Thanks. That gets the result I wanted.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 16 September 2008 23:36
To: Nick Payne
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Two questions about fingering indications
Hi Nick,
I saw that someone else answered
produces exactly what I understand you're looking
for - without writing any *!*!
hth
-Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Two-questions-about-fingering-indications-tp19507028p19512876.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailin
Hi Nick,
I saw that someone else answered the second question about the
b-naturals (just be sure to remove the ! from both voices).
Here's a quick fix for the right-hand fingering that will work for this
example, but it's kind of crude and not overly flexible. To position
individual fingeri
7; {
c4 c | % 1
b! b | % 2
d d | % 3
}
and it should work.
Kind regards,
Jan van Dijk.
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] namens Nick Payne
Verzonden: di 16-9-2008 14:51
Aan: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Onderwerp: RE: Two questions about fingering indications
Jon
Than
On 16.09.2008, at 14:51, Nick Payne wrote:
Jon
Thanks for the reply. However, I just removed the natural from the
2nd b in
bar 2 and I still get a natural appearing in the output on both b.
Bar 3 also contains two b naturals, so I added that bar with a
natural only
on the 1st b and only
Hi Nick,
I don't have time to investigate the fingerings at the moment, but I can
tell you quickly that the natural on the second b is there because you
specified it with the !. Any time you put the ! it forces lilypond to
show an accidental. Just take it out and you'll solve that problem.
I have the following code (it's the first couple of measures of Barrios'
prelude in C minor). Firstly, with the RH fingering, some of the indications
appear above the beam and some below, depending on where on the stave each
note is located. How can I get them to all be above the beam? Secondly, wi
