the appearance I want. > >

Re: [Spam] partcombine bug when using quoteDuring?

On 02/19/2018 08:09 PM, Nathan Sprangers wrote: When both voices in \partcombine finish a \quoteDuring at the same time, only one voice is rendered for subsequent notes. \version "2.18.2" \addQuote "melody" \relative c'' {   a4 a a a   d d d d } \addQuote "alto" \relative c'{   f2 f   g2

Re: [Spam] Re: How to move a note just a little

On 4-5-2017 23:29, Simon Albrecht wrote: Am 04.05.2017 um 22:20 schrieb Partitura Organum: I have linux running as an app on my tablet, That sounds great – how does one do that? Best, Simon I use an app called "Linux Deploy" for that. That app installs Linux and is later used to run the

Re: [Spam] Re: How to move a note just a little

Am 04.05.2017 um 22:20 schrieb Partitura Organum: I have linux running as an app on my tablet, That sounds great – how does one do that? Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: [Spam] Re: How to move a note just a little

On 4-5-2017 22:11, Rutger Hofman wrote: Just out of curiosity, what did you do to get lilypond running on Android? Rutger Hofman Amsterdam I cheated a bit: I have linux running as an app on my tablet, and I run Lilypond inside linux. That version of Linux only has 2.18.2 as a prepackaged

Re: [Spam] Re: How to move a note just a little

On 05/04/2017 10:01 PM, Partitura Organum wrote: [snip] However, I'd like a working solution for version 2.18.2. That's the only version I have working on my android tablet and I use both my desktop and my tablet for engraving. Thanks for the suggestion, anyway. Regards, Auke Just out of

Re: [Spam] Re: Multiple instruments in score and parts

On Sat, 2017-04-15 at 12:34 +0200, Rutger Hofman wrote: > On 04/13/2017 03:37 PM, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:19 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At the moment I cannot really see how to deal with this sort of > > > >

Re: [Spam] Re: Multiple instruments in score and parts

On 04/13/2017 03:37 PM, David Sumbler wrote: On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:19 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi David, At the moment I cannot really see how to deal with this sort of problem, other than having completely separate input for the score and the part at these points, controlled by

Re: [Spam] Re: Crescendo in the first beat misaligned to the others

Hello Son, I guess at your problem because I am not sure I grasp it. You are worried that the dynamics avoid the bar numbers from bar 2 on, is that right? Well, lilypond places the dynamics in a way that collisions are avoided, and the dynamics are treated independently of each other (with

Re: [Spam] Change beam grouping

On 03/03/2017 09:10 AM, Sven Axelsson wrote: Hi list. I asked this very question way back in 2011. Time to raise it again, maybe there is a way to do it now. The original thread is here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-09/msg00208.html This is probably in the manual, but

Re: {SPAM 01.0} Re: Changing the form of a whole-bar rest

On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 15:40 +, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message -  > From: "Simon Albrecht" > To: ; > Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 3:23 PM > Subject: Re: Changing the form of a whole-bar rest > > > > > >

Re: [Spam] request for help: huge score

Thomas Morley writes: > 2016-11-23 12:33 GMT+01:00 Rutger Hofman : >> You can check if my typeset of Berg's Adagio (Kammerkonzert) works. It is >> here: http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) then under the list >> of parts, there is a zip

Re: [Spam] request for help: huge score

2016-11-23 12:33 GMT+01:00 Rutger Hofman : > You can check if my typeset of Berg's Adagio (Kammerkonzert) works. It is > here: http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) then under the list > of parts, there is a zip with the source, with a Makefile to build score and > all

Re: [Spam] request for help: huge score

You can check if my typeset of Berg's Adagio (Kammerkonzert) works. It is here: http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) then under the list of parts, there is a zip with the source, with a Makefile to build score and all parts (make -j should work). (This is also a nice test if I

Re: [Spam] Photoscore

Somewhat more affordable is PDFToMusic Pro. It takes a PDF with music fonts (so not scans) and exports to MusicXML; it ought to be more reliable than the OMR that recognizes scans. It runs under Wine (at least the trial did). Rutger On 11/22/2016 11:13 AM, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: Hi List,

Re: [Spam] [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

2016-10-20 15:24 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan : > Hi David, > >>> accel, rit, a tempo, etc in a close >>> sequence, but obviously tied to their start times, and all at the same >>> vertical offset. For individual, more time-compressed, parts (e.g. the >>> woodwind

Re: [Spam] [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

Hi David, >> accel, rit, a tempo, etc in a close >> sequence, but obviously tied to their start times, and all at the same >> vertical offset. For individual, more time-compressed, parts (e.g. the >> woodwind parts that start out with rests!), I need to explicitly avoid >> the instructions

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

Rutger Hofman writes: > Even though I solved my problem: you asked above for my use-case, and > in this case it is the Adagio for solo violin and 13 winds from Alban > Berg's Kammerkonzert, see > http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) for the score. The > Adagio

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On 10/17/2016 06:49 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:35 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Rutger Hofman wrote: Thanks for all the help! First I post some rationale, then my real question, which is targeted

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

Rutger Hofman writes: > P.S. Building lilypond on my (up-to-date-ish but certainly not > killer-class) PC take some minutes, not those tens of hours that the > list spoke about lately. Do you want to volunteer for building our distributions and installers then? I suspect that

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:35 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Rutger Hofman wrote: >> Thanks for all the help! First I post some rationale, then my real question, >> which is targeted at the developers I guess. >> >> The

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:35 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Rutger Hofman wrote: >> Thanks for all the help! First I post some rationale, then my real question, >> which is targeted at the developers I guess. >> >> The

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Rutger Hofman wrote: > Thanks for all the help! First I post some rationale, then my real question, > which is targeted at the developers I guess. > > The behaviour I am after is a thing I really do want: it is visually > confusing if the 'a

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear whenpadded

- Original Message - From: "Rutger Hofman" <rut...@cs.vu.nl> To: "lilypond-user" <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:26 PM Subject: Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear whenpadded P.S. Buildin

Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

Thanks for all the help! First I post some rationale, then my real question, which is targeted at the developers I guess. The behaviour I am after is a thing I really do want: it is visually confusing if the 'a tempo' comes halfway the 'poco rit.)' when it is clearly meant to be after it. I

Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Rutger Hofman wrote: > On 10/12/2016 06:17 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, David Nalesnik >> wrote: >>> >>> Harm, >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Thomas Morley

Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Rutger Hofman wrote: > On 10/12/2016 03:53 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: >> That being said, the following adjusted definition of spanners should do >> it: >> >> spanners = { >> s2*7 | >> s4 >> \override

Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On 10/12/2016 06:17 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: Harm, On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: in this thread

Re: [Spam] Re: Spanner right-hand text may disappear when padded

On 10/12/2016 03:53 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: Harm, On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: in this thread

Re: [SPAM] Re: Multiple place number skip ranges

2016-05-07 21:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley : >>> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1036 > I'll let it unapproved for few more days in case somebody comes up > with further suggestions. > > Thanks a lot for review., > Harm Approved. Cheers, Harm

Re: [SPAM] Re: Multiple place number skip ranges

2016-05-07 15:17 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik : > Hi Harm, > > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Thomas Morley > wrote: >> 2016-05-07 10:53 GMT+02:00 Peter Gentry : >> >>> Could I sugeest that the range data is input in

Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Multiple place number skip ranges

[involving the group again] On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Peter Gentry wrote: > Yes I meant input the page number data as data to the procedure rather than > in the procedure it self > I think it's better to read the settings from the \paper variable as

Re: [SPAM] Re: Multiple place number skip ranges

Hi Harm, On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2016-05-07 10:53 GMT+02:00 Peter Gentry : > >> Could I sugeest that the range data is input in the individual music file >> rather than the procedure so that the procedure

Re: [SPAM] Re: Multiple place number skip ranges

2016-05-07 10:53 GMT+02:00 Peter Gentry : > Could I sugeest that the range data is input in the individual music file > rather than the procedure so that the procedure remains > unchanged for any arrangement of page ranges. It should be a minor addition > that

Re: Spam u don't like

I got five copies of the spam. Indeed every copy was last sent from MarcM ... On 04.03.2016 11:46, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: Hi Peter, It looks like MarcM's email has been haked. Pierre 2016-03-04 11:25 GMT+01:00 Peter Gentry

Re: Spam u don't like

Sorry everyone. i have an antivirus and i've changed my email password and i set anti-spoofing command on my domain. It looks like someone/something is using my contact list. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:44 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > "Peter Gentry"

Re: Spam u don't like

Hi Peter, It looks like MarcM's email has been haked. Pierre 2016-03-04 11:25 GMT+01:00 Peter Gentry : > How did potential malware links get into the list, it hasn't happend > before? If its not spam then the poster should be less cryptic or he won't > get anyone

Re: Spam u don't like

"Peter Gentry" writes: > How did potential malware links get into the list, it hasn't happend > before? If its not spam then the poster should be less cryptic > or he won't get anyone interested. Spam sent with a spoofed address from a list participant. The

Re: [SPAM] Re: Tweaking in scheme

Peter Gentry peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk writes: -Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] One can also try to do this kind of iteration oneself in order to only use the less invasive tweaks and get the color covered: \version 2.19.22 tweakIV =

Re: [SPAM] Re: Tweaking in scheme

David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: Peter Gentry peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk writes: -Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] One can also try to do this kind of iteration oneself in order to only use the less invasive tweaks and get the color covered: \version

RE: [SPAM] Re: Tweaking in scheme

-Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 12:40 PM To: Thomas Morley Cc: Peter Gentry; lilypond-user Subject: [SPAM] Re: Tweaking in scheme Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes: How about: \version 2.19.21 %% regard output

Re: [Spam] Re: hairpins default stop at barline

On 06/12/2015 02:23 PM, Gianmaria Lari wrote: I'm not a musician. I'm editing a published violin score using lilypond. The book is a set of studies by Robert Pracht and in many of them the note which ends a hairpin falls on a downbeat. I don't know if this is something exceptional or pretty

Re: [SPAM] Re: Best practice with inconsistent � 2

Am 07.08.2014 16:02, schrieb Urs Liska: Am 07.08.2014 15:08, schrieb Alex Loomis: In my copy of Dvorak 8 the parts use a2 for isolated unison passages and double stems for passages where the voices are also split at some point. Oh, I didn't think of that possibility. I'll check to see if it

Re: [SPAM] Re: See the new music fonts in action

Just one question before I can make a patch from this: which Lilypond version is this file derived from? (I need to know that in order not to discard any work others may have done in that file). Urs Urs On 1. August 2014 21:46:13 MESZ, Abraham Lee tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul

Re: [SPAM] Re: See the new music fonts in action

On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Just one question before I can make a patch from this: which Lilypond version is this file derived from? (I need to know that in order not to discard any work others may have done in that file). Urs I'm using 2.18.2.

Re: [SPAM] Re: See the new music fonts in action

Am 26.07.2014 19:52, schrieb Abraham Lee: Urs, I'm not familiar with Henle's font or the Universal Edition font (other than the one sample I've seen from you, attached). If you (or someone) could provide me with some example scores so I know what to look for, I could give it a go when I've got

Re: [SPAM] Re: See the new music fonts in action

On Jul 26, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 26.07.2014 19:52, schrieb Abraham Lee: P.P.S. You don't like Amadeus? I feel rejected :) Well, it's not that I don't like it, it feels like a good name for a notation font. But it's similarly unappropriate as

Re: [SPAM] Re: See the new music fonts in action

Would we dare call it Partita? This is a once-named font for Sibelius and Finale that looked like SCORE notation. AFAIK, it doesn't exist anymore. -Abraham On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Conor Cook conor.p.c...@gmail.com wrote: On Jul 26, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

Am 20.07.2014 11:10, schrieb Janek Warchoł: Hi folks, as you can see, i'm falling behind with lilypond stuff, but i wanted to let you know that i've skimmed through this discussion and it LGTM. The only comment i have is: try to make things as simple as possible (but not simpler, of course) - i

Re: [SPAM] Re: Question for all LilyPond users (especially power users)

Am 11.07.2014 09:20, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Am 11.07.2014 09:10, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: I think the cleanest way with the least hassles (and maybe discussion) would be to integrate into LilyPond the _possibility_

Re: [SPAM] Re: Question for all LilyPond users (especially power users)

Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Am 11.07.2014 09:20, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Am 11.07.2014 09:10, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: I think the cleanest way with the least hassles (and maybe discussion) would be to

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

Hi Urs and all, I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated according to the path they are stored in. Should we have a dedicated folder

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

Am 07.07.2014 11:37, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: Hi Urs and all, I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated according to the path they

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

Am 07.07.2014 11:46, schrieb Urs Liska: I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated according to the path they are stored in. Should

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

Am 07.07.2014 12:01, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: Am 07.07.2014 11:46, schrieb Urs Liska: I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

On 7. Juli 2014 16:48:44 MESZ, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote: Uns Liska wrote Hm, I think I _must not_ start with such a script right now, since I know that this - although being not too complex - will eat up too much of my time and concentration. But your message triggered a

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

Am 05.07.2014 10:31, schrieb Urs Liska: Thanks. I think we will have to reconsider our metadata section and then do the transfer in that reorganization branch. I strongly suggest to excusively do that using pull requests, even among the members with push access. One more thing I would suggest

Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

Uns Liska wrote I have updated the Wiki page https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/wiki and added a note about the reorganization process in the README.md on the restructuring branch. It's looking good to me. From the wiki page: Probably it's a good idea to assign a primary tag (=

Re: [SPAM] Re: openLilyLib snippets repository renamed

Am 28.06.2014 16:47, schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Hi Urs, 2014-06-28 16:41 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org: I'm not completely sure about forks. So if you have forked the snippets repository please check for yourself or get back to Janek or me directly so we can sort it out

Re: [SPAM] Re: Ignoring note clash

Am 11.06.2014 18:58, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Am 11.06.2014 16:56, schrieb Knute Snortum: This post is mostly for me to discover whether there's a better way to do what I'm doing. The following code produces the output I want, but it suppresses a warning:

Re: [SPAM] Re: LilyJAZZ in v2.18

Am 27.05.2014 22:32, schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: 2014-05-27 10:31 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org: But I'd still propose to include it in the snippets repository as soon as possible. Our repository is significantly different from LilyPond itself, and also from the official LSR.

Re: [SPAM] Re: LilyJAZZ in v2.18

2014-05-25 21:34 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org: What exactly do you mean? Dear Urs, When I started to make scores with LilyJAZZ few days ago it was, of course, with instruments I'm familiar with (guitar, bass, trumpet). And that helped me to find some enhancement. Now the purpose

  1   2   >