staff,
then if I changed it, then the autochanger would automatically apply the
manual change to the next note, and all consecutive notes thereafter which
was affected, until a note crossed the boundary again?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Strange-message-with-autochang
On 01.03.2010, at 06:03, George_ wrote:
I disagree. Once again citing my hypothetical 500-bar fugue, it seems
incomprehensible to me that there should not be a compromise
between the
autochange function and manual staff changes. It just blows my mind
that
something so feature-rich as Lilypon
re what other
information should
be put on, there's the rest of this thread, or just ask me if you
need more
info.
Thanks
George
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Strange-message-
with-autochange-tp27710824p27731384.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing
may
be useful in the short snippets that are in the docs, they are much less
practical for the long, multivoice pieces that many Lilypond users would
like to engrave.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Strange-message-with-autochange-tp27710824p27740196.html
Sent
;> }
>>> }
>>> >>
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>> \change Staff = "" doesn't seem to apply to rests, even when in
>> written
>> as b16\rest instead
On 28.02.2010, at 10:56, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
2010/2/28 James Bailey :
The only problem I have with this is that I don't think that manual
staff changes are supposed to work with autochange.
…
So, according to the doc, it should be possible to mix automatic and
manual staff changes.
Or thi
On 28.02.2010, at 10:56, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
2010/2/28 James Bailey :
The only problem I have with this is that I don't think that manual
staff changes are supposed to work with autochange.
…
So, according to the doc, it should be possible to mix automatic and
manual staff changes.
Or thi
2010/2/28 James Bailey :
> The only problem I have with this is that I don't think that manual
> staff changes are supposed to work with autochange.
That's what I thought too.
But with a further look at the doc one can see, under "Changing staff
automatically" (autochange):
If additional contr
seem to apply to rests, even when in
written
as b16\rest instead of just r16. I'm not sure what other
information should
be put on, there's the rest of this thread, or just ask me if you
need more
info.
Thanks
George
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Strange-mes
is thread, or just ask me if you need more
info.
Thanks
George
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Strange-message-with-autochange-tp27710824p27731384.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
port URL
listed at the very bottom:
http://post.gmane.org/post.php?group=gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.bugs
-Patrick
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabb
mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Strange-message-
with-autochange-tp27710824p27730746.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User m
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:32 PM, George_ wrote:
>
> Is there any particular format I need to conform to for bug reports, or do I
> just write 'freestyle'?
Yes, see this page for some hints:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/bug-reports
Thanks,
Patrick
__
an/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Strange-message-with-autochange-tp27710824p27730746.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 2010-02-27, George_ wrote:
>
> So where can I report this?
If you run LilyPond without arguments, you'll see the bug report URL
listed at the very bottom:
http://post.gmane.org/post.php?group=gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.bugs
-Patrick
___
lilypond-u
upid answer.
I'm sorry.
>Indeed, looks like a bug.
So where can I report this?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Strange-message-with-autochange-tp27710824p27729707.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 27 February 2010 06:09, George_ wrote:
> So say I have a piece that is five hundred bars long. Say I use
> autochange to get Lilypond to automatically change staff for the
> music. Say that there are 50 staff changes that are particularly
> awkward. You are telling me that the only alternative
the first part I need help
with). However, putting the \change in front of the rest gives the same
output as if the \change weren't there, and using x16\rest where x is a note
doesn't seem to put it in the right place either; for some reason Lilypond
skips right over most of the top sta
On 26 February 2010 20:46, George_ wrote:
> Hey, guys, could I please get some help for this? I really need to get this
> music transcribed for a competition in April, help would be greatly
> appreciated. Thanks!
Hi,
I don't understand what you are trying to achieve...
On 23 February 2010 22:
Hey, guys, could I please get some help for this? I really need to get this
music transcribed for a competition in April, help would be greatly
appreciated. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Strange-message-with-autochange-tp27710824p27722612.html
Sent from the Gnu
switch to
r16
\change Staff = "up" b e
g fis
What does this mean?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Strange-message-with-autochange-tp27710824p27711033.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mai
s happening is the
rest and b are on the lower staff, but I want them on the upper staff. Am I
going about this the right way? Some guidance would be appreciated!
Thanks
George
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Strange-message-with-autochange-tp27710824p27710824.html
Sent from the
22 matches
Mail list logo
