> > IMHO, there are definitely valid situations where
> > automatic beaming over rests does make sense.
>
> this would not be hard to get done. Here’s an experimental commit:
> [...]
Veeery nice, thanks! I only wonder what situation you envision to add
a special property for skips...
Werner
Hi Werner,
Am 29.01.23 um 11:30 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
IMHO, there are definitely valid situations where
automatic beaming over rests does make sense.
this would not be hard to get done. Here’s an experimental commit:
[...]
Veeery nice, thanks! I only wonder what situation you envision to ad
>> Veeery nice, thanks! I only wonder what situation you envision to
>> add a special property for skips...
>
> \version "2.24.0"
>
> \new Staff \relative
> <<
> { c'8[ s s c] }
> \\
> { s c c s }
>>>
>
> doesn't seem unreasonable to me (for example in piano music).
OK, thanks.
Wer
r d]
>> ```
>>
>> I now wonder whether it makes sense to control this behaviour with
>> a property, and whether this behaviour (i.e., autobeaming over
>> rests) can be easily implemented at all...
>
> Depending on how regular this actually is, you might be able to do
that autobeaming doesn't work over rests. In some
> >> situations this means a lot of additional work. As an example,
> >> consider a piece that uses almost exclusively a saltarello-like
> >> rhythm:
> >>
> >>
> >>
&
At 10:27 on 29 Jan 2023, Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hello Werner,
> this would not be hard to get done. Here’s an experimental commit:
> https://gitlab.com/vpetzel/lilypond/-/commit/5267b574d27316b7c5d45080b32200dabc5d37dc[1]
> Using this test:
> {
> c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'
Valentin Petzel writes:
> Hello Werner,
>
> I felt it a bit inconsistent to make rests optionally auto beamable
> and to leave skips untouched ...
Beaming over skips seems like it would produce incomprehensible results.
--
David Kastrup
Hello David,
in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in say piano
music where something like this would make sense.
Valentin
Am Sonntag, 29. Jänner 2023, 15:37:23 CET schrieb David Kastrup:
> Beaming over skips seems like it would produce incomprehensible results.
s
Valentin Petzel writes:
> Hello David,
>
> in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in
> say piano music where something like this would make sense.
I'd say that proportion seems low enough that providing automatisms for
it is more likely to cause confusion than help.
-
Am 29.01.23 um 17:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
Valentin Petzel writes:
Hello David,
in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in
say piano music where something like this would make sense.
I'd say that proportion seems low enough that providing automatisms for
it is mor
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Am 29.01.23 um 17:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Valentin Petzel writes:
>>
>>> Hello David,
>>>
>>> in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in
>>> say piano music where something like this would make sense.
>> I'd say that proportion seems lo
Am 29.01.23 um 17:36 schrieb Valentin Petzel:
Hello David,
in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in say piano
music where something like this would make sense.
Additionally, Schenker graphs would be an obvious example where beaming
over skips is useful. (But of c
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Am 29.01.23 um 17:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Valentin Petzel writes:
>>
>>> Hello David,
>>>
>>> in most cases definitely, but I suppose there might be some cases in
>>> say piano music where something like this would make sense.
>> I'd say that proportion seems lo
> The lower voice could not possibly be autobeamed anyway since it starts
> behind the beat. You need to add all of the skips manually, and I don't
> think that adding the single beam you want would be enough effort to
> warrant autobeaming.
Why would this be so? Lilypond does not have issues aut
Valentin Petzel writes:
>> The lower voice could not possibly be autobeamed anyway since it starts
>> behind the beat. You need to add all of the skips manually, and I don't
>> think that adding the single beam you want would be enough effort to
>> warrant autobeaming.
>
> Why would this be so?
On 2023-01-29 18:19, Lukas-Fabian Moser
wrote:
Am 29.01.23 um 17:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
Valentin Petzel
writes:
Hello David,
in most cases definitely, but I suppose t
this behaviour with a
property, and whether this behaviour (i.e., autobeaming over rests)
can be easily implemented at all...
Werner
onder whether it makes sense to control this behaviour with a
property, and whether this behaviour (i.e., autobeaming over rests)
can be easily implemented at all...
Depending on how regular this actually is, you might be able to do
something like
\version "2.24.0"
\new Voice <&l
18 matches
Mail list logo