On 2018-06-25 22:42, Urs Liska wrote:
Also, not directly. But you can make it happen.
Basically you have to define some variable in the top-level file, say
#(define is-main-file #t). Then you can check in the included file for
#(if (defined? is-main-file)
That was the general idea I was
Nah writes:
> Thanks. That gives me a good starting point. Will it work in a
> procedure? Something like:
> createLessons = #(make-scheme-function ( ... ))
>
> Can I assume the infinite loop to be caused by the ".ly" suffix being
> the same as the suffix of the main file? If I use ".ily" suffix
Thanks. That gives me a good starting point. Will it work in a
procedure? Something like:
createLessons = #(make-scheme-function ( ... ))
Can I assume the infinite loop to be caused by the ".ly" suffix being
the same as the suffix of the main file? If I use ".ily" suffix for all
the scores
Am 25.06.2018 um 21:19 schrieb Nah:
I have a project with 100+ scores, each in their own file. I tried to
create a Scheme function to \include each of them. After searching the
archive, I got the general idea of why my solution isn't working.
However, I didn't find something like a snippet
Am 26.06.2018 um 01:25 schrieb Aaron Hill:
On 2018-06-25 15:51, David Kastrup wrote:
Nah writes:
I have a project with 100+ scores, each in their own file. I tried to
create a Scheme function to \include each of them. After searching the
archive, I got the general idea of why my solution
On 26 June 2018 at 05:19, Nah wrote:
> I have a project with 100+ scores, each in their own file. I tried to create
> a Scheme function to \include each of them. After searching the archive, I
> got the general idea of why my solution isn't working. However, I didn't
> find something like a
On 2018-06-25 15:51, David Kastrup wrote:
Nah writes:
I have a project with 100+ scores, each in their own file. I tried to
create a Scheme function to \include each of them. After searching the
archive, I got the general idea of why my solution isn't
working. However, I didn't find something
Nah writes:
> I have a project with 100+ scores, each in their own file. I tried to
> create a Scheme function to \include each of them. After searching the
> archive, I got the general idea of why my solution isn't
> working. However, I didn't find something like a snippet that I could
> coax
I have a project with 100+ scores, each in their own file. I tried to
create a Scheme function to \include each of them. After searching the
archive, I got the general idea of why my solution isn't working.
However, I didn't find something like a snippet that I could coax into
what I want. I
Am 27.01.2018 um 16:53 schrieb Stefano Troncaro:
Thanks guys!
Urs, your explanation is very detailed and dissipated any remaining
doubts I had left about this issue.
Glad to hear :-)
Jan-Peter, I pulled the changes and after a quick test going through
some files everything seems to be
Thanks guys!
Urs, your explanation is very detailed and dissipated any remaining doubts
I had left about this issue.
Jan-Peter, I pulled the changes and after a quick test going through some
files everything seems to be working fine. I'll let you know if something
comes up.
About writing an
Thank you for your feedback Stefano!
I merged some code, which was pending quite some time. There was an
issue with the first moment inside a context that is fixed now, *but* in
your example it does not work (yet). This was quite tricky to track
down: If you create a new Voice inside a new
Hi Stefano,
Am 26.01.2018 um 22:41 schrieb Stefano Troncaro:
To the openlilylib guys, since I'll be learning to use your tools,
tell me if I can be of use somehow.
One thing would be of tremendous use for us: when you have understood
how something works you could write up the explanation
Hi Stefano,
I have now also looked at your example. I think your voicing is strange
even without considering the edition-engraver.
What you do is:
* Create a staff ("LH")
* Explicitly create a Voice ("Implied")
* Start the content of that Voice with the clef
* *Then* create two new
Thank you Noeck.
Your explanation makes sense and I feel it might be close to explaining the
issue, although in the log it appears as though the edition-engraver only
sees two voices, not three, thus refering to them as Voice.B and Voice.C
instead of A and B doesn't work either.
Most intriguing
Hi Stefano,
if you write
{ \clef F <<
as in your file eetest-not-working.ly you have this in your Staff
context: \clef F and then afterwards two voices at the same time.
More explicitly, your code is interpreted as somthing like:
\new Staff {
\new Voice { \clef F
<<
\new Voice ...
Thanks for the remark! Obviouslyis a private communication thread about
a special topic not for common lilypond users. I will not interfere.
Regards
Am 26.01.2018 18:52, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 26. Januar 2018 18:31:24 MEZ schrieb Simon Albrecht
:
On 26.01.2018 17:40,
Am 26. Januar 2018 18:31:24 MEZ schrieb Simon Albrecht :
>On 26.01.2018 17:40, Blöchl Bernhard wrote:
>> I tried your code with my standard lilypond without success.
>>
>> Obviously you use a package oll-core
>> https://github.com/openlilylib/oll-core
>> that is not part
On 26.01.2018 17:40, Blöchl Bernhard wrote:
I tried your code with my standard lilypond without success.
Obviously you use a package oll-core
https://github.com/openlilylib/oll-core
that is not part of standard install of lilypond and seems to be the
central problem of your code. May be you
I tryed your code with my standard lilypond without success.
Obviously you use a package oll-core
https://github.com/openlilylib/oll-core
that is not part of standard install of lilypond and seems to be the
central problem of your code. May be you get competent help of the
oll-core users?
Thank you Jan-Peter, that's really useful!
In regards to the first problem, I experimented with it a little. Using the
same snippet as before, It turns out that if I write this line like this:
> \new Staff \with { \editionID LH } { \clef F <<
>
> Then the path to Piano.LH.Voice.A doesn't seem to
Hello Stefano,
I can't reproduce the misbehaviour/error you mentioned first. The
overrides are applied irrespective of the clefs placement. If the error
persists, you might send the .edition.log file.
To reduce the redundancy you mentioned you can create variables:
LH = Piano.LH
RH =
Hello everyone! So, I'm learning to use the edition-engraver, but there are
some behaviors that I can't figure out.
Take the following snippet:
> \version "2.19.80"\language "english"
> \include "oll-core/package.ily"\loadPackage edition-engraver
> \addEdition test
> \editionMod test 1 0/4
ATH variable?
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* 410172 Chief <410...@gmail.com>
> *To:* lilypond-user@gnu.org
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:17 PM
> *Subject:* Need help with lilypond-book
>
> Dear all,
>
>
It seems clear that the system cannot find the lilypond executable. Have you
tried adding the path to lilypond to your PATH variable?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: 410172 Chief
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:17 PM
Subject: Need help
Dear all,
I need some help on getting Lilypond to work with LaTeX. I have worked with
both for quite some time now, but am unable to compile my .lytex.
For a start, I did not write my own scripts, but tried examples from
different websites like:
Hey Liam,
Welcome to LilyPond!
Unfortunately, I cannot help you out because your request lacks a few key
elements. A couple suggestions:
1) In order to get help faster, please send the list a minimal example of what
you are trying to accomplish in the .ly file. The picture is excellent, but
Am 16.07.2017 um 00:56 schrieb Liam Umbs:
For my first score, I am transcribing Chopin’s Waltz in A Minor, and I am
having trouble with the tuplets in measure 22.
The ly file is how mine looks, and the picture is how it should look. Also
confusing to me is the ottava I’m not quite
For my first score, I am transcribing Chopin’s Waltz in A Minor, and I am
having trouble with the tuplets in measure 22.
Frederic-Chopin-Waltz-in-A-Minor.ly
Description: Binary data
The ly file is how mine looks, and the picture is how it should look. Also
confusing to me is the ottava I’m
Il giorno lun 7 nov 2016 alle 20:00, Carl Sorensen
ha scritto:
On 11/7/16 8:48 AM, "Urs Liska" wrote:
Am 07.11.2016 um 15:35 schrieb David Sumbler:
On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 11:28 +0100, Malte Meyn wrote:
Am 06.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb David
On 11/7/16 8:48 AM, "Urs Liska" wrote:
>Am 07.11.2016 um 15:35 schrieb David Sumbler:
>> On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 11:28 +0100, Malte Meyn wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 06.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb David Sumbler:
How do I find out what changes have been made between (for
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 16:11 +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il giorno lun 7 nov 2016 alle 15:35, David Sumbler k>
> ha scritto:
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 11:28 +0100, Malte Meyn wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 06.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb David Sumbler:
> > > >
> > > >
Il giorno lun 7 nov 2016 alle 15:35, David Sumbler
ha scritto:
On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 11:28 +0100, Malte Meyn wrote:
Am 06.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb David Sumbler:
>
> How do I find out what changes have been made between (for
> instance)
> 2.19.48 and 2.19.49?
You
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 07.11.2016 um 15:35 schrieb David Sumbler:
>> On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 11:28 +0100, Malte Meyn wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 06.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb David Sumbler:
How do I find out what changes have been made between (for
instance)
2.19.48
Am 07.11.2016 um 15:35 schrieb David Sumbler:
> On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 11:28 +0100, Malte Meyn wrote:
>>
>> Am 06.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb David Sumbler:
>>>
>>> How do I find out what changes have been made between (for
>>> instance)
>>> 2.19.48 and 2.19.49?
>> You could read the commit messages
On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 11:28 +0100, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
> Am 06.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb David Sumbler:
> >
> > How do I find out what changes have been made between (for
> > instance)
> > 2.19.48 and 2.19.49?
> You could read the commit messages in the git log:
>
Am 06.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb David Sumbler:
How do I find out what changes have been made between (for instance)
2.19.48 and 2.19.49?
You could read the commit messages in the git log:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git/log/
___
I am using 2.19.48, and I haven't noticed any problems with it.
But is there anywhere a list of changes between successive "unstable"
versions? I can't find it.
The "Changes" manual doesn't help, because it is work in progress
(presumably) showing all the changes between 2.18 and what will
Dear Hans,
I just mentioned it to document here that David was right: I experienced
(for the first time) that development versions can be unstable. So I
blundered into trap with warning signs around.
>> Now, I try to use it and experience what I've seen on this list:
>>
>> time: 2m45.593s
>
>
> On 5 Nov 2016, at 22:16, Noeck wrote:
>
>>> We had some real nasties in the 40s. Maybe you did not update then.
>> No I did not update recently, I used 2.19.36 for a long time and 2.19.43
>> only for a short test of new syntax.
>
> Now, I try to use it and experience
>> We had some real nasties in the 40s. Maybe you did not update then.
> No I did not update recently, I used 2.19.36 for a long time and 2.19.43
> only for a short test of new syntax.
Now, I try to use it and experience what I've seen on this list:
time: 2m45.593s
> I don't find it difficult at all
If you say so, I agree. My choice is clear but I don't want to offend
anyone.
>> I never had problems with the latest version called 'unstable':
>> http://lilypond.org/development.html
>
> We had some real nasties in the 40s. Maybe you did not update then.
On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 12:35 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Noeck writes:
>
> > Welcome Peter,
> >
> >> 1. What application do you recommend - Frescobaldi or Denemo ?
> >> (at http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html)
> >
> > This is difficult, because there are of course
Noeck writes:
> Welcome Peter,
>
>> 1. What application do you recommend - Frescobaldi or Denemo ?
>> (at http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html)
>
> This is difficult, because there are of course advocates for both, in
> particular the developers.
I don't find it
Am 04.11.2016 um 22:11 schrieb Peter Lavetti:
Processing `/Users/peterlavetti/Desktop/Untitled.ly'
Parsing...
/Users/peterlavetti/Desktop/Untitled.ly:1: warning: no \version statement
found, please add
\version "2.18.2"
for future compatibility
Success: compilation successfully completed
Welcome Peter,
> 1. What application do you recommend - Frescobaldi or Denemo ?
> (at http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html)
This is difficult, because there are of course advocates for both, in
particular the developers.
My personal recommendation is Frescobaldi.
In combination with the
on the mac and running lilypond in a Linux VM.
Andrew
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+andrew.bernard=gmail@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Peter Lavetti
Sent: Saturday, 5 November 2016 11:55 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org; #lilyp...@irc.freenode.net
Subject: need help
Hi,
I
Hi,
I know very little about html codes and computer text editing, but I like the
look of LilyPond scores.
1. What application do you recommend - Frescobaldi or Denemo ?
(at http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html)
2. What version do you recommend I download for MAC OS 10.6.8 and 10.4.6 ?
I can't even begin to use this application. I click on it; see the new file and
save it; do Compile > Typeset file and then the 2nd window comes up with this:
Processing `/Users/peterlavetti/Desktop/Untitled.ly'
Parsing...
/Users/peterlavetti/Desktop/Untitled.ly:1: warning: no \version statement
On 06.03.2016 12:16, Karol Majewski wrote:
As for skylines: in a nutshell, skylines are invisible borders.
Setting them to #'() affects the shape of these borders.
IIUC, it rather removes the skyline, making the grob invisible for
spacing purposes, doesn’t it?
Best, Simon
Hi Andrew,
basically, this function allows to adjust the size of the whiteout box. It is especially useful in handling DynamicText-SpanBar collisions. Read the whole topic here:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Whiteout-box-function-by-Thomas-Morley-need-help-td161262.html
HI Karol,
Is there any introductory or tutorial material anywhere about vertical
skylines, and horizontal? I confess I really have very little comprehension of
this aspect of ilypond. [My perhaps myopic reading of the NR does not enlighten
me.]
Why does that setting do the job? What is its
OK, it seems that \override DynamicLineSpanner.vertical-skylines = #'() does the job.
There is an issue with DynamicText placed at the end of hairpin.
If DynamicText is placed after the end of hairpin and some extraWhiteout is added to the left of DynamicText then the whole DynamicText is
There is an issue with DynamicText placed at the end of hairpin.
If DynamicText is placed after the end of hairpin and some extraWhiteout is added to the left of DynamicText then the whole DynamicText is shifted to the right.
I want DynamicText to stay centered below note. Any suggestions are
Done! :-)
moreWhiteout =#(define-music-function (parser location adds item)(pair? symbol-list-or-music?) (define more-stencil-whiteout (lambda (grob) (let* ((function (assoc-get 'stencil (reverse (ly:grob-basic-properties grob (stil (if (and (procedure? function) (not (eq? (procedure-name
Thanks, David.
I've looked into this, but have no idea what's going on there. Here's crippled version of extraWhiteout function - works only for TextScript and allows to set X-extent only. But still don't know how to turn this into \tweak.
extraWhiteout =#(define-music-function (parser location
I'm trying to make this function work via \tweak. Grob-name string is no longer
needed. The following code doesn't work. Perhaps I missed something that is
obvious to schemers. Any ideas are welcome.
moreWhiteout =
#(define-music-function (parser location adds)(pair?)
(define
Hi Karol,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl wrote:
I'm trying to make this function work via \tweak. Grob-name string is no
longer needed. The following code doesn't work. Perhaps I missed something
that is obvious to schemers. Any ideas are welcome.
Hi Harm. This is quite an impressive piece of code! So far everything is fine
:-) Thank you very much. It should be added to LSR, I think.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2014-04-21 16:40 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
Harm,
this change is related to issue 621:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=621
Now, I do not accept this solution. It is simply against the rules.
DynamicText shouldn't have influence on spacaing. Therefore I
Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl writes:
Although I know nothing about scheme, I've managed to slim down this
function, so that there are no optional arguments. Now I'll try to find out
why it doesn't work for DynamicText grob.
Harm, thanks in advance for any hints. Perhaps we can mix your
Although I know nothing about scheme, I've managed to slim down this function,
so that there are no optional arguments. Now I'll try to find out why it
doesn't work for DynamicText grob.
Harm, thanks in advance for any hints. Perhaps we can mix your function with
flexible-stencil-whiteout (see
Hi Karol,
sorry coming back to you that late.
2014-04-21 13:22 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
Although I know nothing about scheme, I've managed to slim down this
function, so that there are no optional arguments. Now I'll try to find out
why it doesn't work for DynamicText grob.
2014-04-21 16:02 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
Hi Karol,
sorry coming back to you that late.
2014-04-21 13:22 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
Although I know nothing about scheme, I've managed to slim down this
function, so that there are no optional arguments.
Harm,
this change is related to issue 621:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=621
Now, I do not accept this solution. It is simply against the rules. DynamicText
shouldn't have influence on spacaing. Therefore I prefer whiteout.
So I use:
\context {
\Staff
\override
2014-04-21 16:40 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
Harm,
this change is related to issue 621:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=621
Now, I do not accept this solution. It is simply against the rules.
DynamicText shouldn't have influence on spacaing. Therefore I
Hi Harm
Function you wrote few days ago works for TextScript but not for DynamicText:
\moreWhiteout DynamicText #'(7 . 0) c'1
And only X-offset is added to DynamicText.
--Karol
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
The following:
{
\moreWhiteout DynamicText #'(2 . 0) c'1 \f
}
gives:
warning: DynamicText has empty extent and non-empty stencil.
warning: Not drawing a box with negative dimension, -0.74 by 2.59.
Warnings dissapear when \f is replaced by \mf.
-Karol
Hi Harm
Function you wrote few days
2014-04-09 18:50 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
Hi Harm
Function you wrote few days ago works for TextScript but not for DynamicText:
\moreWhiteout DynamicText #'(7 . 0) c'1
And only X-offset is added to DynamicText.
--Karol
Hi Karol,
I'm on it.
Though, because of little
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2014-04-06 11:39 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
Thanks Harm.
In SpanBar-Dynamics conflict I still prefer whiteout over
DynamicText.extra-spacing-width = ##f. The only problem is that
sometimes whiteout box does not cover the whole
Thanks again Harm. This is very useful function. Hopefully I'm not the only one
who appreciates it.
Hi Karol,
below the revised function.
'moreWhiteout' takes one optional and two normal arguments:
Specifying whether the stencil should be boxed (boolean), which grob
(string) and the
Thanks Harm.
In SpanBar-Dynamics conflict I still prefer whiteout over
DynamicText.extra-spacing-width = ##f. The only problem is that sometimes
whiteout box does not cover the whole barline width. Function I'm asking for
would allow to control the width of whiteout box.
BTW, In documentation
Hi all,
Function I'm asking for would allow to control the width of whiteout box.
Just to note [again] that I would much prefer a whiteout function that followed
the glyph outline (with a padding or margin parameter), rather than a rectangle.
And, of course, I’m happy to chip in bounty money
Am 06.04.2014 16:38, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi all,
Function I'm asking for would allow to control the width of whiteout box.
Just to note [again] that I would much prefer a whiteout function that followed
the glyph outline (with a padding or margin parameter), rather than a rectangle.
2014-04-06 11:39 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
Thanks Harm.
In SpanBar-Dynamics conflict I still prefer whiteout over
DynamicText.extra-spacing-width = ##f. The only problem is that sometimes
whiteout box does not cover the whole barline width. Function I'm asking for
would
This is a function written by Thomas Morley. It allows to control width and
height of whiteout box. Now I want to modify this function to make it work like:
\dynamicTextWhiteout #'(1 . 2)
where:
- first number is LEFT X-extent
- second number is RIGHT X-extent
I don't need Y-extent at all.
2014-04-06 0:09 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl:
This is a function written by Thomas Morley. It allows to control width and
height of whiteout box. Now I want to modify this function to make it work
like:
\dynamicTextWhiteout #'(1 . 2)
where:
- first number is LEFT X-extent
Hi, Tom!
To answer question 1 (and only 1), you need to add volta repeats to voice
two as well.
For that matter, utilizing the global variable is a good practice, I
think. Namely,
Add the following lines to the variable global:
\repeat volta 2 { s1*3/4*3 }
\alternative { {s1*3/4} {s1*3/4} }
I'm sorry, I noticed my solution doesn't work.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Madoka Machitani madok...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi, Tom!
To answer question 1 (and only 1), you need to add volta repeats to voice
two as well.
[omitting the wrong part]
So, It seems you have to explicitly write
Madoka -
Thanks for your response! I couldn't see how your solution could work,
upon first reading it, but the general idea of making ALL voices repeat
made instance sense. I've been away from Lilypond for about two years
and it shows! Thanks for your help - the corrupt midi issue was a big
My moderately small complete source file is here: http://pastie.org/7904566
I have two problems: a corrupt midi file, and a note head collision that
I cannot seem to fix.
Two things to note about the source: I am including articulate.ly, and
this is set up to produce cross-voice arpeggios,
You may also find me on #lilypond as deselby.
--
Ezequiel Birman
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Just to clarify, you'd have to copy only from the parts not the
reduction which is more reliable but very difficult to read. I'll deal
with it later. (Actually, I am actually using git to manage two
branches: parts and reduction. The final master branch shall be my
edited, final, playable
Hi. I need help with a string quartet. Nothing especially fancy nor long
(like 300 bars), but it has quite a lot of activity. I need help in
order to deliver as soon as posible. I can pay you but I'd prefer (and
probably you too since I cannot offer much) an exchange of favours.
Please let me
Hey all,
I am working on a fix to but 2260 and I am short on time. I know how to fix it
but I need help from an intrepid user to test the fix.
Is there a LilyPond user who would be willing to create one file with as many
broken spanners as possible. Something like:
\new Staff {
e'1
2012/2/1 m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com:
Hey all,
I am working on a fix to but 2260 and I am short on time. I know how to fix
it but I need help from an intrepid user to test the fix.
Is there a LilyPond user who would be willing to create one file with as many
broken
modified the Piano template to get the extra
voice per staff. It's probably not the best in the world, but it's the best
I know how to do with my limited knowledge.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Need-help-with-voices-and-staves-tp30337315p30337315.html
Sent from the Gnu
2010/11/30 George_ georgexu...@gmail.com:
I'm transcribing Bach's Fugue No. 20 in A minor from the Well-Tempered
Clavier Bk. 1, and I've run into a bit of a problem:
George: I can reproduce your problem. But my first advice is: try to
separate content from structure giving names to music
- Original Message -
From: George_ georgexu...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:30 AM
Subject: Need help with voices and staves
I'm transcribing Bach's Fugue No. 20 in A minor from the Well-Tempered
Clavier Bk. 1, and I've run into a bit
I'm suddenly getting an error I don't understand. I've compared my score
with other, similar ones, and cannot see a problem. This score has been
find for quite some, and now it won't compile. I really use a hint as to
the nature of the problem. I've reduced it to minimal code sufficient to
2010/1/12 Tom Cloyd tomcl...@comcast.net:
As you can see, it's rejecting the closing corner bracket. Makes no sense to
me, and as of now my work on this score is halted. Would appreciate any
help!!!
(75)\sfol \repeat percent 2 {c-18 [a-3 e' e,-2] |
There's a closing brace missing here
Tom Cloyd wrote:
I'm suddenly getting an error I don't understand. [...]
The score may be seen here: http://pastie.org/775801
Here's the error msg:
t...@tomc-desktop:~/Music/Music_scores/Lilypond$ lilypond arabesque-b.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.12.3
Processing `arabesque-b.ly'
Parsing...
Alexander Kobel wrote:
Besides, in the same line and in line 95, the note name before 8 is
missing (both times after the opening brace of \repeat percent).
Ugh. Bad Pastie, bad. Not escaping in HTML code, you are!
That's why I missed the chords, so sorry for the noise - I agree with Neil.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
Well I've accumulated quite a lot of useful stuff for notating guitar
scores, and which could be useful to other users, but what version of
Lilypond does it need to work with in order to go in the LSR?
The latest
On 20/12/09 12:17, Hugh Myers wrote:
In Segovia's 'Diatonic Major and Minor Scales', under the notes shown
for a given scale are marks beginning with a number surrounded by
parenthesis followed by a line vaguely parallel to the notes,
concluding with an uptick between a given pair of notes. What
Here is what I've pieced together thus far:
%%
%%
%% s1.ly -- first scale from Diatonic Major and Minor Scales by Andres Segovia
%%
%%
\version 2.13.7
\header {
title = Diatonic Major and Minor Scales
subtitle = Scale 1
composer = Andres Segovia
meter = Practice each scale
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Hugh Myers hsmy...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is what I've pieced together thus far:
Guys, whereever this discussion is going please remember to add
something to the LSR if you come up with an interesting piece of
code... :)
Cheers,
Valentin
On 21/12/09 02:29, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Hugh Myershsmy...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is what I've pieced together thus far:
Guys, whereever this discussion is going please remember to add
something to the LSR if you come up with an interesting piece
In Segovia's 'Diatonic Major and Minor Scales', under the notes shown
for a given scale are marks beginning with a number surrounded by
parenthesis followed by a line vaguely parallel to the notes,
concluding with an uptick between a given pair of notes. What is this
called and how might I
Here's a link to what is being mentioned here:
http://www.sheetmusicplus.com/look_inside/1938302/image/137025
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of Hugh
Myers
Sent: Sun 20/12/2009 1:17
To: lilypond-user
Subject: Need help before I
101 - 200 of 278 matches
Mail list logo