Re: Repeat volta puzzle

2014-02-01 Thread Jan-Peter Voigt
On 01.02.2014 15:37, David Kastrup wrote: > 2.19.0 captures the timing at the start of the first alternative and > restores it at the end of each alternative (issue 355 in the tracker). > Obviously, that's not a good idea at the end of the last alternative. > 2.19.1 fixes that (issue 3792 in the tr

Re: Repeat volta puzzle

2014-02-01 Thread David Kastrup
Jan-Peter Voigt writes: > Am 01.02.14 15:07, schrieb David Kastrup: >> Try upgrading LilyPond. Current versions get this right. You'll also >> need to remove the bar checks at the end of the alternatives as they are >> _not_ placed on a proper bar boundary. > do they? > If I compile this examp

Re: Repeat volta puzzle

2014-02-01 Thread Jan-Peter Voigt
Am 01.02.14 15:07, schrieb David Kastrup: Try upgrading LilyPond. Current versions get this right. You'll also need to remove the bar checks at the end of the alternatives as they are _not_ placed on a proper bar boundary. do they? If I compile this example with 2.18 (after using convert-ly),

Re: Repeat volta puzzle

2014-02-01 Thread bobr...@centrum.is
- Original Message - From: "ALAN ANDERSON" To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2014 1:33:12 PM Subject: Repeat volta puzzle Why does this segment go wrong in the second alternative? Is it to do with the "partial"? I've tried all sorts of

Re: Repeat volta puzzle

2014-02-01 Thread David Kastrup
ALAN ANDERSON writes: >  Why does this segment go wrong in the second alternative?   Is it to > do with the "partial"?   I've tried all sorts of things! > Alan > >    \version "2.16.2" > \header { poet = \markup { \huge "  " } >     composer = "  " > arranger = " "} >

Re: Repeat volta puzzle

2014-02-01 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: ALAN ANDERSON To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 1:33 PM Subject: Repeat volta puzzle Why does this segment go wrong in the second alternative? Is it to do with the "partial"? I've tried all sorts of things! Alan

Repeat volta puzzle

2014-02-01 Thread ALAN ANDERSON
 Why does this segment go wrong in the second alternative?   Is it to do with the "partial"?   I've tried all sorts of things! Alan    \version "2.16.2" \header { poet = \markup { \huge "  " }     composer = "  " arranger = " "} melody = \relative c' {   \clef treble