On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 11:11 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
[Lilypond 2.13.21]
Hey all,
I'm trying to get a score out this afternoon (for a competition deadline
tomorrow!) and I'm running into a bug...
Sorry, I'm on holiday and I haven't been checking email regularly, so
this probably
Hi Joe,
No doubt one or more of my problems is related to the known bug regarding
the missing properties
blank-page-force = 0
blank-after-score-page-force = 0
but I've explicitly set that as well.
Which known bug is this? I searched the bug tracker for
blank and blank-page-force with
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 13:00 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Joe,
No doubt one or more of my problems is related to the known bug regarding
the missing properties
blank-page-force = 0
blank-after-score-page-force = 0
but I've explicitly set that as well.
Which known bug is
[Lilypond 2.13.21]
Hey all,
I'm trying to get a score out this afternoon (for a competition deadline
tomorrow!) and I'm running into a bug...
My score looks quite nice on 17 systems spread over 5 pages -- I would like:
Page 1: title + 3
Pages 2-4: 4 systems
Page 5: 2 systems
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
My score looks quite nice on 17 systems spread over 5 pages -- I would like:
Page 1: title + 3
Pages 2-4: 4 systems
Page 5: 2 systems
Other than manually inserting breaks, what can I do to get Lilypond
Hi Graham,
I think that manual breaks are the easiest solution. You could
separate it into distinct \bookparts, but that would be much more work
than manually adding \break and \pageBreak.
OK... =\
No disrespect meant to anyone, in particular Joe who has done a fabulous job
increasing the
Hi Graham,
For the record, I just added \pageBreaks where I want them... and Lilypond
outputted 25 pages: it added 20 blank pages and scattered them amongst the 5
with actual music.
MAO!!! =(
Kieren.
On 2010-May-31, at 11:36, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Graham,
I think that manual breaks
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
For the record, I just added \pageBreaks where I want them... and Lilypond
outputted 25 pages: it added 20 blank pages and scattered them amongst the 5
with actual music.
MAO!!! =(
Stick the \pageBreak
On 31 May 2010 16:11, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Unfortunately, minimal-breaking causes Lilypond to [try to] cram everything
on one page
You have to use manual breaks with minimal-breaking (though I think a
bug's crept in too since 2.13.19: both regression tests for
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
MAO MAO-ING MAO, can we please resolve these spacing issues ASAP?
At the risk of making a crude masturbation joke, if I could wave a
magic wand to fix stuff, I'd be waving my wand all day and night.
Sorry
Hi Graham,
Stick the \pageBreak in the 1st violin part, not the global{} part?
I'm guessing here, but maybe two simultaneous \pageBreaks aren't
treated/recognized as simultaneous?
Thanks for the guess... but I *do* have it in only one part (by creating a
separate, score-specific variable,
Hi Neil,
Unfortunately, minimal-breaking causes Lilypond to [try to] cram
everything on one page
You have to use manual breaks with minimal-breaking (though I think a
bug's crept in too since 2.13.19: both regression tests for
minimal-breaking have started complaining).
Wait... one HAS
Hi Graham,
At the risk of making a crude masturbation joke, if I could wave a
magic wand to fix stuff, I'd be waving my wand all day and night.
=)
For the record, there are NO KNOWN BUGS with the new spacing algorithm.
So
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-01/msg00086.html
On 31 May 2010 17:07, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Wait... one HAS to use \pageBreak if you set minimal-breaking?
According to the texidocs for the minimal-breaking regression tests, yes.
Does that really make sense?
It doesn't seem to offer anything useful over
Hi Neil,
Wait... one HAS to use \pageBreak if you set minimal-breaking?
According to the texidocs for the minimal-breaking regression tests, yes.
According to Notation,
The ly:minimal-breaking function performs minimal computations to calculate
the page breaking: it fills a page with as many
On 2010-05-31 17:41, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Graham,
For the record, I just added \pageBreaks where I want them... and Lilypond
outputted 25 pages: it added 20 blank pages and scattered them amongst the 5
with actual music.
Hi, Kieren,
I assume you already defined page-count = #5?
On 2010-05-31 19:14, Alexander Kobel wrote:
On 2010-05-31 17:41, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Graham,
For the record, I just added \pageBreaks where I want them... and
Lilypond outputted 25 pages: it added 20 blank pages and scattered
them amongst the 5 with actual music.
Hi, Kieren,
I assume
Le 31 mai 2010 à 17:57, Neil Puttock a écrit :
On 31 May 2010 16:11, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Unfortunately, minimal-breaking causes Lilypond to [try to] cram
everything on one page
You have to use manual breaks with minimal-breaking (though I think a
bug's
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 07:14:30PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote:
I assume you already defined page-count = #5? There's a known issue (at
least it's been on the mailing lists, no clue whether it's in the bug
tracker and/or some known issues section in the docs) as follows:
If page-count is
Le 31 mai 2010 à 17:11, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
[Lilypond 2.13.21]
Hey all,
I'm trying to get a score out this afternoon (for a competition deadline
tomorrow!) and I'm running into a bug...
My score looks quite nice on 17 systems spread over 5 pages -- I would like:
Page 1: title
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:23:40PM +0200, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
If you compile LilyPond yourself, you might try the following patch:
~~~
...
+ compute_line_heights ();
ROTFLMAO! That email is epic p0wnage.
Given Kieren's problems trying to compile lilypond... given his
Hi Graham,
1) I see no indication that it was ever added to the issue
tracker; hence my no KNOWN bugs still qualifies. And I don't
think that we've ever claimed that we'd acknowledge bugs sent to
the user list.
No, the fact that the bug discussion was between two main
developers does not
Hey Graham,
ROTFLMAO!
So *that's* where mao comes from... ;)
That email is epic p0wnage.
;-p
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 31 May 2010 22:29, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
OK... I guess I'm just surprised that Joe didn't submit it, since it's his
code, he personally confirmed/acknowledged the bug, and he appears to be a
pretty conscientious dev.
Hmm, are you sure this bug still
On 31 May 2010 22:52, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, are you sure this bug still exists? I've just tested Reinhold's
snippet from that thread, and it works fine in 2.13.23.
Aha, found the fix:
Hi Neil,
Aha, found the fix:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=337f9c142a82cc9e844ea3ce4beacfc4c24d5993
(precedes 2.13.11)
Looks like Joe was pretty conscientious here. ;)
I knew my faith wasn't misplaced. =)
Thanks,
Kieren.
Graham,
Since none of those are in the tracker as a Critical issue, none
of them are show-stoppers for 2.14.
May I say that
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=884
being labelled as medium causes me to wonder about the whole bug prioritizing
system. Is there some logic to what
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 07:59:20PM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Graham,
Since none of those are in the tracker as a Critical issue, none
of them are show-stoppers for 2.14.
May I say that
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=884
being labelled as medium causes me to
Graham,
Note that even truly embarrassing mistakes are not Critical --
those are High. I wouldn't call 884 truly embarrassing, though.
But undocumented output suffixes is?
At least, not in comparison to various other longstanding bugs.
(are you starting to understand why I'm so
29 matches
Mail list logo
