sion: 1.0
To: Kieren Richard MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dynamics: integrated or separate variable?
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7
Hello, Rick:
I try to keep as much as possible OUT of the notes list
Me, too! I've been thinking of using the new \parallelMusic feature
as a replacement mechanism, e.g.,
%% CODE BEGINS
\parallelMusic #'(notes dynamics)
{
g'4 g' g' g' |
s1\f |
g'4 g' g' g'
I try to keep as much as possible OUT of the notes list, I wish everything
could be targeted to the notes by some external targeting fashion instead of
embedding. It keeps my songs more maintainable, I think, and easier to
re-use my templates for new songs. I'm a newer user but I think LilyPond
As a matter of practice, I put the dynamics directly in the note code,
even though my philosophical preference is to separate notes from
interpretation as much as possible. I'm not sure why--maybe to keep
down the number of independent music parts, I guess.
> In any case, I'm happy to be shown whe
Hey, all!
Just wanted to take an informal survey...
How many 'Ponders put their dynamics directly in the "note code", e.g.,
notes = { a\pp b }
and why?
How many 'Ponders use a separate dynamics variable, e.g.,
notes = { a b }
dynamics = { \pp }
<< \notes \dynamics >>
and why?
How many
