Hi,
> Op 2 sep. 2020, om 21:07 heeft David Kastrup het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> Maurits Lamers writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> convert-ly does text replacements. It is not a full parser. If text
>>> replacements are supposed to work, you need to write your text in a way
>>> that the replacement
David Kastrup writes:
> Maurits Lamers writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> convert-ly does text replacements. It is not a full parser. If text
>>> replacements are supposed to work, you need to write your text in a way
>>> that the replacement patterns cover. Stuff like putting # on one line
>>> and a co
Maurits Lamers writes:
> Hi,
>
>> convert-ly does text replacements. It is not a full parser. If text
>> replacements are supposed to work, you need to write your text in a way
>> that the replacement patterns cover. Stuff like putting # on one line
>> and a corresponding opening paren on the
Hi,
> convert-ly does text replacements. It is not a full parser. If text
> replacements are supposed to work, you need to write your text in a way
> that the replacement patterns cover. Stuff like putting # on one line
> and a corresponding opening paren on the next line are just too weird
> f
Maurits Lamers writes:
> Hi all,
>
> In order to have my braille generator not have to support Lilypond 2.14 I
> tried to upgrade my music library I am building this braille generator on.
>
> However, because of (a lot of) specific "hacks" on the layout, simply running
> convert-ly on the entir
Hi all,
In order to have my braille generator not have to support Lilypond 2.14 I tried
to upgrade my music library I am building this braille generator on.
However, because of (a lot of) specific "hacks" on the layout, simply running
convert-ly on the entire library doesn't completely finish t
, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re:drop down list (yming tsang)
2. Re:LilyPond and FontForge (fasola)
3. score wizard (wmil...@aol.com)
4. upgrading to 2.19.83-1 from 2.18.2 on Linux Mint (wm
Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2019-08-09 4:16 pm, Bill via lilypond-user wrote:
>> Oh well I tried
>> i downloaded
>>
>> lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh
>> from this
>> GNU/Linux 64: LilyPond 2.19.83-1
>> buttonat
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/development.html
>> I tried to upgrade using Synaptic package M
On 2019-08-09 4:16 pm, Bill via lilypond-user wrote:
Oh well I tried
i downloaded
lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh
from this
GNU/Linux 64: LilyPond 2.19.83-1
buttonat
http://lilypond.org/development.html
I tried to upgrade using Synaptic package Manager but that only showed
2.18.2 which i have i
Oh well I tried
i downloaded
lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh
from this
GNU/Linux 64: LilyPond 2.19.83-1
buttonat
http://lilypond.org/development.html
I tried to upgrade using Synaptic package Manager but that only showed 2.18.2
which i have installed.
So, I read up on sh files and got this fa
I would try going to the command line and typing "where lilypond". This
will tell you all the places LilyPond is installed.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Contreras
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I'm installing Lily Pond on my Windows machine now. Well trying to
Hello everyone,
I'm installing Lily Pond on my Windows machine now. Well trying to. I have an
old version 2.12 installed here, I uninstalled it and try to install the latest
stable release. However when I finish installation and run the example file,
diversion statement says 2.12. Is there somet
On 22 April 2014 09:06, Marcin Gryszkalis wrote:
>
> On 20.04.2014 23:02, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> > https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/master/notation-snippets/adjust-horizontal-spacing
>
> That's it, worked like a charm :) I thought one can only use 1/(2^n) as
> moment... Thanks
>
> rega
On 20.04.2014 23:02, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/master/notation-snippets/adjust-horizontal-spacing
That's it, worked like a charm :) I thought one can only use 1/(2^n) as
moment... Thanks
regards
--
Marcin Gryszkalis, PGP 0xA5DBEEC7
jabber jid:m...@fork.p
- Original Message -
From: "Marcin Gryszkalis"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Karol Majewski"
Cc: "lilypond-user mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: too wide score after upgrading 2.18.1 to 2.18.2
On 20.04.2014 12:56, Phil
2014-04-20 19:55 GMT+02:00 Marcin Gryszkalis :
> On 20.04.2014 12:34, Karol Majewski wrote:
>> There was this big spacing issue 3304, which was fixed between 2.18.1 and
>> 2.18.2. https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3304
>> I think this could be the reason.
>
> It looks to be tuplet
On 20.04.2014 12:56, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Also, simply deleting all the forced line breaks fits the piece on one
> page!
That's right - though I wanted to have line break every 4th bar (as you can
see on 2.18.1 sample).
> 2.18.1 was never actually released: how did you get it?
Gentoo linux port
- Original Message -
From: "Karol Majewski"
To: "Marcin Gryszkalis"
Cc: "lilypond-user mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 11:34 AM
Subject: Odp: too wide score after upgrading 2.18.1 to 2.18.2
Hi Marcin.
There was this big spacing issue 3304,
Hi Marcin.
There was this big spacing issue 3304, which was fixed between 2.18.1 and
2.18.2.
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3304
I think this could be the reason.
--Karol
> Hi
> After upgrading to 2.18.2 I noticed that scores are engraved with more
> space,
- Original Message -
From: "Marcin Gryszkalis"
To: "lilypond-user mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 11:21 AM
Subject: too wide score after upgrading 2.18.1 to 2.18.2
Hi
After upgrading to 2.18.2 I noticed that scores are engraved with more
space,
caus
Hi
After upgrading to 2.18.2 I noticed that scores are engraved with more space,
causing different splits (and in one particular example my son was working on
- I cannot fit it on one page anymore).
You can see example:
http://stuff.fork.pl/rondo-2-18-1.pdf
http://stuff.fork.pl/rondo-2-18-2.pdf
le in the proposed form but that does not mean
> > we should ignore it.
>
> Forwarded to bug-lilypond. Bug Squad, please look at "A documentation
> suggestion, was: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading
> to the new stable version" thread on -user.
d ignore it.
Forwarded to bug-lilypond. Bug Squad, please look at "A documentation
suggestion, was: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading
to the new stable version" thread on -user.
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
li
Janek Warchoł writes:
>> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 3:05 PM, james wrote:
>>> Perhaps there is a much simpler solution. Notation reference, 1.3.1
>>> is where I got the example which I have been using since at least
>>> 2.12, because centering such a new dynamic is probably rarer than
>>> having it
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Kevin Patrick Barry wrote:
> Dear LilyPond users,
>
> I have found the recent debate about the difficulty of using LilyPond
> interesting and would like to offer my experience, as someone who has
> been using it for about six months. I apologise if this is a bit
>
+1 for updating documentation.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 3:05 PM, james wrote:
> Perhaps there is a much simpler solution. Notation reference, 1.3.1 is where
> I got the example which I have been using since at least 2.12, because
> centering such a new dynamic is probably rarer than having it l
Dear LilyPond users,
I have found the recent debate about the difficulty of using LilyPond
interesting and would like to offer my experience, as someone who has
been using it for about six months. I apologise if this is a bit
long.
For the most part I use LilyPond to do musical examples, for the
Am 27.10.2012 14:13, schrieb David Kastrup:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> Well, as a matter of fact, LilyPond uses Scheme to extend its
>> functionality. This won't change.
It is a very unintuitive language to me. But I fear I have to live with
it, when dealing with LilyPond in a bit more detail.
26.10.2012 00:52, David Kastrup:
> … 2.17.6 will make a lot of #'xxx and #'(xxx yyy) unnecessary.
> … Something like Score.Accidental, previously an
> isolated LilyPond syntax element, now has a straightforward and direct
> correspondence to Scheme data structures.
>
> Being able to map LilyPond s
james writes:
>> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>
>>> So I ask again: What exactly are the difficulties you have
>>> encountered? What concepts are badly explained, what examples are
>>> `greek' to you, and why? Simply skipping the Scheme code and asking
>>> for a non-Scheme solution isn't helpful e
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
>> So I ask again: What exactly are the difficulties you have
>> encountered? What concepts are badly explained, what examples are
>> `greek' to you, and why? Simply skipping the Scheme code and asking
>> for a non-Scheme solution isn't helpful either.
Perhaps there
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> LilyPond is supposed to
> be useful without having to extend it.
>
>> In other words, an a-priori refusal of Scheme isn't helpful if you
>> want to explore the capabilities of LilyPond.
>
> If you want to _extend_ them. LilyPond is nowhere n
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 4:20 AM, james wrote:
[...]
> here's an example
> where the answer to my question was a bit above my level of understanding.
> Granted, the question was a bit above my level of understanding…
>
I'm sorry, but I'm having a difficult time understanding your point.
You aske
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>> Maybe examples can be extended and/or reduced to make them easier
>>> to comprehend.
>>
>> It's not the examples in the documentation, or at least, I
>> understand all of the documentation except for the introduction to
>> scheme, which is fine for me, since I don't use
>> Maybe examples can be extended and/or reduced to make them easier
>> to comprehend.
>
> It's not the examples in the documentation, or at least, I
> understand all of the documentation except for the introduction to
> scheme, which is fine for me, since I don't use scheme.
Well, as a matter of
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:07 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> At any rate, in LilyPond 2.16 you _can_ write the above as
> rinforzamf =
> #(make-dynamic-script
> #{ \markup \line { \left-align \normal-text \whiteout \italic "rinforza"
> \hspace #0
> \whiteout
james writes:
> On Oct 26, 2012, at 8:15 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> It would be very helpful to us if you can find some time to *exactly*
>> point out what background knowledge you are missing.
>
> Knowing what you don't know is always difficult. However, here's an
> example where the answer
On Oct 26, 2012, at 8:15 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> It would be very helpful to us if you can find some time to *exactly*
> point out what background knowledge you are missing.
Knowing what you don't know is always difficult. However, here's an example
where the answer to my question was a bi
Thomas Morley writes:
> I think some intimidation could be present, but how to do it different?
>
> Not answering?
>
> Or (back to the draw-dashed-line) demonstrating how to do it with:
> drawing a small line
> some padding
> drawing a small line with appropriate offset
> some padding
> drawing a
2012/10/26 David Nalesnik :
> Hi James,
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, james wrote:
>
>>
>> My main issue is that when I don't understand how to do something, while
>> there might be a way to do it that I could understand, because the "power
>> users" are the ones that more often than not
Harm,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
[...]
> Hi David (N),
>
> I think the draw-dashed-line-command is worth putting into the source.
> If you agree, I will turn it into a patch the next days.
Unbelievable. You must have sent this when I was writing the same
thing in th
2012/10/26 David Nalesnik :
> David,
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> David Nalesnik writes:
>>
>>> However, there are often questions that can't be answered in any way
>>> but to delve into Scheme. As recently, for example, when a question
>>> was posed about using \
David,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Nalesnik writes:
>
>> However, there are often questions that can't be answered in any way
>> but to delve into Scheme. As recently, for example, when a question
>> was posed about using \draw-line to make a dashed line instea
David Nalesnik writes:
> However, there are often questions that can't be answered in any way
> but to delve into Scheme. As recently, for example, when a question
> was posed about using \draw-line to make a dashed line instead of a
> solid one. AFAIK, there's no simple way to do it which you
Hi James,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, james wrote:
>
> My main issue is that when I don't understand how to do something, while
> there might be a way to do it that I could understand, because the "power
> users" are the ones that more often than not respond, I'm left with an answer
> th
> I re-read the learning manual when a major stable version is
> released, just to become familiar with any major changes. I know how
> to search the notation reference for the contexts or engravers I
> might want to modify, and what modifications I can make to them,
> because these kinds of chang
On Oct 26, 2012, at 7:11 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> james writes:
>
>> On Oct 25, 2012, at 11:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> …
>>> What you are witnessing on the user list is the
>>> emergence of "power users", a class of users narrowing the gap between
>>> users and core developers. Yes, the
james writes:
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 11:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> …
>> What you are witnessing on the user list is the
>> emergence of "power users", a class of users narrowing the gap between
>> users and core developers. Yes, they juggle with complex material. But
>> that does not mean t
On Oct 25, 2012, at 11:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> …
> What you are witnessing on the user list is the
> emergence of "power users", a class of users narrowing the gap between
> users and core developers. Yes, they juggle with complex material. But
> that does not mean that things have actual
Jay,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Jay Hamilton wrote:
> Janek-
> I'm not going to do that [upgrade to 2.16]. Here's a few reasons why.
> I've been using lilypond since some kind of 1 version. Some of the
> stable versions have been baby steps and easy to accommodate and understand.
> M
2012/10/25 David Kastrup :
> Jay Hamilton writes:
>
>> Janek-
>> I'm not going to do that. Here's a few reasons why.
>
> Well, obviously I am rather partial here, but I quite disagree with your
> assessment here. What you are witnessing on the user list is the
> emergence of "power users", a clas
Eluze writes:
> Am 26.10.2012 00:52, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> With "2.16.0" you could use:
>>>
>>> \tweak Accidental #'font-size #-2
>> The way it looks, with 2.17.6 you will likely have to write
>>
>> \tweak Accidental.font-size #-2
>>
>> indeed, an incompatible sy
Am 26.10.2012 00:52, schrieb David Kastrup:
Thomas Morley writes:
With "2.16.0" you could use:
\tweak Accidental #'font-size #-2
The way it looks, with 2.17.6 you will likely have to write
\tweak Accidental.font-size #-2
indeed, an incompatible syntax change. convert-ly will cover it,
th
Thomas Morley writes:
> With "2.16.0" you could use:
>
> \tweak Accidental #'font-size #-2
The way it looks, with 2.17.6 you will likely have to write
\tweak Accidental.font-size #-2
indeed, an incompatible syntax change. convert-ly will cover it,
though. 2.17.6 will make a lot of #'xxx and
;s just changed.
I disagree again. LilyPond *is* becoming a *much* better programm for users.
It becomes easier and easier to use.
Sometimes I'm afraid that the gap between the knowledge of a
medium-level-user and a core developer will raise to an amount that
will make it more difficult for that m
a better piece of software from this user's perspective. And
> hasn't been in the last few iterations, it's just changed.
The typesetting has improved much (lots of collision and spacing issues
have been tackled), and _lots_ of documents will just convert cleanly
with convert-ly to the rat
Janek-
I'm not going to do that. Here's a few reasons why.
I've been using lilypond since some kind of 1 version. Some of the
stable versions have been baby steps and easy to accommodate and
understand. Many many of the changes that have been taking place in V2
have not been like that. It t
On 11.11.2009, at 12:13, Gerard McConnell wrote:
Hi, Perhaps a stupid question - is there any reason NOT to
upgrade from 2.12.x to 2.13.7?
Thanks,
Gerard
I tend to work from the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" principle.
So, unless there's something fundamentally broken that you absolu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 12:13:49 schrieb Gerard McConnell:
> Hi,
> Perhaps a stupid question - is there any reason NOT to
> upgrade from 2.12.x to 2.13.7?
If you are adjusting the vertical layout (staff spacing, padding etc.), then
things wi
2009/11/11 Gerard McConnell :
> Hi, Perhaps a stupid question - is there any reason NOT to
> upgrade from 2.12.x to 2.13.7?
Possibly. 2.13.7 could have changes in syntax, or experimental
features. It worths it if you want to help testing it.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
ww
Hi,
Perhaps a stupid question - is there any reason NOT to
upgrade from 2.12.x to 2.13.7?
Thanks,
Gerard
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi -
I'm running LilyPond 2.12.2 under Ubuntu 9.10. I have a .ly file I've been
writing/editing for a while using 2.12.2 under Ubuntu 9.9 (I think - Jaunty
Jackalope). I upgraded yesterday, and found I needed to reinstall LilyPond.
The package that came with Ubuntu 9.10 was, if fact, 2.12.2, so I
2008/11/16 chip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks Jon, got the 'older' version uninstalled the and new version
> installed and made a new entry to my path so it will run from the command
> line.
I recommend new Linux users to install as root, being the reason that
it is fully automatic. As normal user
e document only mentions 'upgrade' in
relationship to convert-ly, not upgrading lilypond. Oh, I am using
lilypond on a linux (ubuntu) box.
Thanks
--
Chip
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li
I just download
and extract the latest version over the top of the existing version? The
Application Usage document only mentions 'upgrade' in relationship to
convert-ly, not upgrading lilypond. Oh, I am using lilypond on a linux
(ubuntu) box.
Than
o
convert-ly, not upgrading lilypond. Oh, I am using lilypond on a linux
(ubuntu) box.
Thanks
--
Chip
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi list,
after upgrading from 2.11.35 to 2.11.43-2, my call to lilypond-book does
not work anymore.
I used to call lilypond-book the following way:
lilypond-book --pdf --include=BookIn --include=. --output=BookOut
SongBook.tex
and it always worked fine, but after the upgrade, I get the
After upgrading my Ubuntu Linux I get the following message (lilypond
2.10.25):
##
lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.10.25
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/lilypond-book", line 1879, in
main ()
File "/usr/bin/lilypond-book", line 1845, in main
The latest stable version is 2.8.7. To upgrade, just uninstall your
current version and
install the new one. Utilities like midi2ly in 2.8.7 should work well on
Windows XP,
but if you want to use lilypond-book, you should rather try the latest
development
version 2.9.22 or wait for 2.10 which s
Hi,
I run Windows XP, and I haven't upgraded since v.2.6.5. Is there n easy
way to upgrade, or should I wait for 2.10 to come out? I don't really
stretch LP's capabilities, but I've been unable to use most utilities
because of a problem in the Python distribution included.
Just Wondering,-- ～Ben （現
After upgrading from 2.6.1 to Lilypond 8.1 I get the following error messages
if I use lilypond-book:
###
dvips -h main.psfonts main.dvi
This is dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2006.04.27:1006' -> main.ps
dvips: Font Aybabtu
Hello,
my current version of LilyPond is 2.8.1-1. I've found a new minor
upgrade. When I tried to install it, the installer said it found
previous version of LilyPond and said a had had to uninstall it first.
Why is it bothering me with it and just doesn't ask: "Previous version
of LilyPond f
Here's how to get Lilypond 2.8.1 installed from source in Gentoo... it
isn't hard. This includes installing a patched version of Ghostscript
8.53 (which under Gentoo supports the hl1250 printer driver in addition
to the standard drivers).
1. make sure PORTDIR_OVERLAY is declared in /etc/make.
Title: Upgrading from 2.6 to 2.8
Hello, all.
I post this with the hopes that it will prove helpful to someone.
I run on a Gentoo Linux system (thanks to whoever picked up the maintenance for the lilypond ebuild! When will I see 2.8.1, btw?) and ran into a simple issue that took a while to
Excellent, thanks that works!
Tim.
On Monday 14 Nov 2005 01:04, Graham Percival wrote:
> On 13-Nov-05, at 2:16 PM, Tim Sawyer wrote:
> > Thanks! That now gets me a dvi I can preview. Unfortunately, it has
> > font
> > trouble - I appear to be missing note heads and the time sig is in
> > the w
You have already received an answer, but why not take a quick look in
the manual corresponding to your version before sending the question to
the mailing list?
/Mats
Tim Sawyer wrote:
Thanks! That now gets me a dvi I can preview. Unfortunately, it has font
trouble - I appear to be missing
On 13-Nov-05, at 2:16 PM, Tim Sawyer wrote:
Thanks! That now gets me a dvi I can preview. Unfortunately, it has
font
trouble - I appear to be missing note heads and the time sig is in
the wrong
font.
If I do a "dvipdf volume2.dvi" it gives the following output:
Try this:
dvips -h $1.psf
Thanks! That now gets me a dvi I can preview. Unfortunately, it has font
trouble - I appear to be missing note heads and the time sig is in the wrong
font.
If I do a "dvipdf volume2.dvi" it gives the following output:
dvips: Font PFAEmmentaler-20 used in file lily-109005405-1.eps is not in t
On 13-Nov-05, at 12:12 PM, Tim Sawyer wrote:
! Undefined control sequence.
l.1 \includegraphics
{lily-109005405-1.eps}
?
I believe that in 2.6, you need to add
\usepackage{graphics}
to your lilypond-book file.
Cheers,
- Graham
_
Cheers for that.
Next problem - my music now goes through lilypond book successfully, but I
don't seem to be able to process the output.
I have a script that does:
rm -r build
mkdir build
cp volume2.tex ./build
cd build
lilypond-book -V --psfonts -o output volume2.tex
cd output
latex volume2.te
Tim Sawyer wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade from 2.0 to 2.6, and I'm having trouble.
Anyone any ideas? convert-ly seems to output it the same as it went in.
Check out the manual section on drum notation. There have been some
syntax changes.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://
I'm trying to upgrade from 2.0 to 2.6, and I'm having trouble.
This fragment, passed to lilypond-book:
\begin[staffsize=20]{lilypond}
\version "2.6.0"
up = { \repeat "percent" 3 { hh8 hh8 << hh8 sn8 >> hh8 hh8 hh8 << hh8 sn8 >>
hh8 } hh8 hh8 << hh8 sn8 >> hh8 sn8 sn8 sn8 sn8 \bar "|." }
down =
> "MB" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MB> What operating system do you use?
MB> Does the command create any files at all in the directory out/ ?
There was a lilypond-book bug in 2.6.3. Someone claimed it was fixed
in cvs 15 minutes after the release. It's on my list t
What operating system do you use?
Does the command create any files at all in the directory out/ ?
/Mats
Wolfgang Mechsner wrote:
I am sorry, but after upgrading Lilypond always I get a new problem with
lilypond-book.
The newest one (2.6.3.1.):
###
lilypond-book --psfon ts
I am sorry, but after upgrading Lilypond always I get a new problem with
lilypond-book.
The newest one (2.6.3.1.):
###
lilypond-book --psfon ts -o out harmonielehre.lytex
lilypond-book-bin-2.6.3.1 (GNU LilyPond) 2.6.3.1
harmonielehre.lytex lesen...
Zerlegen...
Schreibe AuszÃŒge
The bug has already been reported to the lilypond-bug
mailing list and waiting for that, you can get rid of the problem by
doing
unset LANG
or
export LANG=en_US
which gives the default English warning and error messages but should
solve your problem.
/Mats
Wolfgang Mechsner wrote:
Hi,
after upgra
u can get rid of the problem by
> >>doing
> >>unset LANG
> >>or
> >>export LANG=en_US
> >>which gives the default English warning and error messages but should
> >>solve your problem.
> >>
> >>/Mats
> >>
> >>W
fgang Mechsner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after upgrading to 2.6.3. (2.6.0 worked fine) I have a problem with
> > lilypond-book.
> >
> > After
> >
> > lilypond-book -o out test.lytex
> >
> > I get this:
> > ###
&
error messages but should
solve your problem.
/Mats
Wolfgang Mechsner wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to 2.6.3. (2.6.0 worked fine) I have a problem with
lilypond-book.
After
lilypond-book -o out test.lytex
I get this:
###
..
Layout nach »lily-244139305-1.eps« ausgeben
Hi,
after upgrading to 2.6.3. (2.6.0 worked fine) I have a problem with
lilypond-book.
After
lilypond-book -o out test.lytex
I get this:
###
..
Layout nach »lily-244139305-1.eps« ausgeben...
Layout nach »lily-244139305.eps« ausgeben...
test.tex kompilieren...
Schreibe
NG
or
export LANG=en_US
which gives the default English warning and error messages but should
solve your problem.
/Mats
Wolfgang Mechsner wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to 2.6.3. (2.6.0 worked fine) I have a problem with
lilypond-book.
After
lilypond-book -o out test.lytex
I get
If you look through the mailing list archives for the the lilypond-user,
lilypond-devel and bug-lilypond mailing lists over the last week or so,
you will see that there are some problems with Windows ME that hopefully
are being in the process of being solved right now.
/Mats
Sacha Standen wro
Hello
I've downloaded
version 2.5.29-2 for Windows, but can't run the program. I'm using Windows ME.
I've uninstalled the old version (2.4.3) through Cygwin setup and then installed
2.5.29 and now have an icon on the desktop (marked ly and entitled lilypond)
which didn't exist with the old
Please keep lilypond traffic on the mailist; the answers can help other
people. In
addition, other people can help where I can't. :)
I don't know how the window package works, but I'm sure somebody else
can
tell you. What version of windows do you have? If there is a bug,
we'll need
to kn
On 11-Jun-05, at 6:04 AM, Sacha Standen wrote:
I've just downloaded an upgrade of version 2.5.29 for windows (from
2.4.3), but can't install it properly; the Cygwin setup only gives me
the option to uninstall, keep or reinstall version 2.4.3. I've
re-downloaded the setup programme, uninstalled
Hello
I've just downloaded an upgrade of version 2.5.29
for windows (from 2.4.3), but can't install it properly; the Cygwin setup only
gives me the option to uninstall, keep or reinstall version 2.4.3. I've
re-downloaded the setup programme, uninstalled LilyPond and tried to reinstall,
but
> "JN" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JN> Laura Conrad writes:
>> I use it. It isn't possible for me to switch to 2.4 (or 2.5 in its
>> current state) because abc2ly is broken in a major way. (It
>> fails to translate key signatures.)
JN> Can we please
Laura Conrad writes:
> I use it. It isn't possible for me to switch to 2.4 (or 2.5 in its
> current state) because abc2ly is broken in a major way. (It
> fails to translate key signatures.)
Can we please have a proper bug report? We do not want to ship known
to be broken software.
Jan.
--
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 17.06, Laura Conrad wrote:
> > "MB" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MB> I really recommend you to upgrade to the latest stable version
> 2.4.x MB> as soon as possible, since it has improved significantly compared
> to MB> 2.0. Also, since almost
> "MB" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MB> I really recommend you to upgrade to the latest stable version 2.4.x
MB> as soon as possible, since it has improved significantly compared to
MB> 2.0. Also, since almost nobody on the mailing list uses 2.0, it will
MB> be
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
