2011/9/13 Klaus Föhl :
>> I'd also consider writing this in the following manner:
>>
>> \new Staff <<
>> \new Voice { \voiceOne f'2. }
>> \new Voice { \voiceFour c'2~ ( 4 ) }
>> >>
>
> Which is the alternative I did not want to use, or similar in notation
>
> \relative c' << f2. \\ { \voiceTwo
Hello,
> \new Staff <<
> \new Voice { \voiceOne f'2. }
> \new Voice { \voiceTwo c'2. }
> \new Voice { \voiceFour c'2 ( g4 ) }
> >>
One needs both \new Voice and \voiceFour to make it work.
\relative c' << f2. \\ << c2. \new Voice { \voiceFour c2( g4) } >> >>
In reality the music is longer
Hi,
2011/9/13 Klaus Föhl :
> Hello,
>
> tiny example:
>
> \relative c' << f2. \\ << c2. { c2 g4 } >> >>
>
> question: the c2 is noted without a stem, it does however touch the stem of
> the
> c2. note. Is this mirror-image ok notationwise?
I think it's not good. In particular the dots are confu
Hello,
tiny example:
\relative c' << f2. \\ << c2. { c2 g4 } >> >>
question: the c2 is noted without a stem, it does however touch the stem of the
c2. note. Is this mirror-image ok notationwise? I am asking because an older
music sheet shows a situation similar to c2. and c2 as separate notes.
