That was a quick answer but sadly not to my question.
I did not intend to keep the markup-ting in the bass-notes because it is
clearly something which belongs to the B.c player. Already for part of the
violoncello it would be quite distracting! My markup construction was just a
makeshift prop be
On 2011-12-25 17:43, C.Flothow wrote:
Hej!
in a piece which I've been transscribing there is repeatedly an
extender line in the figured bass without a number in front. This
means of course: hold the accord.
I've tried to indicate this with a markup, but that's of course not
the same.
[...]
Is
Am 25.12.2011 23:21, schrieb Xavier Scheuer:
On 25 December 2011 23:09, C.Flothow wrote:
That was a quick answer but sadly not to my question.
I did not intend to keep the markup-ting in the bass-notes because it is
clearly something which belongs to the B.c player. Already for part of the
viol
On 25 December 2011 23:09, C.Flothow wrote:
>
> That was a quick answer but sadly not to my question.
> I did not intend to keep the markup-ting in the bass-notes because it is
> clearly something which belongs to the B.c player. Already for part of the
> violoncello it would be quite distracting!
Am 25.12.2011 18:13, schrieb James:
Hello,
On 25 December 2011 16:43, C.Flothow wrote:
Hej!
in a piece which I've been transscribing there is repeatedly an extender
line in the figured bass without a number in front. This means of course:
hold the accord.
I've tried to indicate this with a mar
Hello,
On 25 December 2011 16:43, C.Flothow wrote:
> Hej!
> in a piece which I've been transscribing there is repeatedly an extender
> line in the figured bass without a number in front. This means of course:
> hold the accord.
> I've tried to indicate this with a markup, but that's of course not
Hej!
in a piece which I've been transscribing there is repeatedly an extender
line in the figured bass without a number in front. This means of
course: hold the accord.
I've tried to indicate this with a markup, but that's of course not the
same.
%
