Paul Morris writes:
> dak wrote
>> Yes. For things like stem directions, there may be a default callback
>> which makes the decision about whether to put the stem upwards or
>> downwards, and calling this fallback might trigger other typesetting
>> decisions prematurely. Also, one does not get
data works for a given
case, then it's the safer choice of the two. Thanks for the explanation.
-Paul Morris
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Vertical-position-of-rests-on-a-custom-staff-tp146537p146669.html
Sent from the User ma
Paul Morris writes:
> "To conclude the saga..." Thanks to David Kastrup's tip my function
> can now automatically position all rests and their dots where they
> need to be, no matter what voice they are in. Once again LilyPond can
> handle just about anything. See attached file.
>
> I'm now cu
"To conclude the saga..." Thanks to David Kastrup's tip my function can now
automatically position all rests and their dots where they need to be, no
matter what voice they are in. Once again LilyPond can handle just about
anything. See attached file.
I'm now curious about the difference bet
> > The only ones that needed re-positioning were the rarer ones
> > that were longer than a whole rest. Also the dots on about half of
> > the rests also still needed re-positioning.
>
> Could you elaborate?
See the attached files. This one makes it clearer than the previous one. The
red res
hank you! This will do the trick.
-Paul Morris
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Vertical-position-of-rests-on-a-custom-staff-tp146537p146634.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lil
Paul Morris writes:
> After getting that working I checked to see if anything changed
> between v. 2.16 to 2.17.19 And I'm really glad to say that in 2.17.19
> the positioning of the rests was almost exactly what I wanted by
> default! The only ones that needed re-positioning were the rarer ones
Paul Morris writes:
> I am working on adjusting the vertical position of rests on a custom
> staff and have run into a problem. I basically want the rests to be
> positioned as they are on the standard staff, but in my custom staff
> there is no center line so the rests become ori
Hi Pierre, I tried your suggestion:
> restmusic = \relative f {
> \override Rest #'Y-offset = #0
> \cadenzaOn
> ...
> }
But it put the whole and half rests on a ledger line in the middle of the
custom staff, which was not really what I wanted.
I tried to figure out a way to globally
2013/6/1 Paul Morris
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am working on adjusting the vertical position of rests on a custom staff
> and have run into a problem. I basically want the rests to be positioned
> as they are on the standard staff, but in my custom staff there is no
> center
Hello everyone,
I am working on adjusting the vertical position of rests on a custom staff and
have run into a problem. I basically want the rests to be positioned as they
are on the standard staff, but in my custom staff there is no center line so
the rests become oriented to the next line
11 matches
Mail list logo
