Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-24 Thread Ralph Palmer
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote: On 4/21/15 10:34 AM, SonusProj . sonusproject...@gmail.com wrote: I want to add below the chord, treble clef, the associated Roman numeral description of each chord. I.E. on the C Major I would have I, the Dm7 would

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-22 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Stephen, On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Stephen MacNeil classicalja...@gmail.com wrote: Harm , Thomas Morley and others I like to follow the discussions even if I don't understand/need something because I usually learn a lot and sometimes even adapt some ideas or code into something I

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-22 Thread Stephen MacNeil
Harm , Thomas Morley and others I like to follow the discussions even if I don't understand/need something because I usually learn a lot and sometimes even adapt some ideas or code into something I can use later. In this thread I was amazed that the scheme created could interpret the chords!!! I

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-22 Thread SonusProj .
Hi David. I am the OP. Looking at your example, you have a bit of code similar to another person who has assisted me. \markup \rN { I } I can't find documentation for the escape sequence and it throws and error when I try to compile. :14:11 0: error: unknown escaped string: `\rN' \markup

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-22 Thread Stephen MacNeil
Thanks David! That actual is very handy. to your point. If I'm understanding you correctly, you mean to be able to feed it, say, a Beethoven sonata and have it provide a Roman numeral analysis? Sorting out harmonic rhythm, embellishing tones, deciding on the current key, etc.?Now that would be a

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-22 Thread Stephen MacNeil
Thanks Harm, I do think it would be cool -- i must say i only played a bit with it and yes in little examples :) Apart from the most simple cases and only in c-major. ;) actually I got it to go in all keys :) a hack i do admit .. but it does the job. anyway that as I said would be a great

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-22 Thread SonusProj .
That is quite an example of taking my long hair code and making it efficient. It will take some reading for me to understand what all is happening here. Thanks for your assistance. Lance On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de wrote: Am 22.04.2015 um 04:29

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-22 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-04-22 19:24 GMT+02:00 Stephen MacNeil classicalja...@gmail.com: Harm , Thomas Morley and others I like to follow the discussions even if I don't understand/need something because I usually learn a lot and sometimes even adapt some ideas or code into something I can use later. In this

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-22 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-04-22 4:23 GMT+02:00 SonusProj . sonusproject...@gmail.com: That solution is also quite elegant. I need to spend some time understanding what you have created. Your chosen syntax is beyond my current understanding. Thanks for your input. Respectfully, Lance Well, you wrote:

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-22 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 22.04.2015 um 04:29 schrieb SonusProj .: Simon, I have several questions now that I have had a chance to review you code. 1) I wish to show the key for each staff line in lieu of showing all the accidentals relative to c. Is this possible with your current strategy? Sorry for overlooking

Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread SonusProj .
Attached (for ease of reading this post, code not embedded) is a simple project that has a staff for C Major and all Major flat keys. Above each 7th chord is the chord name. I want to add below the chord, treble clef, the associated Roman numeral description of each chord. I.E. on the C Major I

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread SonusProj .
Wow, thanks Stephen. That is wicked cool. You extended a great deal of help and I really appreciate it. I need some time to work through the alignment, markup, padding, etc that you have employed to get my head around it. As well, I need to find the definition of and other characters that are

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread SonusProj .
I changed the line: vii = ^\markup \concat{\italic {vii \lower #.5 \pad-around #.2 \combine \super\draw-line #'(.7 . .9)\super o super 7}} To vii = ^\markup \concat{\italic {vii \lower #.5 \pad-around #.2 \combine \super\draw-line #'(.7 . .9)\super o \super \lower #.5 7}} I lowered the last

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread Simon Albrecht
Hello, this becomes much less cumbersome by using \transpose. Also I’d suggest splitting it into individual scores. And there were some code style issues here also – I attach a much cleaner version (attaching is preferrable since nothing may be messed up on the way). HTH, Simon Am

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread Stephen MacNeil
I didn't do it just the markup but thanks anway stephen On Tuesday, April 21, 2015, Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de wrote: Hello, this becomes much less cumbersome by using \transpose. Also I’d suggest splitting it into individual scores. And there were some code style issues here also

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 4/21/15 10:34 AM, SonusProj . sonusproject...@gmail.com wrote: I want to add below the chord, treble clef, the associated Roman numeral description of each chord. I.E. on the C Major I would have I, the Dm7 would have ii7 with the 7 in superscript, the Em7 would have iii7 with the 7 in

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread SonusProj .
That solution is also quite elegant. I need to spend some time understanding what you have created. Your chosen syntax is beyond my current understanding. Thanks for your input. Respectfully, Lance On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-04-21

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread SonusProj .
Simon, I have several questions now that I have had a chance to review you code. 1) I wish to show the key for each staff line in lieu of showing all the accidentals relative to c. Is this possible with your current strategy? 2) If I wish to change the octave of either bass or treble clef on any

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread SonusProj .
thanks Carl. Lance On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote: On 4/21/15 10:34 AM, SonusProj . sonusproject...@gmail.com wrote: I want to add below the chord, treble clef, the associated Roman numeral description of each chord. I.E. on the C Major I would

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-04-21 19:34 GMT+02:00 SonusProj . sonusproject...@gmail.com: Attached (for ease of reading this post, code not embedded) is a simple project that has a staff for C Major and all Major flat keys. Above each 7th chord is the chord name. I want to add below the chord, treble clef, the

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread Simon Albrecht
Hi Harm, very impressive, but don’t you also think that it’s a little overkill to launch such big efforts on this small task? If it were on a larger scale, the automation would be more efficient, but with myself I observe that I tend to invest far more time into using as much automation as

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-04-22 1:32 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com: 2015-04-21 19:34 GMT+02:00 SonusProj . sonusproject...@gmail.com: Attached (for ease of reading this post, code not embedded) is a simple project that has a staff for C Major and all Major flat keys. Above each 7th chord is the

Re: Roman Numeral placement

2015-04-21 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-04-22 2:20 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de: Hi Harm, very impressive, but don’t you also think that it’s a little overkill to launch such big efforts on this small task? If it were on a larger scale, the automation would be more efficient, but with myself I observe that I