>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:46:29 +1000
> From: Andrew Bernard
> To: Urs Liska , lilypond-user@gnu.org, David
> Nalesnik
> Subject: Re: Tie engraver
>
> Hi Urs and David,
>
> Thanks so much. Yes, my chords are in voices so the slu
ot;2.19.18"
treble = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
\time 1/4
^\markup { A } ~ ~
<<
{
^\markup { B } ~ ~
}
\\
{
~ ~
}
>>
}
\score {
\new Staff { \treble }
\layout { }
}
From: Urs Liska
Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2015 22
~ ~
}
>>
}
\score {
\new Staff { \treble }
\layout { }
}
From: Urs Liska
Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2015 22:12
To: David Nalesnik, Andro
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Tie engraver
Am 28.04.2015 um 13:58 schrieb David Nalesnik:
Andrew,
On Tue, Apr 28,
ordingly. I was completely unaware of this aspect of
>> engraving. I had better study more scores and order that copy of Behind
>> Bars!
>>
>> But then the question becomes transformed - can you tell the tie engraver
>> for a voice to override its default behaviour, ev
I was completely unaware of this
aspect of engraving. I had better study more scores and order that
copy of Behind Bars!
But then the question becomes transformed - can you tell the tie
engraver for a voice to override its default behaviour, even
though that may be technically incorr
order that copy of Behind
> Bars!
>
> But then the question becomes transformed - can you tell the tie engraver
> for a voice to override its default behaviour, even though that may be
> technically incorrect? I have literally several hundred I need to tweak.
>
>
No easy way that
the tie engraver for a
voice to override its default behaviour, even though that may be technically
incorrect? I have literally several hundred I need to tweak.
Andrew
On 28 April 2015 at 14:55:12, Urs Liska (u...@openlilylib.org) wrote:
Am 28.04.2015 um 03:41 schrieb David Nalesnik:
Hi
Am 28.04.2015 um 03:41 schrieb David Nalesnik:
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Andrew Bernard
mailto:andrew.bern...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Greetings All,
The tie machinery for ties between chords puts them all one way,
up or down, when using a simple tilde for tying.
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> The tie machinery for ties between chords puts them all one way, up or
> down, when using a simple tilde for tying.
>
The following snippet has one upward tie and two downward ties.
{
~
}
If you use \vo
composer. I understand the tie
engraver can’t know what I want, but in the general case, is there any way you
can specify that for say, two note chords, the top tie goes up and the bottom
one goes down, and for three note chords, the top two go up and the bottom one
down, for four note chords the top
Please note that this problem (and the "solution" of moving the tie
engraver to the staff context) has been discussed several times before
on the mailing list, including the following threads:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-01/msg00359.html
http://lists.gnu.o
Wilbert Berendsen writes:
> Agreed. Even when explicitly instantiating voices it remains necessary to use
> them for e.g. cross-voice ties. Easy cross-voice ties would be very nice, as
> they occor very often in keyboard music. This is an example that works:
>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \
Op zondag 08 november 2009 schreef David:
> Hm. Maybe ties should work at the staff level as fall-back. Or even
> just explicitly. Wouldn't it be nice to be able to say ~~ and have the
> tie work staff-level? The current voice jigglery-pokery is not
> particularly nice, and it gets worse when
13 matches
Mail list logo
