Re: Spontini and tags

> From: "Paolo Prete" > To: "bobroff" > Cc: "Lillypond Users Mailing List" > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 5:19:38 PM > Subject: Re: Spontini and tags > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:39 PM [ mailto:bobr...@centrum.is | > bobr...@centrum.is >

Re: Spontini and tags

d with Spontini to get familiar with this new (to >> me) tool. When setting parts in different clefs it is handy to be able to >> use tags. When notating a part in bass vs tenor or alto clef (pedagogical >> trombone music) it is often necessary to adjust shapes/positions >> di

Re: Spontini and tags

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:39 PM bobr...@centrum.is wrote: > Still monkeying around with Spontini to get familiar with this new (to me) > tool. When setting parts in different clefs it is handy to be able to use > tags. When notating a part in bass vs tenor or alto clef (pedagogical &

Spontini and tags

Still monkeying around with Spontini to get familiar with this new (to me) tool. When setting parts in different clefs it is handy to be able to use tags. When notating a part in bass vs tenor or alto clef (pedagogical trombone music) it is often necessary to adjust shapes/positions differently

Re: Variables, tags, filtering, conditions

On 19/05/2024 12:11, Giles Boardman wrote: Hello Timothy, Looks about perfect to me. Thank you very much. I can see how it's working and there are obviously a lot of other programming possibilities hinted at that I haven't found the documentation for. Where do I read about #( if (string=? an

Re: Variables, tags, filtering, conditions

nks Giles From: Timothy Lanfear Sent: 19 May 2024 12:03 To: Giles Boardman ; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Variables, tags, filtering, conditions On 19/05/2024 11:36, Giles Boardman wrote: Hello, I am an occasional Bb clarinetist and very bad at transposing on the fly. I wou

Re: Variables, tags, filtering, conditions

On 19/05/2024 11:36, Giles Boardman wrote: Hello, I am an occasional Bb clarinetist and very bad at transposing on the fly. I would like to create alternative versions of a score based on the value of a parameter. How about this as a solution? \version "2.24.0" instrument = "clarinet" tp

Variables, tags, filtering, conditions

about controlling and filtering using tags and I have seen #(if in the SATB template and read about \if and \unless, but I can't put it all together and do something like (in a pseudo-code example) ... Set a variable "myInstrument" to be "Clarinet" Subsequently

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

Valentin, Thank you, for the detailed explanation and the links.  Jean's website-book is a wonderful resource. Peace, David

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

Hello David, > I do have a difference in the the output of the code below, which does > not use \new Staff. > > Without \textLengthOn, it makes two staves. With \textLenthOn, it > combines the two music expressions into one stave. Why is that happening? That is one of the many pitfalls with auto

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

tags is the only way I have found to do that. I am glad that I have a method that works. Thank you for clearly conveying to me that I should keep global variables static! There is nothing that speaks against using tags for this, but you can do this totally fine using music function. Not that it is

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

Hello David, > My conundrum is that I want to call the same music expression (that is > declared as a variable) from different staves, but also cause markup > functions inside the music expression to behave differently from outside > the music expression. Using tags is the only way

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

anytime the function is called!). So using functions allows you to control when things are evaluated. To be more specific: It allows us to evaluate the same thing in different manners. Using tags will first evaluate an expression and then modify the resulting object as you like. But instead we can

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

using functions allows you to control when things are evaluated. To be more specific: It allows us to evaluate the same thing in different manners. Using tags will first evaluate an expression and then modify the resulting object as you like. But instead we can use a function to actually directly

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

fects the markup/music functions within that staff and not other staves. I hope that I am not belaboring the point. The method with the static global variables, tags, music function, and markup function works. I am just wondering if there is a simpler way. Peace, David

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

Am Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2023, 05:32:28 CEST schrieb dfro: > \version "2.24.1" > > #(define-markup-command >(symbol > layout props > var staff-variable) >(markup? markup?) >(interpret-markup > layout props > #{ \markup \concat { "Symbol " #var #staff-variable } #} > )

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

}) \musicfn textI \musicfn textII Note that here it is necessary to first create the global binding using #(define ...) and then use (set! ...) to change that binding. Cheers, Valentin Am Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2023, 21:58:49 CEST schrieb dfro: I want to define and change variables mid-stream in

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

}) \musicfn textI \musicfn textII Note that here it is necessary to first create the global binding using #(define ...) and then use (set! ...) to change that binding. Cheers, Valentin Am Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2023, 21:58:49 CEST schrieb dfro: I want to define and change variables mid-stream in

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

quot;C")) > #(if (equal? tag 'textII) (set! l "D")) > c''1^\markup\l >#}) > > \musicfn textI > \musicfn textII > > Note that here it is necessary to first create the global binding using > #(define ...) and then use (set! ...

Re: Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

is necessary to first create the global binding using #(define ...) and then use (set! ...) to change that binding. Cheers, Valentin Am Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2023, 21:58:49 CEST schrieb dfro: > I want to define and change variables mid-stream in a music expression, > while also using tags. Be

Defining variables mid-stream in a music expression using tags.

I want to define and change variables mid-stream in a music expression, while also using tags. Below is an example of what I am trying; but, it does not work. \version "2.24.1" \keepWithTag #'textI %\keepWithTag #'textII {   \tag #'textI { #(define l "A"

Re: Tags and ossias

Wow, what an adorable solution! Merci beaucoup, Jean! You have a gift! F. El mar, 9 may 2023 a las 11:35, Jean Abou Samra () escribió: > Le mardi 09 mai 2023 à 11:10 -0300, Federico Sarudiansky a écrit : > > Hi everyone! Please consider the following problem: a work for a soloist > and accompa

Re: Tags and ossias

Le mardi 09 mai 2023 à 11:10 -0300, Federico Sarudiansky a écrit : > Hi everyone!  > Please consider the following problem: a work for a soloist and accompaniment > in which there is an «alternative» part. For instance, a work for flute and > guitar which the composer allows to be played on viol

Tags and ossias

Hi everyone! Please consider the following problem: a work for a soloist and accompaniment in which there is an «alternative» part. For instance, a work for flute and guitar which the composer allows to be played on violin. The solo parts are almost identical, and differ only in isolated places. F

Re: Tags for contexts without duration

Le 15/04/2022 à 14:12, Kieren MacMillan a écrit : Hi Dimitris, If you get into more numerous and complex tweaks, I highly recommend using the edition-engraver — keeping presentation tweaks (e.g., moving a RehearsalMark) out of the note code is my primary use-case for the EE. Hope that helps!

Re: Tags for contexts without duration

Hi Dimitris, If you get into more numerous and complex tweaks, I highly recommend using the edition-engraver — keeping presentation tweaks (e.g., moving a RehearsalMark) out of the note code is my primary use-case for the EE. Hope that helps! Kieren.

Re: Tags for contexts without duration

Chaire Demetrios! tags work by assigning a special tag attribute to a music event and can therefore be applied to any music event by the syntax \tag tag music. But in my opinion tags are not always the best method to achieve such things, especially should you ever want to have something like

Re: Tags for contexts without duration

Oh wow I can't believe I missed this use of tags. I was trying to use the bracket syntax. Thanks Jean! On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 12:43 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > Le 14/04/2022 à 22:44, Dimitris Marinakis a écrit : > > I often find myself in need of offsetting some tempo or rehea

Re: Tags for contexts without duration

Le 14/04/2022 à 22:44, Dimitris Marinakis a écrit : I often find myself in need of offsetting some tempo or rehearsal marks for certain parts but not the full score but tags won't work in this case since I can't have two marks at the same location on a single context. Not sure I

Tags for contexts without duration

I often find myself in need of offsetting some tempo or rehearsal marks for certain parts but not the full score but tags won't work in this case since I can't have two marks at the same location on a single context. It is a lot of work to duplicate the whole context just to different

Re: tags

Hello David, I've submitted a merge request > that will at > least make the following work for your purpose: > > \version "2.23.3" > music = {\tag#'here a a} > {\pushToTag #'here ~ \music } > [] > I don't like the sample code in the

Re: tags

Gianmaria Lari writes: > Be patient with me. > > I expect this to generate {a~a} but it generates {a a} . Why? > > \version "2.23.2" > music = {a \tag#'here a} > {\pushToTag #'here ~ \music } I've submitted a merge request that will at

Re: tags

Gianmaria Lari writes: > Ciao David, > > [] > >> At any rate, \pushToTag's documentation states: >> >>Sometimes you want to splice some music at a particular place in an >> existing music expression. You can use ‘\pushToTag’ and ‘\appendToTag’ >> for adding material at the fr

Re: tags

Gianmaria Lari writes: >> How is { ~ } correct? ~ is not standalone music. >> >> > Maybe it would be nice to get an error message when you try to use a wrong > object with \pushToTag etc. At the current point of time, \pushToTag is more of a low-level hack not looking at what it is working with

Re: tags

> How is { ~ } correct? ~ is not standalone music. > > Maybe it would be nice to get an error message when you try to use a wrong object with \pushToTag etc.

Re: tags

Ciao David, [] > At any rate, \pushToTag's documentation states: > >Sometimes you want to splice some music at a particular place in an > existing music expression. You can use ‘\pushToTag’ and ‘\appendToTag’ > for adding material at the front or end of the ‘elements’ of an >

Re: tags

David Kastrup writes: > Gianmaria Lari writes: > >> Be patient with me. >> >> I expect this to generate {a~a} but it generates {a a} . Why? >> >> \version "2.23.2" >> music = {a \tag#'here a} >> {\pushToTag #'here ~ \music } >> >> The \displayLilyMusic output looks "correct". >> >> >> { { a4 \ta

Re: tags

Gianmaria Lari writes: > Be patient with me. > > I expect this to generate {a~a} but it generates {a a} . Why? > > \version "2.23.2" > music = {a \tag#'here a} > {\pushToTag #'here ~ \music } > > The \displayLilyMusic output looks "correct". > > > { { a4 \tag #'here { ~ } a4 } } How is { ~ } cor

tags

Be patient with me. I expect this to generate {a~a} but it generates {a a} . Why? \version "2.23.2" music = {a \tag#'here a} {\pushToTag #'here ~ \music } The \displayLilyMusic output looks "correct". { { a4 \tag #'here { ~ } a4 } } * * * I also tried this \version "2.23.2" music = {a \

Idea: Use tags for unfolded repeats

Hello! Sometimes you get a repeated section where only some repeats are somehow annotated – let’s say a dynamic marking, some sort of markup or whatever. So I suggest: \repeat unfold should take tags like let’s say #_repeat_1, #_repeat_2, ... (maybe with an option for some sort of ”namespace

Interaction between Tags and partCombine

Tags are used to conditionally include music expressions in multiple scores prepared from the same source text. partCombine is used to merge separate parts onto a single staff. These two features interact in ways I found surprising. There are musical expressions that I want printed only in the

Re: partCombine confused by tags

ecause \partCombine seems only > > partially to understand tags. > > That is a misstatement. \partCombine does not use tags in any > manner. > It plays the music it is given and records the results. Then it > combines the played results. I am surprised that \keepWithTag should >

Re: partCombine confused by tags

David Sumbler writes: > I have just spent half a day trying to work out why one staff in my > orchestral score extends beyond the final barline. > > Eventually I found out that it is because \partCombine seems only > partially to understand tags. That is a misstatement. \partC

partCombine confused by tags

I have just spent half a day trying to work out why one staff in my orchestral score extends beyond the final barline. Eventually I found out that it is because \partCombine seems only partially to understand tags. The following example illustrates this: % \version

Re: Libraries (was: Re: Read git tags using Scheme)

On 4/18/20, Noeck wrote: > It could not adapt this to my situation: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11961400/getting-rid-of-git-usr-local-lib-libz-so-1-no-version-information-available > Any idea about this? Well, the easiest solution I found was to compile LilyPond myself. Not, however, th

Libraries (was: Re: Read git tags using Scheme)

Hi Am 17.04.20 um 00:40 schrieb Noeck: > Parsing...git: /…path/to…/lilypond-2.20.0-1/lilypond/usr/lib/libz.so.1: > no version information available (required by git) It seems to be a library issue. The shared library exists. It is a symlink to libz.so.1.2.3 It could not adapt this to my situat

Read git tags using Scheme

Hi, I am using the function below which is adapted from http://lilypondblog.org/2014/01/why-use-version-control-for-engraving-scores/#more-2151 While it works and the .ly files compile successfully, the function issues a warning (?) I’d like to get rid of. 1) If the document is in a git director

Re: Tags with multiple bookparts

< > %% n.ily %%% > \layout { >\context { > \Score > \override NoteHead.color = #green >} > } > %% main.ly % > \include "m.ily" >\music > >> > \include "n.ily" >} > }

Re: Tags with multiple bookparts

>>     \include "n.ily"   } } %%% or even more weird stuff. HTH, Simon On 21.11.19 16:56, Peter Toye wrote: Tags with multiple bookparts I want to produce two different outputs from the same music which has several bookparts. Tagging would seem ideal for this

Tags with multiple bookparts

I want to produce two different outputs from the same music which has several bookparts. Tagging would seem ideal for this, but it seems that \keepWithTag is only valid within \score {}. Oddly, Frescobaldi's auto-complete allows me to type it both before the \book block and before the first \bo

Re: Tags template, for markup?

On 6/26/2018 4:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Ben writes: On 6/26/2018 4:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Ben writes: Hello everyone, I'm learning very quickly just how incredibly powerful the tags system can be, but today my brain just can't get past one hurdle. I am hoping someone c

Re: Tags template, for markup?

Ben writes: > On 6/26/2018 4:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> Ben writes: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> I'm learning very quickly just how incredibly powerful the tags system >>> can be, but today my brain just can't get past one

Re: Tags template, for markup?

On 6/26/2018 4:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Ben writes: Hello everyone, I'm learning very quickly just how incredibly powerful the tags system can be, but today my brain just can't get past one hurdle. I am hoping someone can help me to grasp this: suppose I would like to s

Re: Tags template, for markup?

Ben writes: > Hello everyone, > > I'm learning very quickly just how incredibly powerful the tags system > can be, but today my brain just can't get past one hurdle. > > I am hoping someone can help me to grasp this: suppose I would like to > setup a tag template (

Tags template, for markup?

Hello everyone, I'm learning very quickly just how incredibly powerful the tags system can be, but today my brain just can't get past one hurdle. I am hoping someone can help me to grasp this: suppose I would like to setup a tag template (for my visualizing and learning) so I ca

Re: Interesting glitch when using tags ...

On 04.02.2018 21:27, Wols Lists wrote: The problem here is that your two melody passages are all in the same voice, and that means that f4 is_not_ the next note after f4. ~ but rather the d8 in the previous line of entry is. Oh ... so lily is being its usual rather non-intuitive self :-) That

Re: Interesting glitch when using tags ...

d the > context in my first post :-) Doesn't show which tags are left in, and when preceding it with something like \new ChoirStaff puts the lines in different contexts. Also is missing the language and isn't compilable so that people have to either not compile at all and guess, or f

Re: Interesting glitch when using tags ...

> looks better > (but I have no idea whether the voice crossing then in the first half is > intentional, or even whether you wanted the original in which case you'd > like be better off with two staves). The original is a part with two instruments, so no, two staves is very defini

Re: Interesting glitch when using tags ...

Wol's lists writes: > Okay. You wanted a minimal example ... > > But surely, "f4. ~ f4" is clearly something wrong if it's complaining > about an unterminated tie? Yes you might need a bit more information > to debug it, but on the face of it it's a blatant bug ... And when looking closer at an

Re: Interesting glitch when using tags ...

Whoops - I've just spotted a genuine unterminated tie at the end of the first line of notes - but removing it does not get rid of the warning... So this minimal example demonstrates both a genuine unterminated tie that doesn't warn, and a terminated tie that warns when it shouldn't... Cheers,

Re: Interesting glitch when using tags ...

Okay. You wanted a minimal example ... But surely, "f4. ~ f4" is clearly something wrong if it's complaining about an unterminated tie? Yes you might need a bit more information to debug it, but on the face of it it's a blatant bug ... Cheers, Wol On 04/02/18 00:59, David Kastrup wrote: Wol

Re: Interesting glitch when using tags ...

2018-02-04 1:54 GMT+01:00 Wols Lists : > On 04/02/18 00:33, David Kastrup wrote: >> Wol's lists writes: >> >>> I suspect the cause is that I'm mixing slurs and ties, but I'm getting >>> the following error ... >>> >>> voiceTrombone.ily:30:59: warning: unterminated tie >>> \repeat percent 4 { f

Re: Interesting glitch when using tags ...

Wols Lists writes: > On 04/02/18 00:33, David Kastrup wrote: >> Wol's lists writes: >> >>> I suspect the cause is that I'm mixing slurs and ties, but I'm getting >>> the following error ... >>> >>> voiceTrombone.ily:30:59: warning: unterminated tie >>> \repeat percent 4 { f,8[ r f] f[ r f]

Re: Interesting glitch when using tags ...

On 04/02/18 00:33, David Kastrup wrote: > Wol's lists writes: > >> I suspect the cause is that I'm mixing slurs and ties, but I'm getting >> the following error ... >> >> voiceTrombone.ily:30:59: warning: unterminated tie >> \repeat percent 4 { f,8[ r f] f[ r f] } | f4. >>

Re: Interesting glitch when using tags ...

Wol's lists writes: > I suspect the cause is that I'm mixing slurs and ties, but I'm getting > the following error ... > > voiceTrombone.ily:30:59: warning: unterminated tie > \repeat percent 4 { f,8[ r f] f[ r f] } | f4. > ~ f4 r8 | a8-> r4 >

Interesting glitch when using tags ...

I suspect the cause is that I'm mixing slurs and ties, but I'm getting the following error ... voiceTrombone.ily:30:59: warning: unterminated tie \repeat percent 4 { f,8[ r f] f[ r f] } | f4. ~ f4 r8 | a8-> r4 a8-> r4 | a2. | bf2.( but as

Re: Tags and chord repetition

Peter Crighton writes: > Hello all, > > I came upon some unexpected behaviour when using a tag on, for example, a > markup that is attached to a chord repetition symbol (see below). > How can I fix this, so only the markup and not also the chord repetition > symbol gets tagged? > > > \version "2.

Re: Tags and chord repetition

Alright, I wrote to the Bug list. -- Peter Crighton | Musician & Music Engraver based in Mainz, Germany http://www.petercrighton.de 2016-09-10 21:32 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht : > On 10.09.2016 20:38, Peter Crighton wrote: > >> I came upon some unexpected behaviour when using a tag on, for exampl

Re: Tags and chord repetition

On 10.09.2016 20:38, Peter Crighton wrote: I came upon some unexpected behaviour when using a tag on, for example, a markup that is attached to a chord repetition symbol (see below). How can I fix this, so only the markup and not also the chord repetition symbol gets tagged? Sorry, no idea. I

Tags and chord repetition

Hello all, I came upon some unexpected behaviour when using a tag on, for example, a markup that is attached to a chord repetition symbol (see below). How can I fix this, so only the markup and not also the chord repetition symbol gets tagged? \version "2.19.47" x = \tag #'tabstaff ^x music =

Re: Using multiple tags

On 18/03/2015 15:06, Simon Albrecht wrote: Indeed: only recently, David Kastrup introduced the tagGroup command, which serves for exactly this purpose. See and

Re: Using multiple tags

Am 18.03.2015 um 14:42 schrieb Anton Curl: Hi everyone! I like using tags in my scores but it becomes complicated: I want to use tags for: - layout or midi - score or part - first / second / third / fourth time a variable is used I could always use removeWithTag, but - for the third case it&#

Using multiple tags

Hi everyone! I like using tags in my scores but it becomes complicated: I want to use tags for: - layout or midi - score or part - first / second / third / fourth time a variable is used I could always use removeWithTag, but - for the third case it's not handy, because I would have to ad

Re: How to remove tags from music returned by \keepWithTag ?

Jim Long umpquanet.com> writes: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:49:05AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote: > > > > Something in > > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=871 > > which matches your needs? > > (didn't test myself) > \taggedRep looks especially interesting. I often use the > 'extractMusic'

Re: How to remove tags from music returned by \keepWithTag ?

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:49:05AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote: > > Something in > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=871 > which matches your needs? > (didn't test myself) > > Cheers, > Harm Thank you, Harm! That looks very promising. I must train myself to remember the snippet repository wh

Re - How to remove tags from music returned by \keepWithTag ?

Jim Why do you want to remove tags? I must be missing something - AFAIA tags are not engraved. regards Peter Gentry ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: How to remove tags from music returned by \keepWithTag ?

musicA = \relative c'' { \tag #'a { a a a a } } > > What I want is: > > musicA = \relative c'' { a a a a } > > In other words, I'd like to find a function similar to > \keepWithTag, except that the returned music expression would be > entir

How to remove tags from music returned by \keepWithTag ?

27;' { a a a a } In other words, I'd like to find a function similar to \keepWithTag, except that the returned music expression would be entirely free of all tags. Perhaps even better would be a general function which simply strips \tag attributes from a music expression, but leaves th

Re: Tags in Lyrics

Hi Harm, Am 26.10.2014 um 13:38 schrieb Joram: > Thanks for all your responses. I will try the \ext functions as soon as > I have a recent version of LP available. Perfect, thanks! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.

Re: Tags in Lyrics

Thanks Harm, that does what I wanted to: The voice named in the function argument gets an extender line, a tag is computed for all other voices and these don’t get an extender line, but only the syllable which serves as a second argument to the function. Kudos, Simon Am 26.10.2014 um 01:10 sc

Re: Tags in Lyrics

Thanks for all your responses. I will try the \ext functions as soon as I have a recent version of LP available. In the current piece I ended up having separate lyrics for each voice as there are too many polyphonic parts with different lyrics. But this functions seem helpful for other pieces.

Re: Tags in Lyrics

2014-10-25 14:46 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht : > Am 24.10.2014 um 21:48 schrieb Thomas Morley: > >> 2014-10-24 21:19 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht : >> [...] >>> >>> I tried to, but somehow an >>> extender line inside a music function body gives a syntax error and I’ve >>> got >>> no clue how to circumvent

Re: Tags in Lyrics

Am 24.10.2014 um 21:48 schrieb Thomas Morley: 2014-10-24 21:19 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht : [...] I tried to, but somehow an extender line inside a music function body gives a syntax error and I’ve got no clue how to circumvent that. You’ll find the current function attached. Can anyone help, plea

Re: Tags in Lyrics

2014-10-24 21:19 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht : [...] > I tried to, but somehow an > extender line inside a music function body gives a syntax error and I’ve got > no clue how to circumvent that. You’ll find the current function attached. > Can anyone help, please? No attachment ;) -Harm ___

Re: Tags in Lyrics

Hello Noeck, hello everybody, at least you can save a lot of typing from v2.18 on: Am 24.10.2014 um 09:25 schrieb Noeck: Hi, when I write choir pieces I like to have one song text for all voices and to use tags. Often, the differences are only whether there is an extender line or not \tag &q

Tags in Lyrics

Hi, when I write choir pieces I like to have one song text for all voices and to use tags. Often, the differences are only whether there is an extender line or not \tag "A" Where __ \tag "S" \tag "T" \tag "B" Where bla bla ... (S, A, T, B stand for the

Re: Nifty trick with tags and \shape

} > } > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@ > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Interesting! I'll check this out tonight, that's pretty sweet! Thanks! - compose

Re: Nifty trick with tags and \shape

Very cool! Thanks for sharing! I didn't realize you could do such a thing. I can see this coming in handy. -Abraham -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Nifty-trick-with-tags-and-shape-tp163576p163599.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabbl

Nifty trick with tags and \shape

If you ever need the score and a transposed part to have a different slur shape in places... this does it :) Just had to share -- actually I wasn't entirely sure this would work, but it's perfect! hjh \version "2.18.2" \language "english" music = \relative c' { \tupletSpan 1*6/8 \tuplet 4

Re: tags on tweaks

Am 15.06.2014 12:29, schrieb Orm Finnendahl: Hi, just to verify: I assume it is always necessary to tag a complete music expression, or can just tweaks themselves get tagged? You may insert the tag itself as a post-event using -\tag before the tweak, yet the tag will then apply both to the tw

Re: tags on tweaks

2014-06-15 12:29 GMT+02:00 Orm Finnendahl : > \version "2.19.5" > > music = { \clef "G" r4 > \tag #'score { fis'''8 -\tweak X-offset #-2.5 \f [ } > \tag #'part { fis'''8 \f [ } > ees'' c' a''' ] r4 } > > > { \keepWithTag #'score \music > \keepWithTag #'part \musi

tags on tweaks

be left at the default position. It would be nice if just the tweak could get tagged in order to avoid the verbosity of explicitely repeating the musical expression with different tags applied. This works: - begin snippet \version "2.19.5" music = { \c

Re: multiple tags

Is is possible to have simultaneous multiple tags? What makes you think that? As i had difficulties managing multiple tags, i have made for me some little functions to simplify it. With the joined file, your code would become, with the \keepWithTags : %% \include "tagUtil.ly"

Re: multiple tags

James writes: > Is is possible to have simultaneous multiple tags? > I'm trying: > \version "2.14.2" > > control = { > s1*2 > \tag #'threes { \time 3/4 s2. } > \tag #'twos { \time 2/4 s2 } } > tset = \relative c

multiple tags

Is is possible to have simultaneous multiple tags? I'm trying: \version "2.14.2" control = { s1*2 \tag #'threes { \time 3/4 s2. } \tag #'twos { \time 2/4 s2 } } tset = \relative c' { c4 d e f \tag #'up {g4 a b

Re: Problem with Tags

Patrick Karl writes: > I'm having a problem trying to learn how to use tags. The following snippet: > > \version "2.14.2" > music = \relative c' { > \tag #' low {c} > \tag #' high {c'} > d e f g a b

Problem with Tags

I'm having a problem trying to learn how to use tags. The following snippet: \version "2.14.2" music = \relative c' { \tag #' low {c} \tag #' high {c'} d e f g a b c } \score {\new Staff { \keepWithTag #'low \music }

how to deal with octave check and tags ?

I don't know if it will lead to changes in the GDP pitches section, but a few things are nebulous for me about pitches. Here is the problematic code : %%% \version "2.11.34" frag = \relative c'' { g'2 b4 d \tag #'oboe { \octave g'' } g1 } { << \new Staff \keepWithTag #'flute \

Re: removing tags

Bernard, if this helps you, could you please add it to LSR so that other people can easily find this answer? http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/ Cheers, - Graham Michael Lauer wrote: Bernard Hurley fong-hurley.org.uk> writes: Hi all, Is there any way of removing tags from music? You can writ

Re: removing tags

Thanks, /Bernard On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 13:44 +, Michael Lauer wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Is there any way of removing tags from music? > > You can write a music function to do it: > ___ lilypond-user m

  1   2   >